Vrbtm
Banned via Administration
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2016
- Messages
- 403
This is what I'm talking about.It's not subjective
It's factually wrong, but I don't expect a child like you to understand that
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
This is what I'm talking about.It's not subjective
It's factually wrong, but I don't expect a child like you to understand that
That's false since the series has gained more sales over the years and I really doubt adding more non-family friendly characters would hurt it.Smash is best as a family friendly series.
If your only argument is "That's subjective," don't even bother. Waste of time.
....excuse me?Then every argument you guys have made about precedent is now invalid.
M-rated characters being in the game can't be used as an argument to add more now, thanks to you.
Because a lot of children play Smash, and I don't think they should be encouraged to play games that are too violent or sexual for them, which Smash does.I agree, that would be a waste of a time. I think it would be better to ask why you think this is the case.
So, why do you think this is the case?
It has absolutely nothing to do with hurting sales. I don't care about that at all, and in fact, it probably only makes my point stronger.That's false since the series has gained more sales over the years and I really doubt adding more non-family friendly characters would hurt it.
You don't really elaborate your points, tell us why it should be a family friendly series.
Just like M-rated characters being in the game isn't an automatic ticket for Master Chief, Lara Croft, and Doom Slayer. Yet a lot of you seem to think so anyway.My point was that Goku wasn't an automatic ticket for others of his type due to circumstances. They'd still have to go through a similar situation to even be considered.
Yes.Dude. Bay-o-****in'-netta is not a kid friendly character in the slightest!
But you already said that precedent doesn't matter, which makes absolutely zero sense.
What if Google theory is real (or if not, but this happens anyway) and Doom Slayer makes it in the game?
Will it be just another mistake that won't happen again?
That's all I've been doing, though.He's not gonna back up his arguements.
You don't even have an arguement. This is all you've been doing.Just like M-rated characters being in the game isn't an automatic ticket for Master Chief, Lara Croft, and Doom Slayer. Yet a lot of you seem to think so anyway.
Yes.
That's all I can say.
I would be severely disappointed if Doom Slayer got in, and the only thing I could do is not pay for the DLC and hope they don't make the same mistake in the future.
That's all I've been doing, though.
My most wanted character was Simon, and I don't particularly want or care for anyone else. I've gotten everyone I ever wanted. I'm happy.He just wants to be pissy about whatever z list garbage he wanted got tossed aside in favor of picks that cause excitement
damn, you're a even a hypocrite!My most wanted character was Simon, and I don't particularly want or care for anyone else. I've gotten everyone I ever wanted. I'm happy.
You're not thinking about the children, you're using them as a shieldIs thinking of the children a bad thing, or something?
What's wrong with you?
How so?damn, you're a even a hypocrite!
Castlevania is a violent, bloody series that usually either really pushes that Teen rating or is straight up M rated.How so?
How embarrassing.Castlevania is a violent, bloody series that usually either really pushes that Teen rating or is straight up M rated.
By your logic Simon shouldn't be in Smash since the children will play the Castlevania games which are filled with Gore, blood, violence and horror elements.How so?
Castlevania has practically no gore whatsoever and isn't even scary.By your logic Simon shouldn't be in Smash since the children will play the Castlevania games which are filled with Gore, blood, violence and horror elements.
- Master Chief is from an M-rated series of FPS games which may not be the most violent on the market, but are still too family unfriendly for Smash. He has no place, and isn't worth discussing. Same with Nathan Drake and Lara Croft (the latter of whom is misogyny incarnate), although less so. Same with Resident Evil, but even more so.
- Phoenix Wright and Professor Layton are decent, if boring, choices. The problem is that they're incredibly niche and unsexy to anyone except for their cult fanbases. Same with Monster Hunter, who would just be another boring swordfighter.
- Crash needs Spyro in a crossover game like this, and nobody wants both of them. What a waste that would be.
- Erdrick is all but confirmed, I'll give you that.
- Heihachi has been deconfirmed by Pac-Man's Namco Roulette taunt. Jin is whatever.
- Mortal Kombat is simply too violent for Smash.
There's around 7 billion people alive on planet Earth right now.His Final Smash would have to be the BFG. It can't be anything else.
But they can't call it "BFG," because the "F" stands for a word that you can't even use on this forum, let alone in Smash.
How do you wriggle out of that one?
The kinds of arguments you're making shouldn't be made by anyone over the age of alive.Depending on how old he is, it'll put me at ease. The kinds of arguments he's making shouldn't be made by anyone over 18.
You appear to still have no idea.Thanks, I had no ****ing idea.
Castlevania 2 was about gathering Dracula's body parts and putting them together to murder him againCastlevania has practically no gore whatsoever and isn't even scary.
Blood, sure, but blood isn't a big deal. Just gore.
This post just made me feel more right.View attachment 221112
There's around 7 billion people alive on planet Earth right now.
If something is not a problem for any of those 7 billion, except for you, then it's not a problem.
The kinds of arguments you're making shouldn't be made by anyone over the age of alive.
You appear to still have no idea.
And?Castlevania 2 was about gathering Dracula's body parts and putting them together to murder him again
One of the bosses in SOTN is a giant rotting corpse and many zombies enemies appear in the series. Alucard and the belmonts slice enemies in half and there are corpses lying around and even hanging. As for horror elements it has monsters fro classic horror movies and myths.Castlevania has no gore whatsoever and isn't even scary.
Blood, sure, but blood isn't a big deal. Just gore.
That boss doesn't appear in Smash, so I don't care. Alucard isn't even playable.One of the bosses in SOTN is a giant rotting corpse and many zombies enemies appear in the series. Alucard and the belmonts slice enemies in half and there are corpses lying around and even hanging.
He had it coming. Did Dracula think he could get away with cursing Simon before dying?Castlevania 2 was about gathering Dracula's body parts and putting them together to murder him again
Except no one is saying that? Like literally no one is saying that just because we have M-Rated characters that a bunch are automatically going to show up.Just like M-rated characters being in the game isn't an automatic ticket for Master Chief, Lara Croft, and Doom Slayer. Yet a lot of you seem to think so anyway.
Dracula should have just griefed Simon's Minecraft serverHe had it coming. Did Dracula think he could get away with cursing Simon before dying?
That's it I'm done, I'm convinced he's trolling 100% now.That boss doesn't appear in Smash, so I don't care. Alucard isn't even playable.
It's also not that violent or disturbing at all in any case. Zombies are extremely generic and family friendly. Don't be ****ing ridiculous.
If he wasn't already an item, he'd be one of my top picks for sure.so who else thinks sandbag is actually a viable candidate as an off-the-wall sakurai pick
i mean look at him
what a mad lad
Zombies are about as family unfriendly as a bat, or a skeleton. We're not talking about 28 Days Later here, we're talking about Castlevania.That's it I'm done, I'm convinced he's trolling 100% now.
And that’s why I’m now supporting Scorpion and Sub-Zero for Smash.You can claim they don't belong all you want. Doesn't change that they are still possible.
I think it would just be migraine-inducing. I like that we have a list of characters who we can point to and say they're 99% not making it. Keeps things more simple.I want those fanrules dead as a doornail. It would do wonders for speculation.
"Introducing the new Homerun Contest! Since Sandbag is playable now, you can simply select any character to K.O. in his place!"I'd still love Sandbag to be playable and an item. Maybe just don't let him be in Home Run Contest? It's not the most important mode.
It would be interesting to see Smash veterans as Assist Trophies or Pokeball Pokemon.I'd still love Sandbag to be playable and an item. Maybe just don't let him be in Home Run Contest? It's not the most important mode.
Likewise, I'd be more than okay with Charizard being also a Pokeball Pokemon, and every Assist Trophy from previous games that is now playable has AT status too. I want those fanrules dead as a doornail. It would do wonders for speculation. Plus, just have that "one" item disabled if the character shows up. It is programmable to remove certain things, though I don't know how easy it'd be in way later games. To clarify, there is a literal on/off switch in the game's coding even in Smash 64 to make it so only certain Pokemon show up.
...I love that idea. Nice. Though I wonder what other fun inanimate objects could work well..."Introducing the new Homerun Contest! Since Sandbag is playable now, you can simply select any character to K.O. in his place!"
Hey, it could actually be interesting if done right.
Nah, simple makes things way less fun. I like having tons of options for speculation. The more the merrier. Each game got more interesting. Ashley is the AT I want to see playable the most. I'd say Tingle too, but he's not an AT in this game. But still.I think it would just be migraine-inducing. I like that we have a list of characters who we can point to and say they're 99% not making it. Keeps things more simple.
But I also agree that it would be hype if Sakurai decided to break that wall down (but only if he decided to make Waluigi or Skull Kid playable. Most Assist Trophies deserve to be Assist Trophies).
That sounds like a ton of fun, honestly. There's so much you can do when you throw silly fan things out the window. That said, I know it isn't feasible because that's still a crapload of programming. Just taking one AT and making them playable via the Fighter's Pass is way more simple in comparison. Though I'd imagine something like Charizard as a Pokeball isn't nearly as A.I. driven as Little Mac as an AT, so eh.It would be interesting to see Smash veterans as Assist Trophies or Pokeball Pokemon.
Imagine Mario in the same role as Waluigi... or Pikachu in the same role as Meowth.
Donkey Kong as an Assist Trophy would be an 8-bit arcade sprite throwing barrels. He doesn’t do that as a playable character or even as a stage hazard... and it’s the one thing he’s most famous for.
If I could set it to always be Piranha Plant, I'm all for it."Introducing the new Homerun Contest! Since Sandbag is playable now, you can simply select any character to K.O. in his place!"
Hey, it could actually be interesting if done right.
You have no idea how much I want this now."Introducing the new Homerun Contest! Since Sandbag is playable now, you can simply select any character to K.O. in his place!"
Hey, it could actually be interesting if done right.