Illmatic disagrees, and I'm pretty sure Gnes does too. idk what ADHD thinks about it.Peach's and Diddy's I believe agreed to the ratio, there wasn't a disagreement with it.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Illmatic disagrees, and I'm pretty sure Gnes does too. idk what ADHD thinks about it.Peach's and Diddy's I believe agreed to the ratio, there wasn't a disagreement with it.
OH LOOK, it's a purple name party.
Seagull, what's your record against the good marth's?
Toon Link main says that should be top of mid tier.I have a question.
Should Toon Link be Mid or High Tier on the next update?
Does he deserve a rise/fall over the characters surrounding him?
Well either way they were almost unanimous in saying Peach wins.Illmatic disagrees, and I'm pretty sure Gnes does too. idk what ADHD thinks about it.
That's dumb.Well either way they were almost unanimous in saying Peach wins.
Let's take a look at this matchup chart. It's not only Peach who is severely overrated against Diddy. Luigi -1? Are you serious? Metaknight at even? Kirby, ROB, Mario, and Pit all even? omfg loooool. DDD at +1 as well as Sheik?
-1:
0:
1:
2:
3:
For real.
The Real BBR Matchup Chart for PeachIllmatic, which matchups on the Peach BBR MU Chart do you disagree with?
The Fake BBR Matchup Chart for Peach
-3:
-2:
-1:
-.5:
0:
1:
2:
3:
___________________________
-2:
-1:
0:
1:
2:
3:
omfg sig'd LOOOOOLtl is top of mid tier.
just doesn't belong in high tier.
edit:
banana in hand
banana on the ground
peanut gun out
Welcome to texas.
check it yoI'm not Illmatic but I think -2 to MK is generous. Also I think she loses to Dedede slightly.
I'm surprised with Snake at -3.they must, because they opposed my (correct) viewpoint on it being a disadvantage.
IMO
-3: snake
-2.5: mk
-2: marth, falco
-1: lucario, toon link, wolf, game & watch
0: diddy, dedede, fox, pit, dk, pokemon trainer, ike, samus, zamus, rob, wario
1: pikachu, olimar, lkirby, luigi, sonic, ice climbers, sheik, yoshi
2: ness, lucas, mario, bowser, jiggs
3: zelda, falcon, ganon, link
but making your own list is pretty pointless really...its not going to change for awhile. perhaps when you get back there you can see if people want to make some changes to the chart.
I would so debate this but knowing you, you will just be stupid in the discussion while I a calm. I rather debate this with someone who does not play wolf then with you.All I know is Wolf beats Peach (+1) and the matchup chart says its even (0) for reasons unknown.
Cause last time we did this and I brought in facts on the match up from my side, he was all like (lolololol, no, Peach sucks, bair, we win, camp, lolololol). I am not gonna bother with that anymore from people. I now just don't bother and/or add them on ignore. I try to be chill and calm with debating. And I expect people to do the same. But then people wanna try and show off online to get a few laughs. So then I turn the other cheek. Then this net image of me goes on (oh look, Its Dark.Pch, so emo, he sucks, wrong, lololloloolol).I used to respect you
EDIT: Why wouldnt you want to debate the Peach Wolf MU with one of the best wolf mains, who's actually pretty respected around here?
Try me sir. Peach vs Wolf:I would so debate this but knowing you, you will just be stupid in the discussion while I a calm. I rather debate this with someone who does not play wolf then with you.
So I will say this, You are wrong and you can think what you want.
I don't overhype Wolf I think. I think the matchup chart is a little incorrect for his matchups, but I can't exactly go in and edit it.Yeah like I'd rather talk about a MU with someone who plays it rather than not unless they overhype their character and/or don't know what they are talking about.
Dedede as even with Peach? And Snake as -3? I think Snake isn't THAT bad for Peach. That's like Snake vs Lucas/Ness loooooool.they must, because they opposed my (correct) viewpoint on it being a disadvantage.
IMO
-3: snake
-2.5: mk
-2: marth, falco
-1: lucario, toon link, wolf, game & watch
0: diddy, dedede, fox, pit, dk, pokemon trainer, ike, samus, zamus, rob, wario
1: pikachu, olimar, lkirby, luigi, sonic, ice climbers, sheik, yoshi
2: ness, lucas, mario, bowser, jiggs
3: zelda, falcon, ganon, link
but making your own list is pretty pointless really...its not going to change for awhile. perhaps when you get back there you can see if people want to make some changes to the chart.
Peach's are fickle.I don't think any Peach agrees with the Wolf rating.
I think Peach vs Mk can't be that bad. I see all these Peach's beating top Mk's, which makes me believe he cannot possibly beat Peach worst then -2. Otherwise, the Mk's have some matchup inexperience/problems.the only reason mk is listed as -2 is because both rob and ddd also listed mk as -2. i will say that i was very involved in making mk a -2 for us but there is absolutely no reason that she should be listed as worse than ddd and rob at the matchup when she clearly isn't. ill has beaten dojo and red halberd, i have beaten seibrik and dphat...i really dont see that mu as -3. at least it isnt worse than ddd and rob.
seagull i totally agree with you. take it up with the wolves, they were totally inactive and the peach rating (which i didnt agree with and dont agree with) of even passed with no opposition.
I used to respect you
EDIT: Why wouldnt you want to debate the Peach Wolf MU with one of the best wolf mains, who's actually pretty respected around here?