FrozenFlame, I'm sure you know, Occam's Razor states that the simplest solution is often the best/right solution. Your post fails to take into account so many variables, it's not even credible. Tery died last night by an SK's hand.
Bull**** Detected
Tery was a threat to no man. The only people that couldn't talk him down in Lylo are Joey and Red Ruy. SK is much better served shooting players who can threaten him and leaving more worthless players for engame (such as tery). Mafia shot J, no miss about it. The only one shooting Tery is a bad vig weeding inactives but even then it makes more sense to remove purple or bean****. The only other feasible way for Tery to have died was a mistarget.
You accuse me of going against Occam's Razor but I'm not. I AM following Occam's Razor. I just happen to have more information that you on the subject and since I KNOW that Tery couldn't have died as a result of targeting me, the most simple solution is that somebody killed him. And since I know somebody killed him, since I have to guess between scum, vig, and indy, based on how I'd predict these three parties to behave (given they all exist in the game), my best guess is that an indy killed Tery.
Just because
you think that an indy killer should play in "X" way and be eliminating people they take to be endgame threats from the get go,
doesn't mean that every indy killer ever will play that way. YOU are the one failing to take other variables into consideration, whereas I have missed none, thought I'd love to hear you substantiate your claim that apparently I'm missing so many of them, yet you list absolutely none.
Killing people with very few or weak connections and few posts is a perfectly reasonable and predictable strategy in the early game for an indy killer, since they want to typically draw as little attention to themselves as possible. The fact that you are completely overlooking this and just assuming YOUR TAKE on what an indy killer should do is the ONLY ANSWER completely destroys your claim that you're following Occum's Razor. You aren't following it, you're just ignoring other simple, clean, and reasonable solutions to the problem at hand and IGNORING THEM COMPLETELY.
Let's examine Tery's role as a mason recruiter at the moment. The two highest profile recruits are you and I. If any disagrees, say something now. I am not in a masonry. And we have someone in the masonry claiming he targeting you. You questioned how Gorf knew Tery targeted you; why in the world would a recruiter not tell his buddy who he targets if he could potentially mistarget and die?
You're
completely missing the point.
If Tery and gord really were masoned, and that's a BIG if, obviously Tery would tell Gord who he planned to target at night to recruit.
That DOES NOT IN ANY WAY SHAPE OR FORM CONFIRM FOR GORD AS AN ALLEGED MASON PARTNER HOW EXACTLY TERY DIED.
Gord would know that Tery targeted me. He would also know that Tery didn't live through the night. Where in that equation does Gord magically come into contact with information describing specifically why Tery didn't live? That's the whole ****ing point. He WOULDN'T KNOW, so he's
making it up. Whether that's because he's just jumping to conclusions based on his limited info as an actual townie or just BSing the whole deal is the question here.
Now it's time for us to question your information. You claimed patriot, which is anti-cult specifically. I doubt anyone here can name a game where Patriot was used as a check to a mason recruiter. Likewise, I doubt a Patriot would be informed that they were recruited or attempted to be recruited the night before, which you have claimed to have known despite Gorf's claim. Occam's Razor calls bull****.
Patriot is anti-cult specifically? Really?
Please direct me to your source for that statement.
And while you at it, please link me to a game on SWF where a patriot was used as an anti-cult mechanism specifically.
Last time I checked, Patriot is a role that is simply
anti-recruiting. That means, mason recruiters, cults, mentors, Yakuzass you name it.
Again, you aren't using Occam's Razor. You're blatantly disregarding equally plausible scenarios and explanations based on your own completely fallacious assumptions. The fact that you can even
name specifically the likely mechanic that the patriot is serving in this game and then go ahead and just disregard it because you've never seen it before exemplifies this. YOU EVEN SAID BEFORE THAT IF GORDS ROLE IS LEGIT THEN IT IS OP! Don't you think it makes sense for a role like, oh idk, PATRIOT to exist in a game where a mason recruiter starts off with an advantage in order to like, oh, idk,
balance things out?
Like seriously, you need to sit down and look at what facts you
actually have and what are
actually plausible scenarios. You're ignoring so much for no good reason and it's kind of pathetic.
If there is no vig left to claim, then I am absolutely right that you're the reason that he died. Mason recruiters don't just spontaneously die.
No, you aren't.
Yeah they don't just spontaneously die. Thanks genius. But obviously the ONLY TWO WAYS a mason recruiter can die are if a vig kills them or they misrecruit right? Like there's absolutely NO WAY that an indy killer or mafia could kill a mason recruiter ever. Like mason recruiters are bullet proof to those abilities, right?
Do I sound ****ing ******** yet? Because that's what YOU sound like.
I told Tery that, RIGHT when he got the results of his recruitment, to quote-unquote tell me what was said in his role PM. He said that he failed to recruit you.
wtfamireading.jpg
Tery failed to recruit me pre-game? Because you said you got that info in his role PM.
Actually ya know what, since you can't express yourself for ****, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt.
So what you're saying is you asked Tery what the results of his N1 action were. You're saying that Tery
got a response from X1 before the night was over and before he died (because if he told you after he got the notice saying he died, that'd be cheating. Assuming you guys were actually masoned which I still highly doubt) saying that his recruitment failed. And then he told you this in private.
So you guys think that it's perfectly normal for someone to get confirmation of what happened with their night action before
all night actions are resolved and day phase begins, which would allow people who died in the night to talk to people if they had the opportunity to, which would allow people who shouldn't have ever received the info they had because they'd be
dead, to spread that information, BUT it ISN'T OK for me to receive notification at the start of the day from X1 that I was targeted for recruitment and that it failed.
Impressive double standard you have there.
But even beyond the fact that what you're claiming to know doesn't make any sense,
you're still exaggerating what you allegedly know.
You're claiming to know that Tery targeted me AND that him targeting me was the
reason for his death.
Did you get a message from X1 saying that? Did he PM you saying "Yo gord, Tery targeted FF but FF was scum so he died"?
No, he ****ing didn't. And unless you DID get that message, you don't ****ing KNOW ****. You're lying, whether you're town OR scum.
Here are our two scenarios:
Town Gord:
Tery said he was gonna target me, and told Gord this. Tery didn't make it through the night. MAYBE Tery was actually able to tell Gord that his recruitment failed (which is would if he targeted me, since I'm a patriot). Day 2 starts and Tery is dead.
Gord fallaciously concludes that dead Tery MUST mean Frozenscum when in reality it ACTUALLY means Patriot frozen in conjunction with a killer killing Tery the same night. Gord has absolutely NO WAY OF KNOWING the exact reason why Tery died, yet he is claiming to. He's a lying townie in this case.
Scum Gord:
Gord may or may not have killed Tery at night. Gord sees Tery flip Crew Leader. Gord figures out that this probably means he is a Mason Leader. Mason Leader's usually start alone, and since there has only been one night, there is no way anyone could have been recruited into the masonry with Tery in order to confirm or deny whether or not Tery got a successful recruit or failed to recruit, the previous night (since Killing comes before Recruiting via NAR). Knowing that pretending to be Tery's starting mason partner cannot be CC'd or verified in any way, Gord claims it, and then just bull****s that I was Tery's target and the reason he died, even though he actually has no idea Tery targeted me (unless he also has some tracking or watching ability). He happens to be right that Tery targeted me (not hard to predict, since Tery had me as a strong town read D1). Because he's scum and really doesn't have ANY information, he doesn't know what info he would actually likely have in his faked position and overstretches what he would ACTUALLY theoretically know, thus saying stupid **** like OMG FROZEN IS WHY TERY DIED DERP DERP.
In BOTH scenarios Gord is lying. I have not. Gord has inconsistencies in his claim. I do not. Anyone seeing a trend here?
What information could you have possibly gathered from answers? I'd say that the standard answer from those that couldn't differentiate a Crew Leader from a Mason Recruiter would be that he got NK'd.
Yeah that is the standard answer. I'm not
looking for the standard answer. Are you that dense? Obviously I was watching to see if anyone argued with conviction either for possibility that Tery was killed or for the possibility that he did a misrecruit (as I said to AM, "****ed up")
Nah, you didn't actually. You can keep pretending to know these things though. Only makes it easier for me to figure out if you're really town or not. I explained how you have no way of knowing this above.
The same way that a patriot with notification of recruit attempt, WITH THE SPECIFIC NAME OF SAID RECRUITER, seems overpowered to me.
Thanks for putting words in my mouth. I was told that I was
targeted for recruitment. I didn't get Tery's name, but based on his D1 play AND his flip it's pretty obvious it was him who did it.
And how is that overpowered exactly? I'd love to hear you argue that my role is as overpowered as your alleged role.
You seem veeeeery dead set on letting people know that Tery did, in fact, target you.
Because he did and I have no reason to lie. Do you have a problem with that?
What I am is a townie who's mason recruiter died after failing to recruit you, and try'na rid of a potentially VERY dangerous scum bag.
No, that's what you're pretending to be and we have no way of verifying it other than lynching you. Furthermore, you've been proven to be lying about what you actually allegedly know. And I'm the one who's dangerous? Go figure.
The only justification upon his posts is that he had nothing but pro town things to say about me. I told him specifically to make a town-town connection with me. I know that that isn't a whole lot, but it is what it is.
Yep, it is what it is. Lofty, weak, useless ****. This is why your claim is sloppy as ****.
Hmm... There's possible reasoning for me being scum?
Why would I jump on you IMMEDIATELY at the beginning of the game, especially after the only suspicion I had of you all of yesterDay was the mechanics, which I made null due to the fact that you had asked questions? And the only time I made contact with you was to say that you making the HURR DURR comments made me
. Isn't it curious that I had such a change of heart after coming into toDay?
Wait, how is going from "attacking FF on Day 1" to "attacking FF on Day 2" a change of heart?
Do you even know what that means?
And sorry, it isn't my burden of proof to explain
for you why
you would decide to make such a ****ty claim and try to get me lynched, whether your are town or scum.
How could I have known that Tery targeted you, WHICH YOU CONFIRM, if I wasn't mason'd with em?
/facepalm
I've explained this in my two scenarios above, but the point is you DIDN'T HAVE TO KNOW TERY ACTUALLY TARGETED ME LAST NIGHT TO MAKE THIS CLAIM OF YOURS.
If you are actually his starting mason partner, then yeah, you
would know. I've explained this.
But if you were scum you could STILL MAKE THE CLAIM. Mason recruiters don't typically start with partners. I've never seen that before and I'm sure no one else in this game has either. As scum and knowing this, and knowing that Tery was a mason recruiter based on his flip, you would KNOW that he could not have possible recruited anybody into his masonry successfully because he either A.) Misrecruited or B.) Was NK'd, which comes BEFORE RECRUITMENT in NAR.
With this knowledge you can safely claim to be his partner, since it would be completely unverifiable since no one else could possibly have entered into a masonry with Tery. It's really not that hard to understand.
Why didn't you respond to this yesterday at 6:01?
Why didn't you respond to me at 12:01 last night?
(lolzy but true) Does it seem logical that I'D attack YOU unless I was confident about it?
No it doesn't, but if you are town you obviously didn't think clearly about all the info you
really had and thus were confident for the wrong reasons, or you are scum and were confident about this gambit OR someone else is pulling the strings and told you to do it who WAS confident.