I recall his first game on the Playstation sold as many as any Mario games IIRC. Somewhere around those lines at least.
The 3 original Crash Bandicoot games are among the 10 best selling games of the Playstation.
And the N. Sane trilogy sold more than 10 million units.
Honestly I don't really see Crash as a "gaming icon". His first 3 games where huge success, but he never have a really huge influence in the industry like the other huge Playstation games (Gran Turismo, Tomb raider, Resident evil, Metal gear solid, Final fantasy 7). He was also completely forgotten for like 15 years because he didn't have any games, and his other game were mediocre. Sure he's kind of back because of the N.sane trilogy, but I don't know, he might just die out again if his game restart to be mediocre.
I don't think he have no chance to be in Smash, I just think that a lot of the Smash fanabse is over estimating his influence and how big he is.
I guess it's because each one of us has a different experience and a different perception about a character or a franchise, I for example never heard of Banjo during the PSOne-N64 days. That probably was because I didn't own a N64 back then and I didn't know anyone who had the console.
About Crash... I honestly think some folks here are underestimating the character and his impact back then. First of all, not being Mario in terms of popularity isn't a bad thing, I mean... it's ****ing Mario.
Yeah, the character was dead for a good amount of years, but even during those years people still remembered him and asking Activision and even Sony to bring him back or something. Of all the retro/classic characters with demand to be brought back Crash was by far the most popular one.
I think that some people who don't find Crash that big of a deal is because they only owned Nintendo consoles or are people that only cares about Nintendo related things. Not saying this as something bad! I'm saying this because I'm a bit shocked that some people seem to think Crash is not more popular than characters like Banjo when overall if we don't talk from a Nintendo viewpoint Crash is way bigger than B&K.
Not talking about the character itself and how he would play in Smash. That's a different story but I will say that not every character in the roster needs to have a gimmick or a super complex moveset to be cool, fun and interesting. Also, sometimes you choose to play with
that character because you genuinely like him.
His original games maybe weren't revolutionary. As someone who played these games back then a lot of times, I wouldn't describe these games as influential or revolutionary. But I don't think that a game being a landmark in gaming is a requirement to be good. If that was the case we would only talk about very few characters. And of course, a character can be famous and recognizable enough even if his games were bad.
I know this is a thing that people says a lot, but it's true: if the original Playstation had a mascot that was Crash Bandicoot. People associated him with the brand and lol, A LOT of people still thinks that Crash is a Sony owned character even when the N. Sane Trilogy is available on Xbox One, Switch, PC and of course, the PS4. Even in this very thread I see people from time to time talking about him as if he was a Sony rep, lol.
I mean... I think that all of that for a "character that was completely forgotten during 15 years" talks only good things for Crash as a gaming figure. We all have different opinions, but I honestly think there's no discussion: Crash is a gaming icon (and one who resisted extremely well his years of inactivity unlike characters like Lara Croft) and he would be without a question a big deal, maybe even bigger than Banjo even if he's not owned by Microsoft or Sony. Crash definitely has the star power to headline the E3 as DLC or to be the first character in the pass.
Besides all of that, of course it also helps the fact that he was a Playstation character back then, so his inclusion would be very similar to Cloud in some level. The Sony vs Nintendo rivalry and all that. The difference is that no one was expecting Cloud as a serious contender for DLC a few years ago, Crash in the other hand is almost considered a lock from some people. If you ask me no one is a lock and the same goes for Crash, but Crash is definitely the first option that comes to my mind when I think of a new western character with realistic chances to make it.
Yes. Most of the demand for Crash started in the last 2 years, but his demand being recent doesn't mean that he wasn't a popular character before that. Of course, the release of the N. Sane Trilogy helped to that but if anything people started to see in the last years that a lot of third party characters were fair game for Smash and the announcement of Joker probably helped to reinforce a lot more that feeling.
Not having demand for Smash =/= lack of popularity and iconicity