Shantae would rock. I'd also vote for sans, Shovel Knight, Cuphead ... any popular independent oc.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Sure. But that doesn't mean all other comparisons to all other video games everywhere becomes automatically invalid. Because then I could use the same excuse to counter any argument as well.I mean, Super Smash Bros. is in a pretty unique spot
Because you're asking me prove something that can't be proven. Because there's no evidence for it. But then you're acting like that's proof that what you're saying IS true. But it's not.I know no one wants to lose the big roster, but I'm just trying to get around the obfuscation and get to some direct questions which on your end should be defensible if you believe Ultimate Deluxe wouldn't definitely sell worse than Smash 6.
Sure. But by that same token, if you go "Smash Ultimate, now with Master Chief and Waluigi!" they'd be just as down. They're not going to turn their noses up at a better running version of Smash with more characters because its a rerelease.I feel like some dudes underestimate the fact that all people really need to see is a trailer with Master Chief and some Waluigi memes and they'll be down with the new Smash. It's not like they'll turn their nose up at a brand new Super Smash Bros because Young Link isn't on the roster.
And sometimes, people think that if they type more words, it automatically makes their argument more valid.Eh, people aren't always willing to defend their points. Which just means there's nothing to pursue conversation-wise. It's better to move on when someone just dodges the question. Either they can answer it, or are ignoring it, or don't know enough to give an actual answer.
We're 56 thousand posts into this topic... There are limits to the number of ways you can assemble human language together.Smash Bros discussion should be fun, not tedious.
No it's not. It's about showing off the product and why it's worth getting. Lies and misdirection aren't a part of that assignment. In fact, to a certain degree it's literally illegal.I’ve never understood people complaining about being lied to when it comes to these games. Of course they lied, that’s what marketing is.
I wasn't trying to imply that everyone was hate playing the game or something, just that the discourse probably kept the games in people's minds more. I also listed the fact that it was the first mainline Pokémon title on a home console. That alone is super enticing.but I think you’re missing the point. It’s not that sword and shield sold well it’s that they’re the second best selling in the series. That is a lofty position to hold and you don’t achieve it through people wanting to see how bad something is. These games sold better than than every game the fandom say they have no complaints about.
Kazuma Kiryu [Like A Dragon]To break up the monotony of the current conversation, what characters from the 2000s do you think could be added.
I still don't think Shantae counts as an indie character anymore. Because WayForward is too large to still be considered an indie company at this point.Shantae would rock. I'd also vote for sans, Shovel Knight, Cuphead ... any popular independent oc.
I didn't.Did anyone predict that Smash would eventually get a roster so large it couldn't be sustainable say back in the melee or brawl days?
Yes. I knew as soon as it was announced that I'd want it to always be a thing.Or that "Everyone is here" would lead to some fans clamouring for "and it'll be forever?"
well i just it hard to give credibility to the fandom that cried wolfNo it's not. It's about showing off the product and why it's worth getting. Lies and misdirection aren't a part of that assignment. In fact, to a certain degree it's literally illegal.
I wasn't trying to imply that everyone was hate playing the game or something, just that the discourse probably kept the games in people's minds more. I also listed the fact that it was the first mainline Pokémon title on a home console. That alone is super enticing.
And honestly I think you're missing my point. It's not that the series is doing poorly now. It objectively isn't. It just isn't on a sustainable course. It seems they may be moving to fix that, but if they don't, it will probably start to show beyond people yelling online and then buying the games anyway.
i know i certainly didn'tDid anyone predict that Smash would eventually get a roster so large it couldn't be sustainable say back in the melee or brawl days? Or that "Everyone is here" would lead to some fans clamouring for "and it'll be forever?" Just curious, in retrospect because I didn't get into speculation until half way through fighter pass 2...
I'm considering doing the same. Most times, I can't even think of what to say here.Real talk, I think I'm gonna step away from honest Smash speculation until the next game is announced. Right now, speculation has done nothing but keep going in circles over and over again and it's not fun for me anymore.
Does Joanna Dark count?To break up the monotony of the current conversation, what characters from the 2000s do you think could be added.
Master ChiefTo break up the monotony of the current conversation, what characters from the 2000s do you think could be added.
Yeah, certain people need to stop making these ridiculously long posts on things they could easily say in just a couple of sentences. It's very unnecessary.And sometimes, people think that if they type more words, it automatically makes their argument more valid.
It doesn't. Sometimes it's just filler, meant to make the argument seem more intelligent or supported than it is.
Isaac and Felix (Golden Sun).To break up the monotony of the current conversation, what characters from the 2000s do you think could be added.
I didn't realize. Ooo she could be the first 3rd party from a company not in smash that also started after all the giants already in the game.I still don't think Shantae counts as an indie character anymore. Because WayForward is too large to still be considered an indie company at this point.
Aren't indie game developers studios that aren't owned or backed by video game publishers?I still don't think Shantae counts as an indie character anymore. Because WayForward is too large to still be considered an indie company at this point.
Monster Hunter seems like a pretty safe answer here. Shadow as well.To break up the monotony of the current conversation, what characters from the 2000s do you think could be added.
Shovel Knight had some strong ties to Nintendo even before Ultimate, what with the amiibo he got a couple of years prior and Nintendo actually publishing the game in Japan. Probably was pretty easy to contact Yacht Club and get the rights to him for the AT.But riddle me this why is shovel Knight an assist and she isnt in your opinion? Was she already too big to play ball back during Ultimate dev? I never played her games but her design is great and I know she's mega popular so it's a safe horse to back. But maybe less so eh?
I understand this perspective, but I do think it's a bit dismissive of someone like Tom Nook or KK Slider's potential. Because yeah, at face value it's yet another quirky "non-fighter" moveset. But Tom Nook for example, he's got certain thematic elements and design traits that would effectively make him incompatible with Villager's kit in the first place. He has a slight snobbishness to him, he feels somewhat above the likes of using a slingshot or fireworks. His tail opens up more direct physical combat opportunities, he's got the Nooklings for potential assists, his role within the games begs for some sort of bells mechanic / install situation. The most I see him sharing with Villager and Isabelle is basically Pocket - which I think is an okay unifying factor between the three. My idea for Nook's Pocket is that instead of storing an item and throwing it back he exchanges whatever he grabbed for bells. And no need to get into KK Slider, a music oriented kit and a guitar are more than enough to start building off of.I feel very stubborn about considering a third Animal Crossing character. It's a big series, yes, but something doesn't sit right about a potential third Villager running around; compared to the Marth or Fox archetype, I feel that turning Villager into a complete character archetype would fly in the face of what made the Villager an interesting inclusion in the first place, being a non-fighter whose tools and objects are refitted for a fighting game context. I gave Isabelle a pass primarily because she is overwhelmingly popular, but I think any more beyond her would run the risk of making the once-unique Villager feel...ordinary. It'd be like if I took Mr. Game & Watch's concept and added a "Mr. Famicom" and "Mr. Arcade" alongside him. Sure, the latter two would have great potential for unique toolsets, but now Mr. Game & Watch doesn't feel really all that special any more.
Tom Nook, I know AC gets overlooked due to the nature of the series, but it remains one og Nintendo's most popular and Tom Nook is still a beloved character people would like to see from it.To break up the monotony of the current conversation, what characters from the 2000s do you think could be added.
People predicted that Smash 4's roster wasn't going to be that much bigger than Brawl and that it was as big as Smash was going to go back in the day, but that was mainly because everyone had their expectations sky high back during the Brawl day's only for it to come crashing down when they found out the roster was much smaller than they had initiallyDid anyone predict that Smash would eventually get a roster so large it couldn't be sustainable say back in the melee or brawl days? Or that "Everyone is here" would lead to some fans clamouring for "and it'll be forever?" Just curious, in retrospect because I didn't get into speculation until half way through fighter pass 2...
Sakurai kinda did.Did anyone predict that Smash would eventually get a roster so large it couldn't be sustainable say back in the melee or brawl days?
Waluigi: One of the largest fan requests right now.To break up the monotony of the current conversation, what characters from the 2000s do you think could be added.
Very Confident - Waluigi, Tom NookTo break up the monotony of the current conversation, what characters from the 2000s do you think could be added.
Well, I got my white whale with Sora, so now I guess I’ll suggest Estelle Bright as my next MW from the 2000’s.To break up the monotony of the current conversation, what characters from the 2000s do you think could be added.
How is WayForward not also a video game publisher?Aren't indie game developers studios that aren't owned or backed by video game publishers?
I can't say I agree as this is similar to the arguments we saw with Isabelle. Many fans back in Ultimate's pre-release period argued that she shouldn't be a fighter because she's a pacifist and is never involved in fighting, with even some pointing to her Smash 4 AT as proof as she hands out healing items and avoids attacks. Yet, she still got upgraded to a playable fighter despite the arguments made against her. Tom Nook being an old guy doesn't stop him from being a potential fighter, as long as they can think up a way to make him work they can easily make him playable.Ya know I can't really get behind the idea of Tom Nook in smash. Maybe if he got in brawl, but nowadays they portray him as just an old guy. He doesn't really strike me as the fighting type tbh. He probably has back issues.
Once they started putting him in sweater vests his chances were OVER.
If they had to add another AC rep, I'd probably go with Resetti. He seems like he has enough free time.
No bwd?Very Confident - Waluigi, Tom Nook
It's easy to forget these two belong to any era in particular, but they debuted right at the cusp of the new millennium. I think Mario and Animal Crossing are pretty much assured brand new content to keep the roster appealing to an audience predominantly familiar with Nintendo's biggest series. One is arguably the most popular fan request at the moment and the other is the most significant character absent from his respective series.
Have a Good Feeling - Isaac, Monster Hunter
I believe Isaac's fan demand and the nostalgia surrounding Golden Sun has become prominent enough for him to be as serious a contender as he's ever been. Meanwhile Monster Hunter continues to be a huge success for Capcom and Nintendo alike, already has a presence in Ultimate and continues to be a near Dragon Quest level phenomenon in Japan. As long as there are no issues with making the Hunter playable, it really just feels like a no-brainer.
Could Happen - Skull Kid, Lyn, Paper Mario, Lloyd Irving / Yuri Lowell, Shadow the Hedgehog...
Bit more of a mixed list here, but mostly want to highlight the first two. Skull Kid and Lyn are victims of their series moving forward without them, due to the fleeting nature of Zelda villains and FE protagonists respectively. But despite this have managed to maintain a strong following and remain icons within their series to this day. Majora's Mask is one of Zelda's biggest pieces of iconography and Lyn manages to stand among Marth and Ike as one of the faces of Fire Emblem, and demonstrably one of its most popular characters. I place this in the "could happen" category because it wouldn't be all that surprising to see them neglected yet again in favor of new content from their series, but their persistence would make their addition feel warranted at any point.
And oh yeah, I guess Master Chief is a 2000s character too. He's kind of THE 2000s character, actually. But for what it's worth, I was thinking more in the realm of base game picks and I don't see him as a practical choice until DLC kicks in post-release. Hence why I'm not hitting on too many third party characters outside some of the most obvious returning collaborators and series here.
Partially debuted in the 90s, made his proper debut in the 2010s.No bwd?
bit ageistYa know I can't really get behind the idea of Tom Nook in smash. Maybe if he got in brawl, but nowadays they portray him as just an old guy. He doesn't really strike me as the fighting type tbh. He probably has back issues.
Once they started putting him in sweater vests his chances were OVER.
If they had to add another AC rep, I'd probably go with Resetti. He seems like he has enough free time.
Good catch I forgotten we were discussing 2000s I didn't play much else but I would have loved Alexandra Roivas hahaPartially debuted in the 90s, made his proper debut in the 2010s.
Either way, not from the 2000s.
i mean yeah, it's just my opinion. technically, they can do anything they want. But most people i think would say it'd be a little weird if Tortimer got into smash, so obviously there's some line where a character's in-game portrayal makes it weird for them to fight.I can't say I agree as this is similar to the arguments we saw with Isabelle. Many fans back in Ultimate's pre-release period argued that she shouldn't be a fighter because she's a pacifist and is never involved in fighting, with even some pointing to her Smash 4 AT as proof as she hands out healing items and avoids attacks. Yet, she still got upgraded to a playable fighter despite the arguments made against her. Tom Nook being an old guy doesn't stop him from being a potential fighter, as long as they can think up a way to make him work they can easily make him playable.
Resetti is a great idea, but he doesn't make a whole lot of sense these days without sufficient outcry to bring him back to the limelight. I like him a lot but the series has all but retired him, so it would be weird to see him make it into Smash when mainstays like Nook and KK Slider are still absent.If they had to add another AC rep, I'd probably go with Resetti. He seems like he has enough free time.
I wish people who kept saying this would actually read the dozens of times we've spoken about this and provided all sorts of different directions that can be taken to fill out Tom Nook's moveset. Let alone KK Slider, who I can't see operating remotely similar to any of these three.Animal Crossing just doesn't offer much when it comes to moveset potential, which is a given as it's a life simulation game with not a lot of action. Villager already covers a lot of what the player can do in the game in his moveset, and Isabelle had to share some attacks with him. I think that we might be in for more Villager semi-clones if AC does get more reps.
Truthfully I only think Villager, Isabelle and Tom Nook are 100% necessary. KK Slider serves his role nicely as a Smashville easter egg and Resetti is MIA (they should at least bring him back as an AT). It's just when people deny the potential that any of these characters uniquely possess it can be a little frustrating. Either way I'd gladly accept any of those three as newcomers, but I wanted to also make it clear I'm not trying to greedily say the series should have as many characters as Pokemon either. We really just need the one other Big Guy. Three characters is entirely fair and warranted for a series of its size.The absolute max AC can bring to the roster is Villager, Isabelle, Tom Nook, K.K Slider, and Resetti. Everyone else is just stuff that can be easily done by those five. And even thats REALLY stretching the potential of AC for fighter candidates.
I thought it was Villager, Isabelle, Tom Nook, Ankha and Audie. At least, that's what the internet majority keeps telling me.The absolute max AC can bring to the roster is Villager, Isabelle, Tom Nook, K.K Slider, and Resetti.
You just lack imagination, amigoAnimal Crossing just doesn't offer much when it comes to moveset potential, which is a given as it's a life simulation game with not a lot of action. Villager already covers a lot of what the player can do in the game in his moveset, and Isabelle had to share some attacks with him. I think that we might be in for more Villager semi-clones if AC does get more reps.
And sometimes, people think that if they type more words, it automatically makes their argument more valid.
It doesn't. Sometimes it's just filler, meant to make the argument seem more intelligent or supported than it is.
Oof. I'm probably in that camp somewhat, though more because my posts are just stream of consciousness and I do very little proofreading. It's why my longer posts are end on a very different not than they start.Yeah, certain people need to stop making these ridiculously long posts on things they could easily say in just a couple of sentences. It's very unnecessary.
What did you expect from someone who likes to go "I don't think"?You just lack imagination, amigo
Even ignoring my pfp, I'm going to provide counterpoints in Wii Fit Trainer, Duck Hunt, and Isabelle.Ya know I can't really get behind the idea of Tom Nook in smash. Maybe if he got in brawl, but nowadays they portray him as just an old guy. He doesn't really strike me as the fighting type tbh. He probably has back issues.
Once they started putting him in sweater vests his chances were OVER.
If they had to add another AC rep, I'd probably go with Resetti. He seems like he has enough free time.