• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

Official Newcomer/DLC Speculation Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.

Animegamingnerd

Smash Ace
Joined
Dec 17, 2015
Messages
844
Location
Medford, Oregon
I lean towards not getting another western character. Banjo was likely pick simply due to the sheer overwhelming demand, something no other western third party has arguably reached. Then look at nintendo's relationship with the major Japanese third parties is much stronger, like take Square for example who have made several exclusives on the Switch and Nintendo heavily features their games in directs, Capcom while not porting a lot of their modern games (likely due to hardware limitations) is porting so much of their older games like RE, Monster Hunter Generations, Okami and even for the first time on a Nintendo platform DMC and Dragon's Dogma. Plus a lot of these companies like Bandai Namco, Capcom, Square and especially Atlus were big 3DS supporters were as western third party support was basically non-existent.

Right now the only big western third party supporters for the Switch is Bethesda and Ubisoft porting a decent of their older and some cases modern games to the system with Ubisoft even making an exclusive for the system with Mario + Rabbits, Activision counting both them and Blizzard have only about 5 games on the system with Nintendo more or so pushing the Blizzard side of Activision way more then any of the Skylanders or Crash games on the system, Meanwhile EA treats the Switch the same way that Martin Scorsese treats Marvel movies. MS has only given us three of their games being Ori, Cuphead, and Minecraft. Minecraft was on almost everything before MS bought Mojang and both Ori and Cuphead are from MS biggest franchise like Gears and Halo.

Looking at who Nintendo decided for FP1 gives me the vibe they want to promote games from companies they have a close working relationship with, which is why I lean towards Ubisoft or Bethesda before anyone else if we get another western rep and if we do it would probably be one of their most well know characters like Ezio or any of the Assassin's or for Bethesda, Dragon Born or Doom Slayer (the latter of whom is basically deconfirm if that interview is anything to go by). Though if the rumors of Halo on Switch are true, I can see Nintendo at the very least had suggested Master Chief to Sakurai.
 
Last edited:

perfectchaos83

Smash Champion
Joined
May 31, 2018
Messages
2,814
Then, Master Chief is next bet because they already worked with Microsoft for Banjo. It's easier to work with the same western company than new western company. And, Microsoft is already willing to put Chief into Smash since official Halo Twitter account showed that gif. The account is run by a guy, but he still had to get approval from higher up within Microsoft.
The people that control Halo are not the same people that control Banjo. Just because it's easy for one does not make it easy for the other. We've seen this already in Smash. Sonic team is far more peculiar about Sonic than the Bayonetta team is about Bayonetta. That's why Sonic's colors suck and Bayonetta's are great. It's also why Cloud's everything pales in comparison to DQ's treatment (among other things since it's a lot more complicated than that).
 
Last edited:

Lionfranky

Smash Lord
Joined
Oct 4, 2019
Messages
1,037
The people that control Halo are not the same people that control Banjo. Just because it's easy for one does not make it easy for the other. We've seen this already in Smash. Sonic team is far more peculiar about Sonic than the Bayonetta team is about Bayonetta. That's why Sonic's colors suck and Bayonetta
s are great. It's also why Cloud's everything pales in comparison to DQ's treatment (among other things since it's a lot more complicated than that).
True, but the way Phil Spencer seemed eager toward Banjo's inclusion may translate to Chief's inclusion. And that official Halo tweet most likely represents 343i's stance.
 

RileyXY1

Smash Hero
Joined
Jun 8, 2016
Messages
7,466
I don't know if they would put Halo on the Switch without Nintendo putting some of their own games on the XBox.
 

perfectchaos83

Smash Champion
Joined
May 31, 2018
Messages
2,814
So there's rumors that Lara was leaked for Brawlhalla.

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/234547-super-smash-bros-ultimate/78423904

Already there's people beliving she's disconfirmed because characters apparantly can only be in one crossover fighting game.
I'd argue people don't seem to understand the argument here. From a marketing standpoint, it means that there's competition. Brawlhalla and Smash are inherently similar games, which technically puts them in competition with one another. From Nintendo's pov, Lara in smash loses some impact because there's already a cheaper alternative to play as Lara in a similar game. It's far less to do with being a cross over fighting game and more to do with the inherent competition therein.

I don't know if they would put Halo on the Switch without Nintendo putting some of their own games on the XBox.
I doubt it because Xbox already said they were done porting their games to other systems.
 

RileyXY1

Smash Hero
Joined
Jun 8, 2016
Messages
7,466
I'd argue people don't seem to understand the argument here. From a marketing standpoint, it means that there's competition. Brawlhalla and Smash are inherently similar games, which technically puts them in competition with one another. From Nintendo's pov, Lara in smash loses some impact because there's already a cheaper alternative to play as Lara in a similar game. It's far less to do with being a cross over fighting game and more to do with the inherent competition therein.



I doubt it because Xbox already said they were done porting their games to other systems.
By that logic, both Heihachi and Dante are out because they were in PSASBR.
 

perfectchaos83

Smash Champion
Joined
May 31, 2018
Messages
2,814
By that logic, both Heihachi and Dante are out because they were in PSASBR.
PSABR is a defunct game from last Gen. It's not competition anymore. It's like saying Circuit City is still competition for Best Buy.
 
Last edited:

Kokiden

Smash Ace
Joined
Apr 24, 2019
Messages
782
So there's rumors that Lara was leaked for Brawlhalla.

https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/234547-super-smash-bros-ultimate/78423904

Already there's people beliving she's disconfirmed because characters apparantly can only be in one crossover fighting game.
I am baffled by the dumb logic some people are using in that thread.

The heck does being in one game, got to do with another?

Both games provide different experiences.

It's like saying no need to play Crash Racing because Mario Kart exists. Same concept but it's different enough to matter.
 

Animegamingnerd

Smash Ace
Joined
Dec 17, 2015
Messages
844
Location
Medford, Oregon
By that logic, both Heihachi and Dante are out because they were in PSASBR.
Now I don't believe in that argument for deconfirm. But PSASBR is deader then Smash Bros Brawl, it is far from a valid argument especially since Sony has seemingly no plans to ever to revisit it and the fact its online servers have been shut down and there is no way to play it on modern hardware.
 

Will

apustaja
Joined
Jan 18, 2014
Messages
33,936
Location
hell
Switch FC
SW-7573-2962-2407
I'm confident in the possibility of a western character, much like anyone else. I just know all of my money is on Travis happening sometime hopefully within it.
 

wynn728

Banned via Warnings
Joined
Jan 14, 2019
Messages
1,380
That's because Japan is an island that's at least one fourth the size of the US. Less distance will obviously means better connections, it has nothing to do with Japanese companies having a homefield preference.


The characters chosen for Smash have nothing to do with Nintendo or anybody preferring Japanese characters over western ones. If actuality, it has more to do with the fact that the majority of the most iconic video game characters just so happen created and owned by Japanese companies: :ultmegaman::ultryu::ultken: (Capcom, Japanese), :ultsonic::ultbayonetta::ultbayonetta1: (SEGA, Japanese), :ultsnake::ultsimon::ultrichter: (Konami, Japanese), :ultcloud::ulthero: (SquareEnix, Japanese), almost all of the goddamn Nintendo-owned characters.

But besides that, how can you unironically say that the 6 characters we'll be getting are going to be entirely catered towards Japanese audiences? Have you seriously forgotten that, in this game alone, we've gotten four characters that were either created by western developers (:ultdarksamus::ultkrool::ultbanjokazooie:) or were included to cater to the western fanbase? (:ultridley::ultdarksamus::ulthero:'s DQ8 skin)
Wynn, why do you do this?
Are we just going to forget how Sakurai states that he want to use Smash Bros to promote Japanese Games? Sakurai chose the characters to help make Japanese games be successful throughout the world. Which is a reason why western made characters have been either Mii Costumes (Assassin's Creed, Cuphead), Spirits (Ray-Man), or Assist Trophy (Shovel Knight).

Now when I say "catered towards Japanese audience" that doesn't mean it will only be focus on them (for the most part). In Japan they wanted K. Rool and Banjo as well, so not only did it cater to western audience it also catered to Japanese audience as well. And that's going to be the key thing, out of the six DLC character they're not going to be characters that the Japanese audience don't know about/don't care for. They don't care for Doom over there, so Doomguy is going to be a Mii Costume at best. Mortal Kombat for the most part isn't sold in Japan, so we're not going to get a Mortal Kombat character ever in Smash Bros. The only time they're going to put a character in that doesn't cater at all to the Japanese audience would be in the base game (like Ridley and Little Mac) so they don't have to sell those types of characters as DLC. So just like with all the characters in Vol 1 if they have a presence with the Japanese audience then they're most likely to be in Vol 2, if they don't interest the Japanese audience at all then they're not getting in.

It's going to be super rare to get another western made character, especially since Sakurai prefers to work with Japanese Studios since it's easier and there isn't a language barrier. The only western studio that has a chance of getting another western character in is Microsoft. Even then it still doesn't seem likely.
 
D

Deleted member

Guest
Are we also going to forget that Sakurai has to approve of the characters Nintendo chose and can veto them?
Are we also going to forget that Sakurai mentioned that he has yet to veto a character
 

Will

apustaja
Joined
Jan 18, 2014
Messages
33,936
Location
hell
Switch FC
SW-7573-2962-2407
Are we also going to forget that Sakurai mentioned that he has yet to veto a character
Funny how vetos are mentioned but we act like Byleth wasn't worth a veto.
 

wynn728

Banned via Warnings
Joined
Jan 14, 2019
Messages
1,380
Are we also going to forget that Sakurai mentioned that he has yet to veto a character
He ain't ever going to admit that. That would be a nightmare to handle. Think about it.

Funny how vetos are mentioned but we act like Byleth wasn't worth a veto.
That's because Sakurai loves Fire Emblem, of course he ain't going to veto Byleth.
 
Last edited:

Kokiden

Smash Ace
Joined
Apr 24, 2019
Messages
782
Are we also going to forget that Sakurai mentioned that he has yet to veto a character
Not trying to start something here, but didn't he kinda veto Heihachi?

Or was that something else entirely? I honestly don't know what happened with that. All I heard was he was close to getting chosen or something, but Sakurai said something about his moves being hard to translate into Smash?
 

N3ON

Gone Exploring
BRoomer
Joined
Jan 6, 2008
Messages
21,444
Location
Vancouver
I'd argue people don't seem to understand the argument here. From a marketing standpoint, it means that there's competition. Brawlhalla and Smash are inherently similar games, which technically puts them in competition with one another. From Nintendo's pov, Lara in smash loses some impact because there's already a cheaper alternative to play as Lara in a similar game. It's far less to do with being a cross over fighting game and more to do with the inherent competition therein.
From a marketing perspective, I can't imagine Brawlhalla is seen as genuine competition. Because there is no competition, Smash is not struggling to maintain the mindshare it boasts. Smash has such a dominance over its niche that no inclusion is going to be truly impeded financially by a prior inclusion in any other title of the same ilk.

I doubt it because Xbox already said they were done porting their games to other systems.
I wouldn't believe them if I were you.
 
D

Deleted member

Guest
Not trying to start something here, but didn't he kinda veto Heihachi?

Or was that something else entirely? I honestly don't know what happened with that. All I heard was he was close to getting chosen or something, but Sakurai said something about his moves being hard to translate into Smash?
This was during Smash 4, when Heihachi was added as a Mii Costume.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

N3ON

Gone Exploring
BRoomer
Joined
Jan 6, 2008
Messages
21,444
Location
Vancouver
That's because Sakurai loves Fire Emblem, of course he ain't going to veto Byleth.
He just said he thought there were too many FE characters and that Byleth wasn't even the one he wanted if there was to be another.

Even last time he said Corrin wasn't his idea either and intimated his concerns on the volume of FE characters.

These inclusions are clearly at the behest of other parties.
 

Will

apustaja
Joined
Jan 18, 2014
Messages
33,936
Location
hell
Switch FC
SW-7573-2962-2407
He ain't ever going to admit that. That would be a nightmare to handle. Think about it.
That's one hell of a flawed argument by assuming what Sakurai will do or won't do like you know the guy. If Sakurai would say that he could veto anything, why would he withdraw any account of doing so? It's likely that he accepts them without radical rejection.
 
Last edited:

3BitSaurus

Smash Master
Joined
May 6, 2019
Messages
4,298
Location
Nowhere (no, not the Islands)

GoodGrief741

Smash Legend
Joined
Sep 22, 2012
Messages
10,169
A Nintendo Direct has to happen next week or Zippo's credibility will vanish (And starving Nintendo fans will eat themselves).

Are people still calling the Knight "Hollow Knight"? Wake me up when everyone starts calling Young Zelda and Dark Metroid by their correct names.
Lmao because a nameless character from an indie game is a good comparison to Link and Samus?
Still two things stops Scorpion from possibility getting in.

Mortal Kombat not being localized in Japan.

Lacks popularity there.

Any possible counters to those?
My counter is that Mortal Kombat is such a legendary series that Japan's feelings on it shouldn't matter. There are other, just as legendary series that do have the bonus of being popular there so I won't be surprised if MK gets passed over, but if Sakurai hasn't even considered it then he's not doing his job of 'making the ultimate gaming crossover' properly.
 

Sabrewulf238

Smash Hero
Joined
Oct 17, 2007
Messages
5,164
Location
Ireland
I think if we do end up getting a western character in this pass it'll probably just be one. (maybe two at a stretch) At the very least I wouldn't expect some massive flood of western characters.

I feel like Rayman is in the best position right now. (and maybe Crash Bandicoot as well)
 

Evil Trapezium

Smash Master
Joined
May 16, 2019
Messages
3,291
NNID
GuyManRunnin
Switch FC
SW-2246-2414-0334
This has absolutely nothing to do with DMC, but it just struck me how many awesome anniversaries we have going on this year. Three of my all-time favorites - Majora's Mask, Paper Mario, and Pokemon Gold/Silver - all turn 20 this year! Time to buy a cake!

Red Dead Redemption turns 10, both God of War and Resident Evil 4 are turning 15, The Sims and Pro Skater 2 are each turning 20, Chrono Trigger is turning 25, Super Mario World is turning 30, and of course Pac-Man is finally over the hill.

This is a killer year for video game anniversaries. Here's hoping most (if not all) of these great titles are celebrated with Smash content!
Hey hey hey! How can you talk about anniversaries without letting me say...

TimeSplitters turns 20 this year!

YEAH! TIME TO SPLIT!
Time to split am I right fellas.gif
 
Last edited:

Dinoman96

Smash Master
Joined
Sep 22, 2013
Messages
3,339
I just don't see how Rayman is "in the best position".

I just don't see them adding a guest character whose vast majority of games never came out in Japan, and the ones that did sold very poorly.
 
Last edited:

Evil Trapezium

Smash Master
Joined
May 16, 2019
Messages
3,291
NNID
GuyManRunnin
Switch FC
SW-2246-2414-0334
Someday, we'll get TimeSplitters 4. Someday...
This is all I've got to hold on for now.


But it's so vague that it could be anything... even Cortez for Super Smash Bros Ultimate!
 

Diddy Kong

Smash Obsessed
Joined
Dec 8, 2004
Messages
26,315
Switch FC
SW-1597-979602774
Mortal Kombat could get a character yeah. I'm not even against it. I think fighting game characters make the most sense for a big fighting game crossover like Smash.
 
D

Deleted member

Guest
This is all I've got to hold on for now.


But it's so vague that it could be anything... even Cortez for Super Smash Bros Ultimate!
That...isn't quite reliable for you as of the moment. I mean, it could just be a new game or anything.
 

TheShiningAbsol

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Jan 9, 2020
Messages
328
Already there's people beliving she's disconfirmed because characters apparantly can only be in one crossover fighting game.
Weren’t people discrediting Terry and saying it couldn’t be him during the SNK leak because he’s a guest in like EX Layer or something? (I don’t know for sure, I don’t play real fighting games)... You’d think people would learn if so

Off topic, but I like your pfp
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom