Mario123311
Smash Ace
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2013
- Messages
- 721
The way people discard the fact early 2000's was Pac's only real resurgence in any sort of popularity after 1980 just bugs me, (They were what brung along a new generation of young fans to the franchise after all. Helps that PMW2 was packaged alongside Pac-Man Vs.) Even moreso considering how it made him relevant to the mainstream crowd again to some extent. He wasn't Mario-levels of popular but he was a respectable and well-known figure during that time among other third party franchises like Crash Bandicoot and Sonic.I think the reason why people treat Symphonia as Bamco's defining game for that era and not the Pac-Man World games is because the latter are USA titles. I can't find Japanese sales numbers, but it wasn't released on the GameCube there so I'd think it might not be a game that Japanese titles associate with Nintendo that much. In contrast, Symphonia, while less successful commercially, probably had a more even spread worldwide, and is to many people 'Nintendo's Tales'.
There's also the matter of legacy. For non-Japanese audiences Symphonia was more than likely their introduction to Tales. Meanwhile the Pac-Man World games are great, but they're not the first thing most think of when they think about Pac-Man. While Tales keeps getting games to this day, Pac-Man World died after whatever World 3 was.
But either way, I still find it utterly wrong that people act like it's Namco's defining game. "Gamecube Kids" I've met never heard about ToS, They remembered Namco for World 2. I don't mean to ridicule you or anything, But it's honestly getting ridiculous. Also I honestly remembered the World series being fondly remembered up until the early 2010's, Moreso when Pac-Man got his infamous redesign and failed reboot... That's when people started deeming everything aside from the original arcade game as trash.
Last edited: