I guess we'll just see when we play next. Like I said, I'm not arguing either way, just asking you to not count me out so quickly. I'm realizing in melee I have a lot more trouble in some matchups than others, which is something I really need to work on. What I'm essentially trying to say is this:
sweet = good at the fox/marth matchup, bad (compared to how well he knows the fox matchup) at the peach matchup
me = bad at the fox/marth matchup, good at the sheik matchup
therefore, I have a chance of beating sweet EVEN IF HE IS THE BETTER PLAYER OVERALL.
This speculation is silly. Go ahead and put sweet higher than me, he already was higher even when I was consistently beating him. It's not like I care about this list at all anymore.