I mean, those were still Directs. It's not like insiders or whoever were wrong. Not all of them, at least. Not really fair, btw, to put the Partner Showcase there. It basically was a completely new thing for Nintendo Directs.
Everyone would agree with me if I say knowing the full fighter pass 2 is very, very unlikely, right? Similar case with the directs. Insiders/leakers/whatever people wants to call them doesn't really know everything. Usually they know about certain games, maybe 1 week prior of the reveal or maybe 1 year prior to the announcement.
I don't know, I feel people usually blames the wrong insiders. If anything they should be mad at the "insiders", those who are seeking attention or those who are just trolling us. Examples? That Setanta guy on Twitter or the infamous HotGirl69, to name 2 recent examples. When the Partner Showcase happened, did they received any backlash? Of course not, because people stupidly decided to go against the one who was right (which almost no one believed at the beginning), for some reason I'll never comprehend.
It's NOT really that hard to differentiate the "good insiders" and the "bad insiders". That doesn't mean the first ones can't be wrong sometimes, I mean, leakbait or wrong sources exist, but denying that people such as Zell/Tsubasa, Nate or Jeff Grubb are folks with reliable info is just nonsense.
Seriously, sometimes I think it's some kind of phenomenon impossible to explain, how people are attracted by fake leakers and random 4chan rumours that are obviously false but then they decide to start being super analytic and cautious with the insiders we know are trustworthy. lmao