Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Do people just not read the graph instructions at ALL? Let alone the countless times they've been repeated...?I think a few of your match ups don't match. You have 60-40 MK vs ROB in the MK row and 30-70 in the ROB row.
Tell people that when they discuss the matchups then. The jigglypuff boards asked for the bowser boards to come in and voice their opinion, and only Gheb and MrEh actually contributed anything, so they came to 55/45 after MrEhs (and to a lesser extent Ghebs, he left before the discussion was finished) contributions.Ike, Lucas and Jigglypuff are too cute, they think they have a slight advantage.
i lied, i just realized that the pt people have the MOST matchups discussed. technically.hahah i'm proud to be in charge of the matchup discussion with the second least amount of matchups analyzed.
Let's check his clearly listed sources.I'm confused, the Pit boards say that it's 50-50 and the R.O.B. boards are currently discussing Pit and seem to be saying that it's also 50-50.
Why in your R.O.B. matchup does it say it's 60-40 his advantage?
The thing is, you can't convince people they're wrong about a matchup over a forum. Believe me, I've tried and eventually gave up. Oh, you can correct them when they say something that is way off, but if a character board believes it has the advantage, it will cling to that notion for it's dear life. Check the Lucas discussion for example.Tell people that when they discuss the matchups then. The jigglypuff boards asked for the bowser boards to come in and voice their opinion, and only Gheb and MrEh actually contributed anything, so they came to 55/45 after MrEhs (and to a lesser extent Ghebs, he left before the discussion was finished) contributions.
Don't critize other character boards opinions when you don't contribute anything to the contrary.
He changed the link to the new thread, but is probably keeping the old numbers until new ones are FINALIZED.http://www.smashboards.com/showthread.php?t=230591
This thread (The one in your sources) has no match-up imformation on Pit, it says absolutely nothing about it being a 60-40 advantage to R.O.B. where are you getting your imformation? shouldn't it be in the sources?
http://www.smashboards.com/showthread.php?t=233143
This thread here has the R.O.B. boards discussing Pit. They clearly agree it is 50-50.
Sorry if I'm still doing something wrong but I don't know where you got your imformation if it isn't in your clearly labelled sources.
Could you someone please explain?
You're wrong. The Yoshi boards were convinced that Yoshi went even with Meta Knight until they were set straight about the matchup. Most believe it's 40:60, now.The thing is, you can't convince people they're wrong about a matchup over a forum. Believe me, I've tried and eventually gave up. Oh, you can correct them when they say something that is way off, but if a character board believes it has the advantage, it will cling to that notion for it's dear life. Check the Lucas discussion for example.
Blatant strawman.What's happening here is that people who have NEVER played an even average Bowser are going "Yeah he's fat we counter him", and instead of being skeptic about it, the WHOLE BOARD agrees.
Yeah... no.I'm not saying Bowser is good, I'm saying 5 or 6 communities on this board really should not be bringing up numbers when it's clear they have no experience whatsoever.
That would be because Yoshis' actually played Meta Knights.You're wrong. The Yoshi boards were convinced that Yoshi went even with Meta Knight until they were set straight about the matchup. Most believe it's 40:60, now.
Nope, that's actually what happened. Check the ZSS discussion if you don't beleive me. I gain nothing by strawmanning.Blatant strawman.
Which one? None of the ZSS matchup threads have a summary (except for one that's from April of last year), and the Bowser board doesn't cite any discussion or have a summary on theirs.Nope, that's actually what happened. Check the ZSS discussion if you don't beleive me. I gain nothing by strawmanning.
Yeah that does happen a lot, but it's not (or wasn't when I frequented the Jigs boards) a huge problem there. The zelda boards convinced us that it was worse than we thought as an example. You are totally right in general though, people usually label low teirs "LOL JIggs is liek zo lite, she just diez" Or "boozer iz zo slow and fat!". But unless a god lowteir mainer plays them , they won't admit anything.The thing is, you can't convince people they're wrong about a matchup over a forum. Believe me, I've tried and eventually gave up. Oh, you can correct them when they say something that is way off, but if a character board believes it has the advantage, it will cling to that notion for it's dear life. Check the Lucas discussion for example.
What's happening here is that people who have NEVER played an even average Bowser are going "Yeah he's fat we counter him", and instead of being skeptic about it, the WHOLE BOARD agrees. What can I say, character boards are terrible even at theorycrafting.
I'm not saying Bowser is good, I'm saying 5 or 6 communities on this board really should not be bringing up numbers when it's clear they have no experience whatsoever.
"How to read the chart: Each column of each character shows what the other boards say about that character; [top part, reading down] each row shows what a specific character's board says about the rest of the cast. [left part, reading across] For example: If you want to know what Bowser's board says about Ice Climbers, go Bowser's row, [left part] Ice Climbers' column. [top part] It shows a 25. That means Bowser's board says its a 25:75 disadvantage for Bowser. Now, if you want to know what Ice Climbers' Board says about Bowser, go to Ice Climbers' row,Bowser's column. [top] It shows an 80, so Ice Climbers's board says its an 80:20 advantage for Ice Climbers. (As you see, there is a small difference in what each board is saying)"
Please people, it's not as complicated as you think it is. T_T
Sure it is.It is a match-up chart, but with two different perspectives instead of just one.
Ike has a 0-60 on you. And you're like THE easiest character to catch in jabs. You're at least as slow as Ike is. You're possibly one of Ike's best match-ups. GTFO and read the boards.Wow at:
Diddy Kong VS Bowser
Zamus VS Bowser
Luigi VS Bowser
Get a clue respective boards.
Ike, Lucas and Jigglypuff are too cute, they think they have a slight advantage.
Yeah, that sounded like a contradiction without a refutation.Sure it is.
Bowser has a chaingrab on Ike that can finish with a FTilt and that works at any %. WHOOPS? And lol at bold. Whatever, I'm certianly not going to discuss the matchup with someone like you.Ike has a 0-60 on you. And you're like THE easiest character to catch in jabs. You're at least as slow as Ike is. You're possibly one of Ike's best match-ups. GTFO and read the boards.
Really?! Woah! Let's actually do some research instead of just hanging our mouths open and letting the stupid dribble out like the special kid at the back of the class.Ike has a 0-60 on you. And you're like THE easiest character to catch in jabs. You're at least as slow as Ike is. You're possibly one of Ike's best match-ups. GTFO and read the boards.
Character | Jab |Dash A|DTilt|FTilt|UTilt| DSma| FSma| USma| NAir| DAir| FAir| UAir| BAir| NSpe| DSpe| FSpe| USpe
Bowser | 6 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 8 | 14 | 26 | 16 | 8 | 14 | 8 | 16 | 9 | 23 | 11 | 8 | 6
Ike | 3 | 18 | 16 | 17 | 13 | 13 | 29 | 25 | 15 | 16 | 18 | 15 | 7 | 30 | | 19 |
Yes yes, the chaingrab.Ike has a 0-60 on you.
Read Flayl's post. UpB makes it only an up to 42% grab. And if Bowser's already there, it don't work.Yes yes, the chaingrab.
I've never seen this done in an actual match btw, so why don't you start? ^^
Mainly because going back and forth about it would be a waste of time. At least this way I get my point across without mundane debate over semantics.Yeah, that sounded like a contradiction without a refutation.
What semantics? It's obviously a match up chart. >.>Mainly because going back and forth about it would be a waste of time. At least this way I get my point across without mundane debate over semantics.
It's not the fact that ICs can infinite Ganon that gives them 100-0 on him. Strictly speaking, they can 0-death virtually everyone. The difference is that there is no realistic way for Ganon to NOT be infinited or otherwise totally destroyed. He can't space them, because he has to be up close. He doesn't have a viable approach, and he's pretty much at an impossible disadvantage in every conceivable scenario.If ICs v. Ganon is a 0-100 matchup, shouldn't the DDD v. DK missing matchup also be a 0-100? Same for all the other standing infinite characters.
I guess he's 5-95 on Sheik. My guess, I suppose, is the lack of an infinite. Not that it matters much.What about shiek vs ganon? Shiek brings out the chain, nothing ganon can do either.