KillerCage
Smash Master
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2019
- Messages
- 4,419
If Travis does make it, THIS has to be part of the pack!
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
If you have to preface your question with "is it wrong", then you have your answer.Is it wrong that I want to see Travis as part of the last mii fighter bundle just to see the salt?
I mean Bayonetta gets naked when she attacks. They can censor that stuff.I always thought that the more...Adult, themes of the game may be a bigger barrier than other M-rated games.
As I said, there was definitely bias involved in my thinking. After talking about it with Ramen Tengoku , I see now that censoring him would be pretty easy and not affect the character's representation at all.I mean Bayonetta gets naked when she attacks. They can censor that stuff.
I think you're misunderstanding just how much of a legal tightrope an NDA can be when it's that heavily enforced. As I said before, a lot of companies will prevent a problematic question from being asked as a precautionary measure, particularly when there's one or more topics that they are literally unable to discuss.Well it was asked and if Travis isn't the game in some context I have no reason to believe Suda wouldn't have given his normal candid answer. Because every other instance reinforces that precedent. He was doing it as recently as last year.
I don't think sudden onset professionalism apropos of nothing is the likelier culprit here, I gotta be honest.
I think you're making quite a few presumptions over what Suda's interview stipulations are, especially given people within companies with unrevealed Smash content have been allowed to be asked about Smash, even if they're not allowed to give a straight answer. Which Suda didn't.
Reading too much into an answer is something we're probably all familiar with, but reading too much into a question might be a new one for me.
Well, we know Nintendo choose all the DLC this game. So that likely wouldn't play a role.Also, aren't Suda and Sakurai really close friends irl?
tbh it was only a matter of time before he nagged Travis in, Kojima-style
No, I refuse to be chill.this is just a repeat of the doom interview thing lmao, yall gotta chill
Does anyone want to make thoughts of my prediction?You know what? My gut is telling me that Travis Touchdown is FP7, and Monster Hunter is FP8.
I know this is a risky bet, but I feel like this has a better chance than most predictions.
It's literally not though. The big difference is that Suda51 has on EVERY SINGLE OTHER OCCASION given a plain "the fans should ask for him" or "he's not in but if he was here's what I'd do" type answer. This is the ONLY time he's ever been cagey.this is just a repeat of the doom interview thing lmao, yall gotta chill
Okay then... what if Suda nagged nintendo?Well, we know Nintendo choose all the DLC this game. So that likely wouldn't play a role.
This is part of the reason why I think it could be a bit of a stretch. Changing answers makes it way too obvious about something upcoming, I don't see why Suda wouldn't say what he did in the past if Travis were to be in.I think you're misunderstanding just how much of a legal tightrope an NDA can be when it's that heavily enforced. As I said before, a lot of companies will prevent a problematic question from being asked as a precautionary measure, particularly when there's one or more topics that they are literally unable to discuss.
And before you bring up stuff like Phil Spencer or Grant Kirkhope, it's important to note that Phil Spencer, when asked about Banjo on those two instances, gave the same answer each time. Remaining with the same opinion or stance is the best way to get out of the NDA, because by saying the same thing you said before the NDA even happened, nobody knows whether or not something changed, because it's the same answer they got before. And Grant Kirkhope had historically been skeptical about the future of Banjo, so him saying "don't count on it" was completely in character.
Suda not only allowing the question but changing his answer implies he has a lot more breathing room than either of those two.
Actually thinking about it, If this is a case, has there ever been an Interview where Activision has been asked about Crash in Smash. Considering how much talk he's gotten in regards to Smash, well...you know...I think you're misunderstanding just how much of a legal tightrope an NDA can be when it's that heavily enforced. As I said before, a lot of companies will prevent a problematic question from being asked as a precautionary measure, particularly when there's one or more topics that they are literally unable to discuss.
And before you bring up stuff like Phil Spencer or Grant Kirkhope, it's important to note that Phil Spencer, when asked about Banjo on those two instances, gave the same answer each time. Remaining with the same opinion or stance is the best way to get out of the NDA, because by saying the same thing you said before the NDA even happened, nobody knows whether or not something changed, because it's the same answer they got before. And Grant Kirkhope had historically been skeptical about the future of Banjo, so him saying "don't count on it" was completely in character.
Suda not only allowing the question but changing his answer implies he has a lot more breathing room than either of those two.
So you think it's likelier that Suda changed his entire disposition for no real reason rather than being under an NDA where "no comment" was an acceptable answer?I think you're misunderstanding just how much of a legal tightrope an NDA can be when it's that heavily enforced. As I said before, a lot of companies will prevent a problematic question from being asked as a precautionary measure, particularly when there's one or more topics that they are literally unable to discuss.
And before you bring up stuff like Phil Spencer or Grant Kirkhope, it's important to note that Phil Spencer, when asked about Banjo on those two instances, gave the same answer each time. Remaining with the same opinion or stance is the best way to get out of the NDA, because by saying the same thing you said before the NDA even happened, nobody knows whether or not something changed, because it's the same answer they got before. And Grant Kirkhope had historically been skeptical about the future of Banjo, so him saying "don't count on it" was completely in character.
Suda not only allowing the question but changing his answer implies he has a lot more breathing room than either of those two.
This. , , and have easily proven the whole, "Think of the children!" logic wrong.On the topic of whether or not Travis' source material is too adult-themed, I say, screw this "think of the children" nonsense, we wanna see Travis in Smash!
Please don't make "not being asked about Smash" a point in favour of a character.Actually thinking about it, If this is a case, has there ever been an Interview where Activision has been asked about Crash in Smash. Considering how much talk he's gotten in regards to Smash, well...you know...
Well I'll tell you, I asked Chris Seavor (creator of Conker) about Conker getting into Smash on Twitter, and he flat out told me no, and said I shouldn't waste my energy predicting something that will never happen!Please don't make "not being asked about Smash" a point in favour of a character.
Please.
I think that's pretty sound advice when it comes to Conker.Well I'll tell you, I asked Chris Seavor (creator of Conker) about Conker getting into Smash on Twitter, and he flat out told me no, and said I shouldn't waste my energy predicting something that will never happen!
Actually thinking about it, If this is a case, has there ever been an Interview where Activision has been asked about Crash in Smash. Considering how much talk he's gotten in regards to Smash, well...you know...
That is interesting. Yes, I feel like Travis Touchdown is likely now. We were sleeping on him in the past.Also, aren't Suda and Sakurai really close friends irl?
Wait so your telling me since dreamworks hasn’t talked about shrek in smash isn’t a guarantee he is in smashPlease don't make "not being asked about Smash" a point in favour of a character.
Please.
its obvious to us, but to someone not involved in speculation, its just a pr answerI think the prospect of Travis Touchdown joining Smash is awesome! I'd love to see him make the roster.
My only question is: If Travis was in Smash, couldn't Suda have just given his usual nonchalant answer of "oh he's not in, but I do support him being there!" Saying "no comment" would just make it too obvious. I'm not sure about the logistics of the interview, maybe he felt pressured, who knows, but I feel like it's not likely for someone to make it super, super obvious like that. Maybe I'm wrong, I hope I am!
I think when you're approached for Smash and you're given the option of supporting content or nothing, you settle.Like, I just can't see Suda settling for only Spirits or Mii costumes. With how passionate he is about getting Travis in, his close relationship with Sakurai, NMH3 really only being a thing because of Nintendo, and this interview? Travis sits super nicely in my eyes.
I'm going all in on this. I personally think giving the timing, Travis very well could be CP7, and if he isn't, definitely CP8.
My prediction is Travis Touchdown CP7 and Monster Hunter CP8.Like, I just can't see Suda settling for only Spirits or Mii costumes. With how passionate he is about getting Travis in, his close relationship with Sakurai, NMH3 really only being a thing because of Nintendo, and this interview? Travis sits super nicely in my eyes.
I'm going all in on this. I personally think giving the timing, Travis very well could be CP7, and if he isn't, definitely CP8.
Because if they were ONLY going to add a costume for Doom, it would be a Mii Gunner Doom Slayer outfit.With this whole Cacomallow leak Why did people immediately go to "These 2 hats immediately confirm Geno and Doom guy" IF this was real maybe they would add a Cacodemon hat because it is one of the most iconic Enemies in video games?
Fixed.I say both Dante and Monster Hunter are 50/50. Capcom reps in terms of most likely to least likely at least to me.
1. Arthur/Arthur
2. Arthur
3. Arthur
4. Morrigan Aensland
Biggest difference is Nintendo's involvement with NMH3 and Sakurai's relationship with Suda. I personally don't see Nintendo reaching out to him and asking for just some Spirits or a costume when they could get another Bayonetta moment and give a project they've invested heavily in huge promotion.I think when you're approached for Smash and you're given the option of supporting content or nothing, you settle.
As far as we know, Bethesda settled. Ubisoft settled. Koei-Tecmo settled. Arc System Works settled. Several indies settled. Numerous divisions within third-parties settled.
For now, he's all of those simultaneouslySo what do you guys think of Travis?
Fighter? Spirit Board/Event?
Or Mii costume?
Pretty much.For now, he's all of those simultaneouslly
Schrodinger's Travis