Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Yeah, I doubt it too but there policy seems inconsistent. They have claimed that they want banjo to be an Xbox exclusive but let him have his own handheld games and he's appeared in all stars games aswell, albeit as an Xbox exclusive. In all honesty, it's doubtful but noone can say for sure.
Everyone in the company that worked on the wonderful games RARE released is gone
No fur. Banjo should never have had fur!
That explains the utter crap we get nowadays then.
I quite disagree, bro. SSB has been #1 as a multiplayer experience for years. What would be different is definatly it's the 1st SSB game that's portable. That's the obvious, but another difference is what Mr. Sakurai said, which was connectivity with the Wii U. What's the connectivity for? I'm not sure, but I see a possible plot with his idea for RPG and moveset remixing with the connection idea.
My thoughts exactly. I had just posted a theory as to what they may do with Smash 4 in the Wii U version thread. Perhaps it may give a bit of insight to theories of where the game will go in terms of direction.
Ugghhhh. If Smash 4 becomes an RPG, it will ruin the competitive community.
Either you've never heard of Dissidia/Dissidia 012: Final Fantasy, or you never gave the games a chance to really see that RPG-based fighters can be competitive.
That's the thing with character builds, a build for - say - Ganondorf, might be a great end all; be all option for most MUs and other characters builds, while some characters may have builds that can specifically and legitimately counter said Ganon build. In games where customization is possible, rarely is a specific build too powerful to be beaten by anything. So I believe this can be a good system to implement, especially if you can create more than one build for a character and switch between builds in between rounds, which will make things even more of a strategic fighter. If Dissidia can do it, and be legitimately competitive, there's no reason why Smash 4 couldn't accomplish this same thing.
Defeats to purpose of what? Being a crossover of Nintendo Fiction?
Well, original characters wouldn't stain Smash Bros., and third parties never stained it themselves. As for my feelings on original characters, I wouldn't mind, if Nintendo knows what they're doing. I mean, Brawl does have - dare I say - Tabuu, and he wasn't all that bad, in my opinion (I personally prefer Master Hand myself, who's also SSB original). So there's no real reason why Nintendo can't have a Smash Bros.-original character in playable form. Whether they actually will put such a character or not makes no lick o' difference to me.
Why would it matter if they used the standard characters?
Tournaments could allow bottom tiers to use certain "customization" bonuses to make them more viable. Just sayin'. (this is from a competitive player, too)
you guys have the option not to buy it you know?
i know right i hate 3ds
Probably never heard of Dissidia. If Dissidia can make a fighting game, with customizable charatcers, and retain a competitive environment, there's no reason why Smash 4 on the 3DS can't do the same.
Its good that you can predict the future
gonna get ready 4 everything u know
what the **** are you talking about? there are plenty of good handheld fighting games. and you say keep smash on the gamecube, but melee sucks? melee is the only smash on the gamecube...
