People, if you haven't heard of chozen, it's only because you didn't play melee at an informed level for long enough. As imo the top 3 jiggz ppl had heard of were mango, king, chozen... and in brawl, Overswarm and Chozen are the 2 ROBs peple agree are the best so far.
Boss8 is insane, but the fact is that mario is just better than people assume.
My problem with this community right now is their INABILITY to do the following.
1. Think critically
2. Research
3. Come up w/ their own ideas.
This is why when someone comes along and posts something you don't expect, even if they give reasons (*cough, chozen*), you don't think, you come up with these ingrained responses that don't show any cognitive function.
I'm not saying I agree with chozen's list (though I actually like most of it...I just think he drastically underestimates a few toons), but at least when I look at it I think about it and question it, see why he says things, and proceed to comment on it after that.
Why the hell don't 95% of you do that? It would make this thread readable again, lead to GOOD debate, not just having to rehash the same things over and over, and in general it would help to inform the community.
re: mario. Because of his cape and fireballs, he *can* be played like pit, except that he doesn't have a wasted move (downB), and he lasts longer. He kills better, and has a better edgeguarding game. Pit is easy to manuever with, and has a better projectile, but why do ppl automatically assume pit=good, mario=bad? It's because we've been telling ourselves sice day 1 that mario isn't good, because he changed from melee, and has a move that works novelly (fludd). Even though he can combo, camp, stop campers, and kill, he's average at all those.
However, in brawl, where disadvantages are move set, being average at everything is better, because it means that there will be some way to respond. In melee even disadvantaged chars could make up for it do to l-cancelling, WDing, but in brawl, disadvantages can't really be overcome, (except by mindgames), meaning a "balanced, average" char like mario is actually better than chars that are great in 1-2 area's but bad at the others...
Now, I'm not saying mario is god, but he's certainly in mid tier, and could rise, if more ppl use him at the same level boss can.
re: "He doesn't look so good." This is brawl. No high level brawl play will look super flashy, as it could in melee. Even in melee, serious games were much different from the same ppl making a combo video. A great example of this would be to watch a few melty blood tournie matches--where you'll go from playing super cautiously to aggressive depending on whether you *need* to win or not.
In brawl, it's all about calculating risk/reward, and knowing when to back off, which comes much sooner in brawl than any other fighting game, meaning top level games will look boring, and great players won't shine, so much as they will simply out-do the other player...so don't say "x doesn't look that good," instead, actually watch the effin match.
This thread is so aggravating