joeplicate
Smash Master
fod is a great level
joey ur a *****
joey ur a *****
-
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
NCT & 2GG Presents: Nice Shot Hugo RESULTS UP Pools + Bracket
- Thread starter Charoo
- Start date
Shroomed
Smash Master
LooksLikePit
Smash Ace
shroomed I will mm you for $1 in a best of 5 set
Buddha Lova
Smash Apprentice
I'll MM any marth, samus, and fox at this! 2 - 5 dollars.
djmirrorr
Smash Apprentice
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2009
- Messages
- 81
Buddha Lova
Smash Apprentice
Versus my falco I guess, and unless you want to do a 1$ mm vs your sheik I refuse.
joeplicate
Smash Master
buddhist lover
i'll mm you with my fox and marth for 5 dollars each
(less if you want)
i'll mm you with my fox and marth for 5 dollars each
(less if you want)
Buddha Lova
Smash Apprentice
i'll MM your fox for 2 and your marth for whatever you prefer.
(thanks for teaching me how to up smash out of shield to.)
joeplicate
Smash Master
sure
how about 2 and 3 then to round it out
how about 2 and 3 then to round it out
Buddha Lova
Smash Apprentice
Sure that seems good. Do you play marth now?
D
Deleted member
Guest
people should money match me i'll do falcon, falco, fox
my fox sucks dickkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk but i'll still take any mm that isn't a stupid amount
my fox sucks dickkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk but i'll still take any mm that isn't a stupid amount
LoL simply put, most CP's are ****ing stupid, they offer auto wins to higher tiered characters.
And I'd like to be beaten at this tournament by the players, not by the stages.
This "I play a bad character so I try to benefit my bad character" **** works both ways. ****ty players aren't good enough to beat some players on a neutral, so they cower to a stage that does over half the work for them. How could you even shake someone's hand after winning that way? It's pathetic IMO.
The rule ain't changing at this tournament. it's not even that big a deal. Learn to rely on an improved skillset for this event, then you'll be fine. Simple.
And I'd like to be beaten at this tournament by the players, not by the stages.
This "I play a bad character so I try to benefit my bad character" **** works both ways. ****ty players aren't good enough to beat some players on a neutral, so they cower to a stage that does over half the work for them. How could you even shake someone's hand after winning that way? It's pathetic IMO.
The rule ain't changing at this tournament. it's not even that big a deal. Learn to rely on an improved skillset for this event, then you'll be fine. Simple.
SuperRad
Smash Master
My only real problem with the rule is that you get to ban more than half the stages.
The four counterpicks are banned by the rule, and the midtier player still gets to ban a stage on top of Dave's stupid rule if the higher tiered person wins the first game. That means that the stage list of 9 is whittled down to only three counterpicks available.
The four counterpicks are banned by the rule, and the midtier player still gets to ban a stage on top of Dave's stupid rule if the higher tiered person wins the first game. That means that the stage list of 9 is whittled down to only three counterpicks available.
TheLifeRuiner
Smash Lord
i have no problem with this rule
Yeah I know, that's tight.
The high tier can always ban a CP stage, then there'd be 4 neutrals available.
pockyD
Smash Legend
just eliminate cp stages for all characters then
SuperRad
Smash Master
My point is that situations like this can happen:
Sheik vs Doc
Game 1 is on Battlefield, Sheik wins
Game 2 is on Dreamland, Doc wins
Doc bans FoD
now the Sheik player has only three stages available:
Dreamland, Yoshi's and FD available.
If a person isn't allowed to counterpick to a stage they banned, then that list would probably [at least for me] be shrunk to two stages I'd be available to counterpick.
Sheik vs Doc
Game 1 is on Battlefield, Sheik wins
Game 2 is on Dreamland, Doc wins
Doc bans FoD
now the Sheik player has only three stages available:
Dreamland, Yoshi's and FD available.
If a person isn't allowed to counterpick to a stage they banned, then that list would probably [at least for me] be shrunk to two stages I'd be available to counterpick.
Yeah that's fine. They're both neutrals. So pick a neutral you'd do best on. I don't see the problem, unless you really hate both the neutrals you're left with. But that sucks right? Like...when you're left to choose between stages you hate and can't really win on. I mean idk, i'm just guessing.
LoL this is silly. I've never heard so much arguing over a stupid rule before, mainly cuz it explicitly discriminates against high tiers.
But i'm sure there'd be worse upheaval if I discriminated against lower tiers.
pockyD
Smash Legend
trahhSTEEZY
Smash Champion
Pleeeease don't take out the rule. Seriously, I don't even play mid-tier. But Toptier/hightier complaining about this is too good. So don't change it, and if people are gonna not show up because they can't take a character a tier or two lower than them to a stage that isn't already NEUTRAL, then I can laugh.
@____@
@____@
Shroomed
Smash Master
i am in full support of HugS stupid rule
i'll jus not CP any gay stages either
i'll do neutrals only no bans in all tourney sets
i'll jus not CP any gay stages either
i'll do neutrals only no bans in all tourney sets
SuperRad
Smash Master
I think neutrals only is how it should be. I don't really get the point of the rule as it stands. If you think the stages are unfair, then have them banned completely. If you just want to protect your own ***, I get that.
I also don't get what's stopping someone from switching characters or other such shenanigans.
I also don't get what's stopping someone from switching characters or other such shenanigans.
trahhSTEEZY
Smash Champion
I think the point of the rule being NOT neutrals only is that Hugs plays a mid-tier character, so it'd only make sense the rule works out that way. Hence how he said earlier each person that's made their own rule benefited them/their character.(mangos/charoos)
Why not? Lol, I'm sure if you had a tournament dedicated to you you'd want some cool rule benefiting you too.
Why not? Lol, I'm sure if you had a tournament dedicated to you you'd want some cool rule benefiting you too.
TheLifeRuiner
Smash Lord
as i understand it, it's:
top/highs can be gay with each other
mid/lower can also be gay with themselves and above, except they can choose hsr and have things not be gay
whereas neutrals only would affect everyone, and no one could be gay
top/highs can be gay with each other
mid/lower can also be gay with themselves and above, except they can choose hsr and have things not be gay
whereas neutrals only would affect everyone, and no one could be gay
Shroomed
Smash Master
i dont think anyone should be gay this tournament
PROP 8!!! lmao jk
PROP 8!!! lmao jk
SuperRad
Smash Master
I get what the rule does, I just don't understand the motivation other than as something completely self serving [which I also understand, but whatever].
I don't know what rule Champ made up, but Mango's was applied equally to everyone. This rule rewards people who play ****ty characters and to a fairly extreme degree compared to Mango's rule [which, at the time, wasn't even that big of a deal because most people playing against Jiggs/Peach would've banned Brinstar or Mute City as both were legal at Mango Juice].
TheLifeRuiner
Smash Lord
i think it depends on how you see it
i understand what you mean, but if you look at it as a neutrals only tournament where the stupid rule is that tops/and highs can use gay CPs against each other, then it looks like it "benefits" tops/highs (the only difference being that with hugo's ruleset, neutrals only is dependent on whether hsr is activated or not)
it only seems self-serving given previous rulesets is what i'm trying to say
i think
edit:
i thought about it again and i understand what you're saying like this:
tournament
half the characters have limited stages you pick against them because they're not as good
but you can pick all stages against the ones that are good
and even using my example it's:
neutrals only
the half that's good characters can choose all stages, however neutrals only against the not as good characters because of just that
in either case, i just think "who cares anyways"
i understand what you mean, but if you look at it as a neutrals only tournament where the stupid rule is that tops/and highs can use gay CPs against each other, then it looks like it "benefits" tops/highs (the only difference being that with hugo's ruleset, neutrals only is dependent on whether hsr is activated or not)
it only seems self-serving given previous rulesets is what i'm trying to say
i think
edit:
i thought about it again and i understand what you're saying like this:
tournament
half the characters have limited stages you pick against them because they're not as good
but you can pick all stages against the ones that are good
and even using my example it's:
neutrals only
the half that's good characters can choose all stages, however neutrals only against the not as good characters because of just that
in either case, i just think "who cares anyways"
brian
MacD
Banned via Administration
so wait
even with hugs stuipd rule, am i going to have to ban stadium again mid tiers because they might pick it against me even though i can't pick it against them?
even with hugs stuipd rule, am i going to have to ban stadium again mid tiers because they might pick it against me even though i can't pick it against them?
The Greater Leon
Smash Hero
mid tiers suck ****
let them even the playing field for this one tournament
if you disagree with the principle of the idea it doesnt go much further than C tier being no better than C tier
let them even the playing field for this one tournament
if you disagree with the principle of the idea it doesnt go much further than C tier being no better than C tier
trahhSTEEZY
Smash Champion
since youre banning it chances are you wouldn't pick it anyways. so ban it if its a problem, just like usual, i would think.
TheLifeRuiner
Smash Lord
heh
well at least i can't do that again since i'm never CPing anything other than neutrals ever again!
Absolutely, if they activate hsr that is.
And Brian, mangos stupid rule made it so that u couldn't ban dreamland, benefitting Samus peach, and jiggs
Champs made it so that u couldn't ban green greens, benefitting fox/falco and screwing any characters that could die quickly off the top.
forward
Smash Champion
Can you take IC to cp stages?
joeplicate
Smash Master
if this means i can't take doc/samus to stadium
that's ****en gay
that's ****en gay
Lovage
Smash Hero
my only problem with the rule is that hugo keeps using mango juice as an example of a "stupid rule" being totally fine
when at mango juice, not only was that rule not enforced at all, no one even remembered it existed, and ppl banned dreamland all day
when at mango juice, not only was that rule not enforced at all, no one even remembered it existed, and ppl banned dreamland all day
ssbbFICTION
Smash Champion
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2008
- Messages
- 2,535
I need a decent teammate. I'm getting pretty okay i promise! haha.
I need a ride to this can anyone take me? :D:D:D:D i rly wanna go!
hugo your rule is gay
I need a ride to this can anyone take me? :D:D:D:D i rly wanna go!
hugo your rule is gay
ROMBO69
Smash Cadet
LoL go ahead and bypass it all day if you want. It's only in effect when the player wishes to enforce it. It's the same ****. I didn't let anyone ban Dreamland at mango juice I believe. the rule is there for those who wish to use it. The player still must ask for HSR to be in effect. Same ****.
-Hugo