I don't really think (from a logical standpoint) it gives him any edge over Hunter, but definitely Phoenix (just due to the fact that PW has always been more of a intermediately sized series, rather than a AAA production, and it has seen no new releases in a decent amount of time).
I mean from a "advantage" standpoint, Hunter has arguably Capcom's most valuable IP currently (and it's not really close), consistent releases, and a much bigger Nintendo history compared to DMC. I mean Capcom is even making a Monster Hunter movie (sure it looks pretty bad, but it's still huge regardless). The Monster Hunter games also started to gain a lot more popularity in the West, when things like 3U, 4U, and Gen came out; and I think Nintendo even helped Capcom localize those games (much like certain DQ games). In fact, I think 3U was one of the best selling 3rd party games on the Wii U.
In comparison, Dante has had a very successful revival, but really that's it; it didn't suddenly become Capcom's most valuable IP. Assuming sales data from wikipedia is correct, DMC 5 has sold around 3.5 million copies which is certainly VERY good, but MH4U itself sold 4 million and unlike DMC 5, MH4U is a console exclusive. And while Dante did have a Switch port with exclusive features in DMC3, MH is supposedly getting a full blown Switch exclusive release revealed as early as next week (according to some very reliable insiders). And Capcom certainly is pushing MH harder than ever, with multiple internal teams working on different products. Meanwhile, there's no real rumors of a Switch exclusive DMC and it's likely that DMC will prioritize other consoles before anything related to Nintendo, on top of having slower releases compared to MH in general.
A lot of people like to say that Byleth already has the gimmick MH would have, but that's wrong. MH has a surprising amount of moveset potential, on top of being able to wield completely different weapons compared to Byleth, they could also give MH a lot of traps/items, and even multiple styles like a potential Dante.
A lot of people also bring up the fact that MH is already represented with a stage/boss/music as a big negative to Hunter's chances. But as we all know by now, I doubt Nintendo really cares if a series already has representation (if they really want a new character). Besides, that content has a decent chance of being agreed upon before MH World even came out (and exploded the series popularity even further).
I think from a "logical" perspective, Monster Hunter has the most advantages going for them for a Capcom rep currently. But that's not to undersell Dante, or even Phoenix Wright, and as we've seen plenty of times sometimes the underdog gets into Smash.
But speaking from my perspective on their chances (if we do end up getting a Capcom rep):
Monster Hunter > Dante >> Phoenix Wright >>>> Other Capcom reps
I pretty much agree with most of your points. You're bringing some really valid points to the table. Each character has different things going for him, and as Scoliosis Jones has said multiple times, each pick doesn't really have to share the same reasons for their inclusions. This is a very basic concept in my opinion but for some reason, people usually skips this notion. Thus, we end getting some people assuming we will only get shill picks because "Byleth happened". Others will affirm that the characters will be fan favorites because "they added Banjo!" or that the remaining fighters will be super unexpected names because "they surprised us with Joker".
Dante, Monster Hunter and Wright all had different strong points going for them.
I'd say that a Devil May Cry exclusive game for the Switch wouldn't make much sense if you ask me, the franchise, if anything, has always been more associated with Playstation, and by that nature, getting an exclusive entry in the future doesn't seem likely at all. I know you weren't suggesting a DMC Switch exclusive as something that could happen, but still, I had to say that, lol
Returning to the characters, we could say that each one has the following:
- Dante: popular character, relevant right now, has legacy, his franchise has made a strong comeback and Capcom seems to want to still pushing the IP in the near future
- Monster Hunter: revelant as ****, specially if the MH Switch game is coming, the latest game in the series is the best selling game in Capcom's history, they're clearly pushing it, and the series has a strong connection to Nintendo consoles
- Phoenix Wright: popular character, historically has been more supported for Smash than the other, for years his series was exclusive of Nintendo consoles until recently, and Nintendo literally published the game in certain countries (if I'm not mistaken, the localization of the original games were made by Nintendo, so the german or the french localization for the HD trilogy had to be made again by Capcom, while the spanish one hasn't returned)
And that doesn't really covers everything because we don't know what is going on behind the scenes. Maybe there's a new Ace Attorney game in development for the Switch which will be announced sometime in the future, and Phoenix Wright will be revealed for Smash to boost the sales of his new game, but we couldn't never have reached that point if the series never had strong ties to Nintendo. Saying this because some people quickly labeled Hero as a shill pick because of DQXIS while forgetting the big legacy that Dragon Quest has on Nintendo consoles.
Or maybe they're going with Dante for other reasons, even if he doesn't have an exclusive game coming to the Switch or doesn't have that much of a history with Nintendo. We know there's precedence for cases like this, and while that obviously doesn't determine anything, it doesn't feel like a strong point against Dante, specially if Nintendo decides to choose him. If we talk about the characters themselves and not their series, I'd say Dante is the biggest name of the three and the most popular in general, being the one that would probably appeal easily to most people, even to those who hadn't played his games. Maybe my bias is getting a little bit here, tho.
In the end we don't really know, because "Nintendo connections" can't really determine anything at all when according to that, we should have got Terra instead of Cloud or a Shin Megami Tensei rep instead of Joker. The same goes the other way around, Master Chief and Steve are definitely more popular and relevant than Banjo, but in the end we got B&K. Resident Evil has higher sales and was (and still is) more relevant than Megaman, and still, we got Megaman as our first Capcom character.
I agree for sure that MH, Dante and Wright are the Capcom contenders if they get another slot. Granted, I think Wright is at a slightly worse position at the moment considering the info we have right now, but still.
I was talking about Phoenix & Amaterasu. Even though I really want Dante, I think Monster Hunter getting in before him would be understandable. I wouldn’t be mad about Phoenix or Ammy since I like both of them, but it’d be confusing tbh.
I wouldn't say Phoenix getting in before Dante would be confusing. Surprising, maybe, because Dante is now more relevant and popular for different reasons, therefore, he's more present when people talks about Smash. But Phoenix still has a decent following. Amaterasu, while I'd adore his inclusion, feels more like a pipe dream. I wouldn't really put her in the same category as Dante, Phoenix or Monster Hunter.
I mean, I want Dante and Phoenix, but the first one is still the one I'd go for if I had to choose, but at the same time, it would be stupid to deny that Wright has more history when it comes to fan demand than Dante (even if it's only because of Ace Attorney strong association with Nintendo), regardless of their popularity in the general gaming community.
One thing is being unlikely, which could fit Phoenix Wright, but other thing is being almost impossible, which sounds more like Amaterasu to me. I literally don't see any scenario where Nintendo and Sakurai decide to skip Monster Hunter, Dante and Phoenix in order to add Amaterasu.