• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

Official Newcomer/DLC Speculation Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.

SMAASH! Puppy

Smash Legend
Joined
Feb 13, 2015
Messages
13,356
Location
Snake Man's stage from Metal Blade Solid
Do you mean that I’m incorrect about how folks treat leakers, or just the wording I gave?

If you hope that people blindly believing leakers doesn’t become prominent, then I hate to to tell you, but...
Just your example sentiment. I don't even know how one comes to believe that such a premise can lead to a conclusion like that. I do know that people have been gathering around the leakers for while but I hope no one (or at least, very few people) thinks that leakers are the only thing short of a reveal that can make something possible. They can provide concrete evidence provided they're not mistaken or lying but even then it's a pretty big if and also not the only source of information.

It is rare to see the Newcomer thread with just three users online.
I think it usually happens from now 'till my early morning. EDIT: It's probably night time for most frequent users here.
 
Last edited:

N3ON

Gone Exploring
BRoomer
Joined
Jan 6, 2008
Messages
21,444
Location
Vancouver
I don’t think that statement is an outright deconfirmation for an MK character but I think the chances of one happening are extremely marginal at best anyway.
 

Scoliosis Jones

Kept you waiting, huh?
Writing Team
Joined
Aug 7, 2012
Messages
9,582
Location
Buffalo, New York
NNID
ScoliosisxJones
3DS FC
1762-3194-1826
It is rare to see the Newcomer thread with just three users online.
The perfect time for me to drop some information from my "sources":

So uh, yeah, I've been informed that the Treehouse staff, Bill Trinen, and Doug Bowser were seen drinking massive amounts of Pepsi during E3 2019.

Also something to consider...what do some folks do with empty Pepsi cans? They Smash them.

Yeah, I'm thinking he's in.

 

Koopaul

Smash Champion
Joined
Oct 29, 2013
Messages
2,336
Think about this. We got six fighters left. SIX. Six that Nintendo chose. I'm going to assume that very few of them are Western characters. 2 at the most. Maybe none. Now lets be generous and say there are two. Do you think out of the hundreds of Western characters that are available that Nintendo would pick a Mortal Kombat character?
 

Icedragonadam

Smash Master
Joined
Jul 16, 2014
Messages
4,093
Switch FC
SW-5227-6397-6112
The Mortal Kombat interview never meant anything to me as Mortal Kombat getting a rep was always less than 1% in my eyes. A series built on bloody gory deaths where most of the games aren't even released in Japan won't get you far into Smash.
 

ChunkySlugger72

Smash Lord
Joined
Jul 2, 2018
Messages
1,834
Think about this. We got six fighters left. SIX. Six that Nintendo chose. I'm going to assume that very few of them are Western characters. 2 at the most. Maybe none. Now lets be generous and say there are two. Do you think out of the hundreds of Western characters that are available that Nintendo would pick a Mortal Kombat character?
I agree, Based on how Sakurai mentioned "Western Characters" and how he would be interested in them more when Banjo-Kazooie made it in.

At most I think we'll get 2, But I honestly believe we will at least get 1 minimum and my gut is telling me that the safest picks regarding western representation has gotta be Crash Bandicoot and Rayman.

Master Chief would be my 3rd "Wild Card" choice, Not as likely as Crash and Rayman, But still very possible.

What more can be said that hasn't been said about Crash Bandicoot? He seems like a no brainer and checks off a lot of boxes on what it usually takes to get into a game like Super Smash Bros, Makes the most sense and seems like the most obvious choice to represent a big 3rd Party company like Activision.

Rayman may not be the biggest name, But is still a significant character in gaming and the company mascot of a big 3rd party company like Ubisoft who has strong partnership with Nintendo, Not to mention those mii costumes of Rabbids and Assassins Creed show that Nintendo and Ubisoft are still making deals big and small and seems like it will eventually lead to Rayman.

I'd put money that at least one of these 2 are almost a guaranteed lock for Season 2.
 
Last edited:

SMAASH! Puppy

Smash Legend
Joined
Feb 13, 2015
Messages
13,356
Location
Snake Man's stage from Metal Blade Solid
The most likely western rep I think is Crash and Master Chief.

More likely Crash tbh.
I think Lara's got a shot as well. She doesn't seem to be as wanted here but she has her merits and Nintendo's worked with the company that owns her for two characters already. That's not to say there wouldn't be any complications with her or that she's the most likely but I think she's worth considering.

And maybe she'll be the first SquareEnix character that gets more than two songs. *snicker snicker*
 

ChunkySlugger72

Smash Lord
Joined
Jul 2, 2018
Messages
1,834
I think Lara's got a shot as well. She doesn't seem to be as wanted here but she has her merits and Nintendo's worked with the company that owns her for two characters already. That's not to say there wouldn't be any complications with her or that she's the most likely but I think she's worth considering.

And maybe she'll be the first SquareEnix character that gets more than two songs. *snicker snicker*
Lara Croft is worthy and definitely iconic, But I feel that the Tomb Raider franchise resonates with more mature gamers and the Playstation crowd than Nintendo's which probably explains the lack of support for her.

While Crash Bandicoot is the former defacto Playstation mascot, I feel that he's a more appealing pick to the Nintendo crowd (Along with Spyro) because they love their platformers and feels like a better fit with the majority of the cast among the likes of Mario, Yoshi, DK, Sonic and Banjo-Kazooie etc.

Not to mention many want to see him duke out with Mario as his rivalry is only 2nd to Sonic's historic feud with the Italian plumber.

If this was Playstation All-Stars Battle Royale 2 then it would be a completely different story.
 
Last edited:

PLATINUM7

Star Platinum
Joined
Nov 15, 2013
Messages
12,208
NNID
PLATINUM7
3DS FC
1246-8735-0293
Switch FC
2465-5306-3806
Lara Croft is worthy and definitely iconic, But I feel that the Tomb Raider franchise resonates with more mature gamers and the Playstation crowd than Nintendo's which probably explains the lack of support for her.

While Crash Bandicoot is the former defacto Playstation mascot, I feel that he's a more appealing pick to the Nintendo crowd (Along with Spyro) because they love their platformers and feels like a better fit with the majority of the cast among the likes of Mario, Yoshi, DK, Sonic and Banjo-Kazooie etc.

Not to mention many want to see him duke out with Mario as his rivalry is only 2nd to Sonic's historic feud with the Italian plumber.

If this was Playstation All-Stars Battle Royale 2 then it would be a completely different story.
I expect just about every third party to be more likely for Smash than a PSASBR2.
 
Last edited:

Koopaul

Smash Champion
Joined
Oct 29, 2013
Messages
2,336
Lara Croft is worthy and definitely iconic, But I feel that the Tomb Raider franchise resonates with more mature gamers and the Playstation crowd than Nintendo's which probably explains the lack of support for her.

While Crash Bandicoot is the former defacto Playstation mascot, I feel that he's a more appealing pick to the Nintendo crowd (Along with Spyro) because they love their platformers and feels like a better fit with the majority of the cast among the likes of Mario, Yoshi, DK, Sonic and Banjo-Kazooie etc.

Not to mention many want to see him duke out with Mario as his rivalry is only 2nd to Sonic's historic feud with the Italian plumber.

If this was Playstation All-Stars Battle Royale 2 then it would be a completely different story.
That didn't stop Snake. We got Snake and NOT Bomberman. Something to think about.
 

Idon

Smash Legend
Joined
May 24, 2018
Messages
17,725
Location
Waxing Moon Ritual
NNID
Miyamoto Iori
Switch FC
SW-4826-9581-3305
That didn't stop Snake. We got Snake and NOT Bomberman. Something to think about.
Well Snake did have Kojima go out of his way to ask Sakurai to put in Snake. Dunno if the same would be possible for Lara.
 

Will

apustaja
Joined
Jan 18, 2014
Messages
33,934
Location
hell
Switch FC
SW-7573-2962-2407
That didn't stop Snake. We got Snake and NOT Bomberman. Something to think about.
If you beg for seven years you'll probably get in. Considering Travis is a Nintendo kinda-exclusive, wouldn't be surprised if he would join in because of it.
 

Koopaul

Smash Champion
Joined
Oct 29, 2013
Messages
2,336
Well Snake did have Kojima go out of his way to ask Sakurai to put in Snake. Dunno if the same would be possible for Lara.
Well ChunkySlugger72 ChunkySlugger72 argument was that being mature and associated with Playstation will hurt a characters chances while being a cartoony mascot will increase your chances. There's lots to suggest that's not the case.
 

Cutie Gwen

Lovely warrior
Joined
Jul 1, 2014
Messages
63,864
Location
Somewhere out there on this big blue marble
Think about this. We got six fighters left. SIX. Six that Nintendo chose. I'm going to assume that very few of them are Western characters. 2 at the most. Maybe none. Now lets be generous and say there are two. Do you think out of the hundreds of Western characters that are available that Nintendo would pick a Mortal Kombat character?
Slightly offtopic but considering we now know how Nintendo and Sakurai deal with picking the DLC, I just realized the biggest argument against Western characters kinda doesn't exist, a veto system would make Sakurai seem incredibly petty as Nintendo would say "Hey here's this character we're willing to negotiate for, should we go for it?" for anyone in this veto system
 

Will

apustaja
Joined
Jan 18, 2014
Messages
33,934
Location
hell
Switch FC
SW-7573-2962-2407
A series built on bloody gory deaths where most of the games aren't even released in Japan won't get you far into Smash.
And we want Doomguy because? :217: The Japanese audience literally sees Doomguy as another Samus like how we see anyone with a sword as Marth.
 
Last edited:

wynn728

Banned via Warnings
Joined
Jan 14, 2019
Messages
1,380
Think about this. We got six fighters left. SIX. Six that Nintendo chose. I'm going to assume that very few of them are Western characters. 2 at the most. Maybe none. Now lets be generous and say there are two. Do you think out of the hundreds of Western characters that are available that Nintendo would pick a Mortal Kombat character?
If they put a western character then it's going to be a character that has appeal to the Japanese audience. Games like Doom and Mortal Kombat have no presence in Japan, so they're not going to happen. For Nintendo & Sakurai it's a 100% okay to add character that only have presence Japan, like how Fire Emblem didn't release outside of Japan when Melee was happening and how Mother 3 is still exclusive in Japan, because that's who they really want to appeal to. Looking at the Fighters Pass Vol 1 each character has presence for the Japanese audience (including Banjo). They're not going to make a DLC character that doesn't appeal to the Japanese fans since they will most likely not buy it.

But I also doubt they're going to include another western character in Smash. It took 20 years to get just one and it's only because Microsoft and Rare were really pushing for Banjo so much that they were easy to work with. Doesn't seem like they're going to really bother getting more characters like that unless the circumstances are favorable.
 

Will

apustaja
Joined
Jan 18, 2014
Messages
33,934
Location
hell
Switch FC
SW-7573-2962-2407
If they put a western character then it's going to be a character that has appeal to the Japanese audience. Games like Doom and Mortal Kombat have no presence in Japan, so they're not going to happen. For Nintendo & Sakurai it's a 100% okay to add character that only have presence Japan, like how Fire Emblem didn't release outside of Japan when Melee was happening and how Mother 3 is still exclusive in Japan, because that's who they really want to appeal to. Looking at the Fighters Pass Vol 1 each character has presence for the Japanese audience (including Banjo). They're not going to make a DLC character that doesn't appeal to the Japanese fans since they will most likely not buy it.

But I also doubt they're going to include another western character in Smash. It took 20 years to get just one and it's only because Microsoft and Rare were really pushing for Banjo so much that they were easy to work with. Doesn't seem like they're going to really bother getting more characters like that unless the circumstances are favorable.
So pessimistic, you lots. :4pacman: We won't know until it's shown. Could be Skyrim in there for all we know, Todd Howard's gonna shove it down our throats for the twelfth time.
 

Dark Bagel

Smash Ace
Joined
Aug 3, 2019
Messages
718
Location
Beyond time and space
I agree, Based on how Sakurai mentioned "Western Characters" and how he would be interested in them more when Banjo-Kazooie made it in.

At most I think we'll get 2, But I honestly believe we will at least get 1 minimum and my gut is telling me that the safest picks regarding western representation has gotta be Crash Bandicoot and Rayman.

Master Chief would be my 3rd "Wild Card" choice, Not as likely as Crash and Rayman, But still very possible.

What more can be said that hasn't been said about Crash Bandicoot? He seems like a no brainer and checks off a lot of boxes on what it usually takes to get into a game like Super Smash Bros, Makes the most sense and seems like the most obvious choice to represent a big 3rd Party company like Activision.

Rayman may not be the biggest name, But is still a significant character in gaming and the company mascot of a big 3rd party company like Ubisoft who has strong partnership with Nintendo, Not to mention those mii costumes of Rabbids and Assassins Creed show that Nintendo and Ubisoft are still making deals big and small and seems like it will eventually lead to Rayman.

I'd put money that at least one of these 2 are almost a guaranteed lock for Season 2.
While I would be careful about using the word "lock" ANYWHERE near speculation, since countless seemingly-surefire predictions time and time again have been choppled, sliced, strangled, and schmeckledorfed by Sakurai and co, I definitely agree with you that Crash is arguably the top-dog contender for Western representation in Fighter pass 2, along with Rayman as a close second. Other westies that I think are worth mentioning that aren't hugely talked about within the speculation scene include Chell, as well as Ratchet & Clank, potential characters that hold their own merits in the realm of Smash's possibility.
 

ChunkySlugger72

Smash Lord
Joined
Jul 2, 2018
Messages
1,834
Well ChunkySlugger72 ChunkySlugger72 argument was that being mature and associated with Playstation will hurt a characters chances while being a cartoony mascot will increase your chances. There's lots to suggest that's not the case.
I understand where you are coming from, But I never said that she didn't have a chance, All I said is why she lacks fan support regarding Super Smash Bros.

I"ve seen numerous times people post here "Why a character as iconic as Lara Croft doesn't get as much fan support ?" And what I posted before is the reason I think why.
 
Last edited:

wynn728

Banned via Warnings
Joined
Jan 14, 2019
Messages
1,380
And we want Doomguy because? :217: The Japanese audience literally sees Doomguy as another Samus like how we see anyone with a sword as Marth.
Guess what, what the Japanese audience think about a character is a thousand time more important what the western audience think of a character for Nintendo & Sakurai. Especially for DLC. We got character who's games never released outside of Japan, look at Fire Emblem during Melee and how Mother 3 is still Japanese exclusive. We already a character that only appeals to the western audience, Ridley, they satisfied that need so they're not going to focus on that.
 

ChunkySlugger72

Smash Lord
Joined
Jul 2, 2018
Messages
1,834
While I would be careful about using the word "lock" ANYWHERE near speculation, since countless seemingly-surefire predictions time and time again have been choppled, sliced, strangled, and schmeckledorfed by Sakurai and co, I definitely agree with you that Crash is arguably the top-dog contender for Western representation in Fighter pass 2, along with Rayman as a close second. Other westies that I think are worth mentioning that aren't hugely talked about within the speculation scene include Chell, as well as Ratchet & Clank, potential characters that hold their own merits in the realm of Smash's possibility.
Which is why I said "Almost", Before I said guaranteed lock.

Ratchet & Clank would be sweet as they can use Playstation All-Stars Battle Royale as a base, While not impossible, It's very unlikely Sony will be involved as I would think they would rather do a sequel to PASBR then work with Nintendo regarding Smash.

I'm trying to be realistic with my predictions.
 

wynn728

Banned via Warnings
Joined
Jan 14, 2019
Messages
1,380
So pessimistic, you lots. :4pacman: We won't know until it's shown. Could be Skyrim in there for all we know, Todd Howard's gonna shove it down our throats for the twelfth time.
Not pessimistic, it's realistic. Japanese Developers don't give a crap about the west, that's a reason why the netcode for Street Fighter V is so bad. They really cater to the Japanese audience, and the same is going to happen in Vol 2. We have so many examples of this being the case that it's a safe guess.
 

TheShiningAbsol

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Jan 9, 2020
Messages
328
So pessimistic, you lots. :4pacman: We won't know until it's shown. Could be Skyrim in there for all we know, Todd Howard's gonna shove it down our throats for the twelfth time.
I still think Dragonborn is one of the most slept-on western characters. And I'm definitely not biased at all, I swear.

Also, Skyrim's only really technically been ported twice, three times if you want to count Skyrim VR
 
Last edited:

Koopaul

Smash Champion
Joined
Oct 29, 2013
Messages
2,336
Slightly offtopic but considering we now know how Nintendo and Sakurai deal with picking the DLC, I just realized the biggest argument against Western characters kinda doesn't exist, a veto system would make Sakurai seem incredibly petty as Nintendo would say "Hey here's this character we're willing to negotiate for, should we go for it?" for anyone in this veto system
I don't think there's a veto system. It's just about what is likely and unlikely. And it's just more likely that Japanese characters would be picked over a western one for a number of reasons.
 

AntagonisticGalaxyCetacea

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Oct 5, 2018
Messages
496
Not pessimistic, it's realistic. Japanese Developers don't give a crap about the west, that's a reason why the netcode for Street Fighter V is so bad. They really cater to the Japanese audience, and the same is going to happen in Vol 2. We have so many examples of this being the case that it's a safe guess.
What connection does SFV's horrible netcode have anything to do with Nintendo choosing characters for Smash's DLC? SFV's netcode has been awful since the game was in the beta phases, even for Japan. Has nothing to do with them catering to audiences.
 

wynn728

Banned via Warnings
Joined
Jan 14, 2019
Messages
1,380
What connection does SFV's horrible netcode have anything to do with Nintendo choosing characters for Smash's DLC? SFV's netcode has been awful since the game was in the beta phases, even for Japan. Has nothing to do with them catering to audiences.
It's an example how Japanese Studios (like Nintendo & Capcom) make decisions that are more in favor for their Japanese audiences. The Netcode that Capcom use for SFV is more in beneficial for players in Japan. So seeing how many Japanese Studios have that kind of mindset (including Nintendo with a lot of their games) means that when Nintendo is picking out characters they're going to pick the ones that really appear to the Japanese audience.
 

Lionfranky

Smash Lord
Joined
Oct 4, 2019
Messages
1,037
Not pessimistic, it's realistic. Japanese Developers don't give a crap about the west, that's a reason why the netcode for Street Fighter V is so bad. They really cater to the Japanese audience, and the same is going to happen in Vol 2. We have so many examples of this being the case that it's a safe guess.
It's weird since more than half of sales come from non-Japan territory. Just because it has been like that doesn't mean it will stay that way though.
 

TheCJBrine

Smash Legend
Joined
Jul 28, 2013
Messages
12,142
Location
New World, Minecraft
Guess what, what the Japanese audience think about a character is a thousand time more important what the western audience think of a character for Nintendo & Sakurai. Especially for DLC. We got character who's games never released outside of Japan, look at Fire Emblem during Melee and how Mother 3 is still Japanese exclusive. We already a character that only appeals to the western audience, Ridley, they satisfied that need so they're not going to focus on that.
They were actually considering cutting the Fire Emblem stuff in Melee’s English localization but decided to keep it. Sakurai added Lucas to Brawl because he didn’t know Mother 3 wouldn’t be localized, and removed him in Smash 4 only to bring him back as DLC because he was a fan-favorite. While Mother 3 doesn’t have an official localization, I’m pretty sure Nintendo is aware of the fan translation and then there’s the Mother 3 joke they had at one E3 and Reggie still being unable to escape the joke questions even after retiring.

There’s also Banjo & Kazooie, which while yes had some Japanese popularity, had a whole lot of Western fan demand and they even wanted Kirkhope to arrange a remix, making him the first Western composer to work on Smash, so with this along with the other stuff I mentioned, I’m sure they do give a crap about the West even if they still want to appeal to Japan at least somewhat (and why wouldn’t they? They’re a Japanese company). It should be obvious that they care about the West, anyway, as they’d want to sell/listen to us as well to keep making more cash.
 
Last edited:

TheShiningAbsol

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Jan 9, 2020
Messages
328
It's an example how Japanese Studios (like Nintendo & Capcom) make decisions that are more in favor for their Japanese audiences. The Netcode that Capcom use for SFV is more in beneficial for players in Japan. So seeing how many Japanese Studios have that kind of mindset (including Nintendo with a lot of their games) means that when Nintendo is picking out characters they're going to pick the ones that really appear to the Japanese audience.
I agree with a lot of your takes most of the time, but this is literally comparing apples to oranges and then saying, “well, they’re both fruit”. Capcom’s usual incompetence has nothing to do with Smash.
 
Last edited:

Cutie Gwen

Lovely warrior
Joined
Jul 1, 2014
Messages
63,864
Location
Somewhere out there on this big blue marble
I don't think there's a veto system. It's just about what is likely and unlikely. And it's just more likely that Japanese characters would be picked over a western one for a number of reasons.
Sakurai's latest Famitsu colomn said Nintendo suggests the character and Sakurai then makes the final decision, strongly implying a veto system
 

wynn728

Banned via Warnings
Joined
Jan 14, 2019
Messages
1,380
It's weird since more than half of sales come from non-Japan territory. Just because it has been like that doesn't mean it will stay that way though.
Some things are too stubborn to change.
 
Last edited:

MisterMike

Smash Champion
Joined
Jul 22, 2019
Messages
2,252
The Netcode that Capcom use for SFV is more in beneficial for players in Japan.
That's because Japan is an island that's at least one fourth the size of the US. Less distance will obviously means better connections, it has nothing to do with Japanese companies having a homefield preference.

So seeing how many Japanese Studios have that kind of mindset (including Nintendo with a lot of their games) means that when Nintendo is picking out characters they're going to pick the ones that really appeal to the Japanese audience.
The characters chosen for Smash have nothing to do with Nintendo or anybody preferring Japanese characters over western ones. If actuality, it has more to do with the fact that the majority of the most iconic video game characters just so happen created and owned by Japanese companies: :ultmegaman::ultryu::ultken: (Capcom, Japanese), :ultsonic::ultbayonetta::ultbayonetta1: (SEGA, Japanese), :ultsnake::ultsimon::ultrichter: (Konami, Japanese), :ultcloud::ulthero: (SquareEnix, Japanese), almost all of the goddamn Nintendo-owned characters.

But besides that, how can you unironically say that the 6 characters we'll be getting are going to be entirely catered towards Japanese audiences? Have you seriously forgotten that, in this game alone, we've gotten four characters that were either created by western developers (:ultdarksamus::ultkrool::ultbanjokazooie:) or were included to cater to the western fanbase? (:ultridley::ultdarksamus::ulthero:'s DQ8 skin)
Wynn, why do you do this?
 
Last edited:

perfectchaos83

Smash Champion
Joined
May 31, 2018
Messages
2,814
That's because Japan is an island that's at least one fourth the size of the US. Less distance will obviously means better connections, it has nothing to do with Japanese companies having a homefield preference.


The characters chosen for Smash have nothing to do with Nintendo or anybody preferring Japanese characters over western ones. If actuality, it has more to do with the fact that the majority of the most iconic video game characters just so happen created and owned by Japanese companies: :ultmegaman::ultryu::ultken: (Capcom, Japanese), :ultsonic::ultbayonetta::ultbayonetta1: (SEGA, Japanese), :ultsnake::ultsimon::ultrichter: (Konami, Japanese), :ultcloud::ulthero: (SquareEnix, Japanese), almost all of the goddamn Nintendo-owned characters.

But besides that, how can you unironically say that the 6 characters we'll be getting are going to be entirely catered towards Japanese audiences? Have you seriously forgotten that, in this game alone, we've gotten four characters that were either created by western developers (:ultdarksamus::ultkrool::ultbanjokazooie:) or were included to cater to the western fanbase? (:ultridley::ultdarksamus::ulthero:'s DQ8 skin)
Wynn, why do you do this?
Simply put, Japanese companies have a far easier time dealing with Japanese companies. That's mainly the issue. After over 20 years, we only just now got our first western owned character in Smash and even then there's enough reason to justify some sort of exception for Banjo.

Personally, I expect, at most, one western character in this next batch.
 

Lionfranky

Smash Lord
Joined
Oct 4, 2019
Messages
1,037
Simply put, Japanese companies have a far easier time dealing with Japanese companies. That's mainly the issue. After over 20 years, we only just now got our first western owned character in Smash and even then there's enough reason to justify some sort of exception for Banjo.

Personally, I expect, at most, one western character in this next batch.
Then, Master Chief is next bet because they already worked with Microsoft for Banjo. It's easier to work with the same western company than new western company. And, Microsoft is already willing to put Chief into Smash since official Halo Twitter account showed that gif. The account is run by a guy, but he still had to get approval from higher up within Microsoft.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom