blacktwins13
Smash Journeyman
BSMD is more accurate IMOIf your name was Blackdwins13 then the two of you arguing = BDSM
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
BSMD is more accurate IMOIf your name was Blackdwins13 then the two of you arguing = BDSM
I been hearing that since the very beginning & most still lose to one.No flaming needed.
Mario is bad.
Dead serious son. Publish a book and I'll buy it top dolla.
Only way to show Mario is good is to come up with new setups people haven't see yet.I been hearing that since the very beginning & most still lose to one.
I came in 13th place at a tourney few weeks back w/mario. (2nd in pools)
I'm sorry kid, but losing to Ryker and blindspot are unacceptable. That AL/GA tourney that gladiel got 4th at had like 3 good players. Getting 13th out of 30 is not that good, but good forI been hearing that since the very beginning & most still lose to one.
I came in 13th place at a tourney few weeks back w/mario. (2nd in pools)
Hi there! And yea, it's thought that Olimar was given a huge bump (quite possibly too much of a bump, or at least i've always thought so, but only slighty) because of Apex 2012. And it's not like he won either. ZSS at first is gigantic. Ironically, I only think she'll go up a few spots. 2 or 3 IMO. It's interesting...Sorry to draw the discussion away from Mario for a sec, but I noticed that one of the main reasons Olimar jumped so high on the list was because 4 of the top 16 at apex '12 were using him. You think we'll see ZSS jump up a few spots after Salem's performance at apex '13? I dunno who she'd knock out of A/B tier though (Wario?).
No.Yes because Wario is super bad
I must admit, it's hard to see wario going anywhere else, unless you plan to make high tier a three-character jig.
haven't laughed that hard in a while.Did you discover the rest of her airdodge?
Nice name, but please fix your location. The Kingslayer lives in King's Landing, not at Casterly Rock.Sorry to draw the discussion away from Mario for a sec, but I noticed that one of the main reasons Olimar jumped so high on the list was because 4 of the top 16 at apex '12 were using him. You think we'll see ZSS jump up a few spots after Salem's performance at apex '13? I dunno who she'd knock out of A/B tier though (Wario?).
Actually the way the kingslayer is going currently, I don't think King's Landing is his home anymore, or at least it won't be much longer.Nice name, but please fix your location. The Kingslayer lives in King's Landing, not at Casterly Rock.
oh right your post has content in it as well.
ZSS will probably go up a few spots, but I don't think it will be as dramatic as Olimar's rise after Apex 2012
UpB isn't actually good though. Most peolpe have no idea how easy it is to SDI it. His jab is pretty good though.mario has a great bair, and a good upB, but the rest of his moveset is terrible. he is most definitely not mid tier material.
idk how much of the show has been shown in Australia yet, and I can assume you haven't read the books, so click the following spoiler box AT YOUR OWN RISK (that goes for anyone who cares about the show and hasn't read the books)Actually the way the kingslayer is going currently, I don't think King's Landing is his home anymore, or at least it won't be much longer.
Tournament results are more often than not a result of players making the most of their character tools. The reason why a Mario will not place high in a tourney is because how limited his options are against most of the cast. Olimar placed well in 2012 because Olimar players knew how to make the most of his amazing tool set. Olimar deserved that 2nd place in the tier list a long time ago, people just weren't able to optimize the use of his tools yet.Jabejazz, the tier is influenced by tournament placements, so him just doing exceptional with Mario would affect his place on the tier. DK went down because he wasn't placing much, and when he did he was not placing well In tourneys. Of course, 1 tournament will not affect much, but if he can keep it up and show that Mario has some more potential then Mario can definitely go up.
Regardless, I still find Mario to be one of the worst characters in the game though.
Implying you know anything about ZSS' match-ups. Also implying Marth's match-ups are half as good as Marth players say they are.Well 1% can be a huge difference.
I could see ZSS jumping up maybe a spot above Pikachu but I don't know about any higher. Over time I (if these results stay consistent) she could maybe knock Marth down one too but her matchups against Falco, Snake, ICs and Olimar would probably prevent her from going any higher.
Is ESAM really the only good Pikachu in the world?
While I agree with your point, I'm not really seeing why Kamemushi should be among those players, and Choco only has a single result(so far, of course).2.) People need to stfu about her results being not very consistent and mostly based on individual skill. Results are proving quite the opposite. Salem, NR, quiK, Kamemushi and Choco all place well in completely different regions and beat their respective top players.
They're twice as good as people say they areAlso implying Marth's match-ups are half as good as Marth players say they are.
This just in, Marth has a +6 on PT, Ness, Lucas, Jigglypuff, Zelda and GanonThey're twice as good as people say they are
ZSS' -1 match-ups are Olimar and MK for sure. Falco is -1 and debatably even. Diddy is probably 0, I don't know if that will change in the MU chart coming up. Wario is debatable, I lean towards -1 but Wario is a non-factor tbh. ICs is weird, I think it's 0 though. Going by results it looks less than favorable, but last time Vinnie and Salem played, Salem hadn't gone into hyperbolic time chamber training in PA and 9B vs. NickRiddle was just a skill discrepancy and nothing more. Also Choco beat 9B in winners and lost in GFs, so it wasn't a shut-out. Snake is even. Stay salty, Sage.I don't really, at least not from experience or actual knowledge.
I just trusted this: http://www.ssbwiki.com/Character_matchup_(SSBB) and took Gheb_01's word for the ZSS/IC matchup.
1. You have a point about ICs, but I think ICs is a match-up that takes a while to learn and do well in. I'll concede to this point for now but ZSS has the perfect kit to handle ICs including moves that are save on block, awesome punishes, and an aerial set designed perfectly to keep them separated. ESAM hates the match-up, could just be him. ZSS players have gotten a lot better lately; remember that ZSS lost to every Diddy Kong like a year ago too, that match-up record was abysmal despite it appearing that ZSS had tools there.1.) ZSS players have no ****ing clue about their character's matchups if you ask me. Where is the idea coming from that ZSS beats ICs and DDD? Why do ZSS players still think they lose to Diddy when that matchup has one of the most even matchup records possible? And why are they starting to take Falco a lot more lightly when there's nothing to suggest that the matchup has improved for her in any way? I mean, I'm not saying that you should completely subscribe to my way of interpreting results but when you have seven big losses against IC players and only one win within the last one and a half years you should probably realize that it's time to question your claim to you have an advantage against them. Even 0 seems completely utopical at this point