slrigeigdew
Smash Journeyman
No that's entirely my B I'll swap it with JillUnfortunately, I don't believe that's actually first party.
Unless you meant for them to be the only 3rd party character present.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
No that's entirely my B I'll swap it with JillUnfortunately, I don't believe that's actually first party.
Unless you meant for them to be the only 3rd party character present.
You already admitted Sylux would be unrealistic so I won't bother on that regard, but the others?A common complaint about this pass was that it was "too safe", which is a nicer way of saying they think it's too predictable and boring. Aside from Sylux, I don't think this is a particularly unrealistic all first-party pass. Unless I'm out of the loop, I think a lot of people have agreed that Waluigi, Rex, and a Gen VIII Pokemon are all likely first-parties. Paper Mario is more divisive, but I doubt anyone would go as far as to say he's unlikely. Then there's Spring Man, who's franchise is already confirmed.
If you don't find this lineup to be realistic, I'm curious to hear what you do find likely.
Speaking of Dillon, I think it would be cool if we got a character that could summon a turret of some sort. An area denial character sounds fun to play as, closest thing I can thing of is Plant's side-b or Isabelle's mine.Oh my god I completely forgot about the Chorus Kids in my last post too. And Dillon.
So there are even more really good first party options.
I sleep. There is no one here I like. Only one third party and one legacy character, both being Arle who I'm entirely indifferent on. 0/6 pass for me.Wonder how the general public would react to this hypothetical lineup
76. Twintelle
77. Musashi (Sushi Striker)
78. Future Zelda from BotW2
79. Cinderace
80. Arle Nadja
81. FE character announced in conjunction with the game he'll be in and he looks a bit like this
Yep. Terry Bogard sure is Sylux from Metroid.it's been right about everything
I hate that you're bringing this up because you're probably right and it's going to physically hurt me to see people make such a brain dead comparision to two otherwise completely different characters that are only similar in name alone.People have made vocal criticisms of fatigue of some characters looking similar, so having our third Mario likely won't go over too well in the community where having blue hair means you're a carbon copy of someone else with blue hair
He game seems fun and his character suits Smash more than PlayStation All-Stars.I know PaRappa the Rapper is 100% a sony franchise but i've been thinking about it recently and i think Parappa would make for a really fun and unique character, any thoughts on this ?
And while we're at it, how likely can a Playstation character (That's been featured in Playstation All-star) really join smash ?
I think timed hits, which would be deemed an easy mechanic for anyone from Parappa's franchise, is a godawful idea for a fighting game.I know PaRappa the Rapper is 100% a sony franchise but i've been thinking about it recently and i think Parappa would make for a really fun and unique character, any thoughts on this ?
And while we're at it, how likely can a Playstation character (That's been featured in Playstation All-star) really join smash ?
I have reason to believe that most of these characters will come from unrepresented franchises.A common complaint about this pass was that it was "too safe", which is a nicer way of saying they think it's too predictable and boring. Aside from Sylux, I don't think this is a particularly unrealistic all first-party pass. Unless I'm out of the loop, I think a lot of people have agreed that Waluigi, Rex, and a Gen VIII Pokemon are all likely first-parties. Paper Mario is more divisive, but I doubt anyone would go as far as to say he's unlikely. Then there's Spring Man, who's franchise is already confirmed.
If you don't find this lineup to be realistic, I'm curious to hear what you do find likely.
Remove everyone except Spring Man and replace them with 5 characters from my own wishlist, and I'll be happy.Remove Sylux and Gen 8 Pokemon and replace with Dixie Kong and Impa and I'm happy.
Not without putting at least 3 characters I don't actually want in it, I can't.I also like how this discussion is happening about how third parties ruined people's expectations to inherently hate Nintendo addittions when I can guarntee that everyone who thought the hypothetical pass sucks can make their own pass exclusively out of Nintendo characters
Well, i'm sure sakurai could find an interesting way to use the rythmic aspect of the game without it being too annoying to deal with.I think timed hits, which would be deemed an easy mechanic for anyone from Parappa's franchise, is a godawful idea for a fighting game.
I feel it's the most unlikely potential company to get on board for Smash. Though a Sony character is the only thing I can think of that can rival a Master Chief reveal in terms of blowing everyone's minds
Well, I don't think Paper Mario should be ignored just because he's another Mario. No offense to 3H fans, but if Nintendo genuinely cared about avoiding criticism from fans, I don't think Byleth would've gotten in.You already admitted Sylux would be unrealistic so I won't bother on that regard, but the others?
People have made vocal criticisms of fatigue of some characters looking similar, so having our third Mario likely won't go over too well in the community where having blue hair means you're a carbon copy of someone else with blue hair
I don't think we're getting characters from Resident Evil, Astral Chain, Kunio, etc, and I'm going to give Gen 8 a fair treatment by assuming it's in the same position, especially as the second pass was already decided by the time the spirits got added
I think Rex's gimmick would be too much of a hassle to bother working with, not to mention Xenoblade's a franchise with a revolving cast, unlike Spring Man, Rex isn't guaranteed in a new Xenoblade game
I don't think Assist promotions are going to happen and I need to be proven wrong to be convinced.
There, that's my reasoning, I feel that's pretty fair
Finally, more good Fire Emblem games being repped.Sigurd:
Well, that and the fact that they're, ya know, the same person.I hate that you're bringing this up because you're probably right and it's going to physically hurt me to see people make such a brain dead comparision to two otherwise completely different characters that are only similar in name alone.
I do.Well, I don't think Paper Mario should be ignored just because he's another Mario.
Aren't all fighting game combos technically timed hits anyway?I think timed hits, which would be deemed an easy mechanic for anyone from Parappa's franchise, is a godawful idea for a fighting game.
1% at best, and within that 1% I can only see Nathan Drake or Kratos, with Ratchet & Clank in a really really distant 3rd place.I know PaRappa the Rapper is 100% a sony franchise but i've been thinking about it recently and i think Parappa would make for a really fun and unique character, any thoughts on this ?
And while we're at it, how likely can a Playstation character (That's been featured in Playstation All-star) really join smash ?
Show me the other two Byleths in the game then. It's not just about looking rsther similar, it's about being EXACTLY the same character, like how Zelda fans are annoyed with Link, Link and Link being half of the Zelda castWell, I don't think Paper Mario should be ignored just because he's another Mario. No offense to 3H fans, but if Nintendo genuinely cared about avoiding criticism from fans, I don't think Byleth would've gotten in.
SwSh is split 50/50, but I see it brought up more frequently in prediction passes than most other characters.
Hero got in as DLC, and his gimmick likely required a lot of work. I don't think Rex's gimmick is too complicated for Sakurai's team to handle, and that's assuming the character works the way we're picturing. He could be a lot simpler than that.
Waluigi really depends on Spring Man, but I've seen countless people claim that they expect Spring Man to be the character.
Altogether, I don't think the pass was too out there. I could see people thinking there are a few characters who are more likely than the ones in the pass, but I don't think anyone here would actually say something along the lines of, "You expect Paper Mario, Rex, and Waluigi!? That would never happen! It's so unlikely!"
There's a difference between reacting after a move and reacting to landing the move, one is chaining hits with multiple attacks, not "Do a jab and if you hit the attack button on a specific frame, the jab will be better". Blazblue CTB changed Azreal's gimmick to timed hits and nobody liked it at all, especially when you consider Smash balance is typically based on online, which severely handicaps players' ability to react and chain hits alreadyAren't all fighting game combos technically timed hits anyway?
But if our focus shifts to just adding new franchises, then what does that leave us with for first-parties? Mainly a bunch of really small franchises that don't have the same support as the larger ones.Kinda seems like there's some fabricated idea of people only liking 3rd parties because they're non-Nintendo, and disliking 1st parties because they're Nintendo, when it's actually pretty simple.
I can only speak from my own perspective, but I'll share it. I've said before that I can be steadily convinced of a character by seeing gameplay. I quickly shut up about Robin after seeing their gameplay for Smash Wii U. That was after previously saying, "No, it's gonna be Chrom!"
I've played at least one of each series with a playable character. I have an idea of what/who the characters are that folks want from Nintendo games. Bandanna Waddle Dee, Waluigi, a Gen 8 Pokemon, Zelda. To me, there really isn't anything inherently wrong with wanting a character from those series if that's what you're into.
However, with the way the DLC has been handled historically...it's kinda easy for me to understand why folks may not be especially excited considering the circumstances of that pass, and the potential for an actual pass like that to exist.
Mario has: 16 stages, 9 characters (though Yoshi, Wario, DK, Diddy, and K.Rool could be tangentially related, but I'd argue DK is a bit more removed imo), 106 music tracks, 13 items, 4 Assist Trophies (6 if you consider Klap Trap and Ashley)
Pokemon has: 7 stages, 10 characters, 33 Music tracks, 2 items (55 Pokeball Pokemon NPCs)
Zelda has: 9 stages, 6 characters, (45 music tracks) 6 items, 4 Assist Trophies
Kirby has: 5 stages, 3 characters, (38 music tracks), 4 Items, 2 Assist Trophies
Fire Emblem has: 3 stages,8 characters, 52 music tracks, 1 item, 3 Assist Trophies
That makes 37% of stages, 44% of characters, 28% of music, ~30% of items, and 22% of Assist Trophies. The numbers shoot up just a tad if you include Yoshi, Wario, and DK items. Nearly half the roster comes from these 5 series, over 1/3 of the stages come from these 5 series, over 1/4 of the nearly 1,000 tracks of music come from these 5 series, just under 1/3 of all items comes from these 5 series, and Assist Trophies are just under 1/4 of the total.
Mind you, there are 36 unique series with playable characters in Smash. 5 of them make up a significant portion of the content of the game. Clearly, some have more than others.
Here the thing though...the 3rd party characters that folks talk about. Let's think about some of them...we've got Dante, Crash Bandicoot, Travis Touchdown, 2B, Ace Attorney, or Tekken...just to name a few.
Devil May Cry: 0 Characters, 0 stages, 0 music tracks, 0 ATs, 0 items
NieR Automata: 0 Characters, 0 stages, 0 music tracks, 0 ATs, 0 items
Crash Bandicoot: 0 Characters, 0 stages, 0 music tracks, 0 ATs, 0 items
No More Heroes: 0 Characters, 0 stages, 0 music tracks, 0 ATs, 0 items
Ace Attorney: 0 Characters, 0 stages, 0 music tracks, 0 ATs, 0 items
Tekken: 0 Characters, 0 stages, 0 music tracks, 0 ATs, 0 items
You get the point.
Now, I understand Smash started as a Nintendo crossover. It still is a Nintendo crossover. However, the series itself has grown, and 3rd party characters are a major reason for that. Smash isn't what it is today without 3rd party companies and developers. Nintendo isn't what it is today with 3rd party companies and developers. Smash has become something that stokes the crossover dreams of fans, so it's no wonder fans will think, "Oh boy, I wonder which new series will cross over next!"
It's like getting an Ice Cream cone with 9 scoops on it, and while the next person says, "Excuse me sir, can I get 1 scoop?" and then the person with 9 scoops say, "But wait, what about mine?"
There's nothing wrong with wanting more, but understand that others may not be as open to it when their favorite/most desired has literally nothing in Smash. Nearly every major Nintendo protagonist supporting crew member, and villain is in Smash, so it's not all that surprising that protagonists of larger/popular non-Nintendo series are getting added over lower tier Nintendo characters. That's not something that I'm placing my bias in, it's just where we're at.
That was...a lot to type. Just some food for thought. Mario, Zelda, Pokemon...they are among my favorites. I grew up with them. They're part of who I am. But I've played a lot of games over the years, and at least for me...considering the amount of content we already have, I'd be much more excited to see what we get from something like Devil May Cry as I would be seeing 10 more Mario songs added on top of the 100 we already have, you know?
I have come back from the dead to critique this post.Imagine this being the Season 2 Pass.
Spring Man
Paper Mario
Sylux
Gen 8 Pokemon
Rex
Waluigi
No kidding. ARMS was genuinely unexpected by the vast majority of people, it still didn't quite receive a warm welcome.Not that I genuinely believe the whole issue stems from wanting only unrepped franchises. ARMS had no characters, no stages, and no music, and yet the response ranged from somewhat positive to neutral.
I would love to see Parappa the Rappa in Smash Bros. He would blend in like he was a Nintendo character all along. There are a few other characters I would like to see like Daniel Fortesque, Spike and Tomba.I know PaRappa the Rapper is 100% a sony franchise but i've been thinking about it recently and i think Parappa would make for a really fun and unique character, any thoughts on this ?
And while we're at it, how likely can a Playstation character (That's been featured in Playstation All-star) really join smash ?
Isaac is the only one I like out of this pass. Sleep pass for me.Here’s my first party pass for your judgement:
-Arms rep (I personally think it’s Spring Man)
-Bandana Waddle Dee
-Isaac
-Starfy
-Kid Icarus rep (Viridi, most likely)
-Waluigi
While most of my preferences lie with 3rd parties... I think your point is a bit misleading. You see, while most of the third parties you cited have no "ice cream scoops"... they were never guaranteed to get one. I see a lot of people acting like 1st parties are less hype as if Nintendo somehow promised us that we'd get nothing but guest characters (not you specifically, just a general sentiment I see in this thread). Maybe this is still some leftover bias from that one Reggie statement, I dunno. That's what has led me to say that some users are really taking third parties for granted.Kinda seems like there's some fabricated idea of people only liking 3rd parties because they're non-Nintendo, and disliking 1st parties because they're Nintendo, when it's actually pretty simple.
I can only speak from my own perspective, but I'll share it. I've said before that I can be steadily convinced of a character by seeing gameplay. I quickly shut up about Robin after seeing their gameplay for Smash Wii U. That was after previously saying, "No, it's gonna be Chrom!"
I've played at least one of each series with a playable character. I have an idea of what/who the characters are that folks want from Nintendo games. Bandanna Waddle Dee, Waluigi, a Gen 8 Pokemon, Zelda. To me, there really isn't anything inherently wrong with wanting a character from those series if that's what you're into.
However, with the way the DLC has been handled historically...it's kinda easy for me to understand why folks may not be especially excited considering the circumstances of that pass, and the potential for an actual pass like that to exist.
Mario has: 16 stages, 9 characters (though Yoshi, Wario, DK, Diddy, and K.Rool could be tangentially related, but I'd argue DK is a bit more removed imo), 106 music tracks, 13 items, 4 Assist Trophies (6 if you consider Klap Trap and Ashley)
Pokemon has: 7 stages, 10 characters, 33 Music tracks, 2 items (55 Pokeball Pokemon NPCs)
Zelda has: 9 stages, 6 characters, (45 music tracks) 6 items, 4 Assist Trophies
Kirby has: 5 stages, 3 characters, (38 music tracks), 4 Items, 2 Assist Trophies
Fire Emblem has: 3 stages,8 characters, 52 music tracks, 1 item, 3 Assist Trophies
That makes 37% of stages, 44% of characters, 28% of music, ~30% of items, and 22% of Assist Trophies. The numbers shoot up just a tad if you include Yoshi, Wario, and DK items. Nearly half the roster comes from these 5 series, over 1/3 of the stages come from these 5 series, over 1/4 of the nearly 1,000 tracks of music come from these 5 series, just under 1/3 of all items comes from these 5 series, and Assist Trophies are just under 1/4 of the total.
Mind you, there are 36 unique series with playable characters in Smash. 5 of them make up a significant portion of the content of the game. Clearly, some have more than others.
Here the thing though...the 3rd party characters that folks talk about. Let's think about some of them...we've got Dante, Crash Bandicoot, Travis Touchdown, 2B, Ace Attorney, or Tekken...just to name a few.
Devil May Cry: 0 Characters, 0 stages, 0 music tracks, 0 ATs, 0 items
NieR Automata: 0 Characters, 0 stages, 0 music tracks, 0 ATs, 0 items
Crash Bandicoot: 0 Characters, 0 stages, 0 music tracks, 0 ATs, 0 items
No More Heroes: 0 Characters, 0 stages, 0 music tracks, 0 ATs, 0 items
Ace Attorney: 0 Characters, 0 stages, 0 music tracks, 0 ATs, 0 items
Tekken: 0 Characters, 0 stages, 0 music tracks, 0 ATs, 0 items
You get the point.
Now, I understand Smash started as a Nintendo crossover. It still is a Nintendo crossover. However, the series itself has grown, and 3rd party characters are a major reason for that. Smash isn't what it is today without 3rd party companies and developers. Nintendo isn't what it is today with 3rd party companies and developers. Smash has become something that stokes the crossover dreams of fans, so it's no wonder fans will think, "Oh boy, I wonder which new series will cross over next!"
It's like getting an Ice Cream cone with 9 scoops on it, and while the next person says, "Excuse me sir, can I get 1 scoop?" and then the person with 9 scoops say, "But wait, what about mine?"
There's nothing wrong with wanting more, but understand that others may not be as open to it when their favorite/most desired has literally nothing in Smash. Nearly every major Nintendo protagonist supporting crew member, and villain is in Smash, so it's not all that surprising that protagonists of larger/popular non-Nintendo series are getting added over lower tier Nintendo characters. That's not something that I'm placing my bias in, it's just where we're at.
That was...a lot to type. Just some food for thought. Mario, Zelda, Pokemon...they are among my favorites. I grew up with them. They're part of who I am. But I've played a lot of games over the years, and at least for me...considering the amount of content we already have, I'd be much more excited to see what we get from something like Devil May Cry as I would be seeing 10 more Mario songs added on top of the 100 we already have, you know?
Let's face it, we wouldn't have this type of disscussion if Spring Man wasn't an Assist. Hell, we didn't have this discussion at all in the base game. It all resorts to "Spring Man is boring therefore he's not the mascot"."SPRING MAN ISN'T THE MASCOT OF ARMS, THAT EMERGES OVER A LONG PERIOD OF TI-"
meanwhile the ARMS announcement trailer January 2017
Then the issue lies with Nintendo for not trying to make these franchises bigger. They managed to turn a franchise thsat was literally on the brink of death to one of their major IPs soley because they remembered to market it, Splatoon's marketing was hyper-aggressive to the point it became a major hit on a dying, failed console. If Nintendo's not interested in making people care about their smaller franchises, then obviously, their smaller franchises will get ignored in favour of the same 5 that get pumped out constantly.But if our focus shifts to just adding new franchises, then what does that leave us with for first-parties? Mainly a bunch of really small franchises that don't have the same support as the larger ones.
It wouldn't matter if BotW 2 had this really cool character that would be perfect for Smash. We have plenty of Zelda content. Doesn't matter if there's this new Pokemon/FE/XC character we really want in the next Smash game. All three are already on the roster, so that would be a let down. At this point, we've made the franchise more important than the character themselves.
I feel like if this is the stance people are going to take, they would be better off just saying, "Let's stick with third-parties from now on", because the number of notable franchises left to add is only getting smaller and smaller. Not that I genuinely believe the whole issue stems from wanting only unrepped franchises. ARMS had no characters, no stages, and no music, and yet the response ranged from somewhat positive to neutral.
Remember when people said that about Ryu, and then he came out, and is now considered one of the most mechanically interesting characters in the franchise?Let's face it, we wouldn't have this type of disscussion if Spring Man wasn't an Assist. Hell, we didn't have this discussion at all in the base game. It all resorts to "Spring Man is boring therefore he's not the mascot".
They said the same about Terry too. Ken with a Cap N' **** is what they called him. Guess no one thought of the idea of giving him desperation moves.Remember when people said that about Ryu, and then he came out, and is now considered one of the most mechanically interesting characters in the franchise?
I do.
Boredom got to me.They said the same about Terry too. Ken with a Cap N' **** is what they called him. Guess no one thought of the idea of giving him desperation moves.
...............Oh ****. Swampasaur it's you. Haven't seen you in this thread until now.
That analogy wasnt saying the series themselves were in line for ice cream, but the fans of said franchises or series.While most of my preferences lie with 3rd parties... I think your point is a bit misleading. You see, while most of the third parties you cited have no "ice cream scoops"... they were never guaranteed to get one. I see a lot of people acting like 1st parties are less hype as if Nintendo somehow promised us that we'd get nothing but guest characters (not you specifically, just a general sentiment I see in this thread). Maybe this is still some leftover bias from that one Reggie statement, I dunno. That's what has led me to say that some users are really taking third parties for granted.
So it's like... yeah, these series have no scoops, but they were never in line for one in the first place. Or at least, if they are, they're invisible to us until they're not. I believe that's the big difference - we'll always get more Nintendo characters because this is a Nintendo game. Other characters are cool and all when they happen, but we were never really promised anything in that regard, so if it doesn't happen... it doesn't happen and that's it.
Again, all of this is coming from someone whose favorite additions to the past three Smash games were all third party.
Honestly, I think a Zelda newcomer would go over well due to the lack of newcomers since... Brawl.My point was that, sure, you can want a 10th Mario character, but just realize that the guy who wanted Phoenix Wright doesn’t have any yet. That’s likely a reason as to why certain potential passes that include mostly Mario, Pokémon, and Zelda (or Fire Emblem) get the responses they do. They have a substantial amount of content already in Smash, whereas series such as the ones I listed, don’t.
It didn't help that people tried to make it sound like we have the moveset already too. Yes, just cause Mario/Luigi/Dr. Mario has shotoclone traits doesn't mean they fully have a similar moveset. There's more to it than specials(or a Down Air in Mario's case). In a sense, at least in Melee, they somewhat had them as their own equivalent to the shotoclones, due to having variations on the same moveset and all. But that's a different thing.Remember when people said that about Ryu, and then he came out, and is now considered one of the most mechanically interesting characters in the franchise?
I do.
You just claimed that Nintendo needs to do a better job of advertising their smaller IPs, only to say that it's no surprise that ARMS wasn't exciting because a lot of people ignored it.Then the issue lies with Nintendo for not trying to make these franchises bigger. They managed to turn a franchise thsat was literally on the brink of death to one of their major IPs soley because they remembered to market it, Splatoon's marketing was hyper-aggressive to the point it became a major hit on a dying, failed console. If Nintendo's not interested in making people care about their smaller franchises, then obviously, their smaller franchises will get ignored in favour of the same 5 that get pumped out constantly.
As to why people aren't excited about the moat represented franchises getting more representation, imagine eating your favourite food, it's great, right? Now imagine eating it all the time, not just every day, but every meal. You'd get sick of it and long for something else, even if it's the only consistent thing in the meals.
As for why ARMS got a lukewarm reception... Well, it's ARMS, a rather barebones game that the hardcore crowd collectively ignored to the point loads of people thought it was dead, it should be no surprise that it got a lukewarm reception compared to most newcomers