Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I would not call it a 'case', but there's this which I have not seen a satisfactory answer to.
not yet but maybe soon, there's a couple of other things i wanna find out, gotta get some bases covered. that's the whole point of startin' our own this group
Because every game this happens where someone (almost always you if you're in the game) perceives my meta/ playstyle as scum. The accusations/ leads/ w/e attempts I do to express my reads, important things people have said, help town, ect. always get ignored or perceived as well, scum intent every single game. So you know, you basically give me what appears to be a post game talk/ piece of advice and i'm looking at that and thinking to myself: "He may be right, my play is normally **** anyway, I should try listening to Soup"
Welp, time to go into a wall explaining every little facet of my mindset when making 752 possible (although I know it's not gonna change your mind anyway because I know when i'm gonna be lynched.)
Asking Rake to give an answer to where Rake presented a binary between styles of Marshy and how to read them. I don't see how the question is scum-hunting though since it's kind of implied by Rake that he doesn't have an answer to whether Marshy is scum or not, hence the wording of Rake's statement that Nabe question.
Any player can ask "Do *blank* have a read on *blank* at the moment?" Doesn't show reading in depth, doesn't show thought, it's such a basic question. Nabe could ask the same question to ANYONE and it wouldn't be different. In other words, a question for the sake of a question.
Asking Scary for his opinion on between the back and forth on FT and Marshy. Why does Nabe have to ask someone else their take? Why doesn't Nabe have any input of his own? How can this be considered thoughtful at all? I can't see any thought in this. I don't see any direction, once again it looks like a question for the sake of a question. It's the mafia equivalent of asking what someone thinks about the weather. We all know it's a BS question.
Nabe is not asking either of the two slots Kary mentioned questions. Why is it relevant that Nabe hears back from those two slots before answering? So he gets a chance to parrot what they say? Maybe he's just stalling for time? I don't know why Nabe needs an answer but the relevance is not there based on his posts up to that point and it comes off as a way to avoid making an opinion.
The claim here that I disagreed with was simple. Thuggin believes that aggromed had a certain type of play this game where he cared about the game during pregame UNTIL a wagon appeared. The claim goes on to imply that aggromed STOPPED caring about pregame once a wagon started forming on them.
Yep, I had reasons earlier on to vote We Thuggin, any more questions? I'm prepared to write like 50000 walls now. Watch, you're next going to ask me to write a wall where I have to quote everything on We Thuggin up to that point and go post by post explaining the significance of each quote.
getting to this eventually, remind me im app trouble shooting.
textbook rake scum doesnt do this
No, but textbook Rake scum points out what textbook Rake scum wouldn't do.
I didn't like this for the same exact reason I didn't like Gorf's vote, so look at my explanation regarding Gorf to understand not liking Nabe's vote.
I think this speaks for itself, btw Rake, would still love these if you didn't see this before.
The "beam of logic" I was referring to was basically all that stuff where FT was talking about how stupid it was to quicklynch, especially 24 hours into the game. (Let me guess Soup, i'm going to need to find quotes to further satisfy you, aren't I?) Shoot me for this, but I find myself feeling comfortable with slots that I agree with, and I agreed with the stuff FT was saying about how bad the quick lynch was.
Soup, want quote by quote with this or is the explanation that I wanted to express myself town lean reading him because the idea is to be more open about what's going on in my head enough for you?
Underlined part is what I find relevant because reading up to page 12 is enough to be contributing, he at least implied he's been keeping up to well, page 12. What bothers me then is that he really hasn't been posting, in fact I can't remember if he had done anything up to this point in the game (or if he has done anything yet) >_>
The contradictory part is actually something I forgot to get rid of and didn't notice during my post. Basically the contradiction I noticed in my first read was the bolded parts where Raziek claimed to have seen the lynch then he basically said: "oops, didn't see flip.", I first read that as lynch = flip, or that both words mean the same thing. However when I did my second read of everything during the quicklynch period, I realized that the mod terms "lynch" and "flip" were different, the flip was collapsed, and the posts for lynch and flip were different, so Raziek's 649 was referring to #645, where as Raziek's 650 was referring to #647. Like I said, something I forgot to get rid of from my notes so I have to clarify here.
what interaction this is bull u scum brah ?
untrue i do it all the time as town too. see scott pilgrim mafia
Regardless, point is moot. You do it as either alignment so I don't see why it becomes a valid point.
been busy what is up and where
Brother, I'm not at my computer right now but I'm TOTALLY interested in what you're thinking about with that bulky DDos man
so why mention it
I don't like Thuggin's slot, so it should be pretty obvious why I don't like him trying to direct PRs.
Must I delve into the 671 case line by line Soup, must I? *Grumble grumble* Walls *Grumble Grumble* Outside of that I well, agreed with the specific part of case about FT not looking like they are scum hunting because well, I don't remember any of their posts looking at the other slots sticking out to me or well, being insightful, helpful, ect. Outside of some posts pushing We Thuggin
I've touched upon We Thuggin avoiding justifying his Scary read enough times. Still going to note that I think it's
Rake, go go go?
Your doing the stuff I quick shot soup for. You are defending yourself with meta tells then trying to hide behind it.
What about recent Dabuz posts?
What about em? They're walls that I (Ryker) have legitimately not read yet. I didn't want to wade through them after spending two hours on the phone and a few more after that on Skype talking about Mafia. I'm working on a larger view of Dabuz and I'll catch them then.
I'm deferring to Rajam's read but he still is thinks Dabuz is a town lean because his intent seems at the very least interested in hunting.
This us why he got an early tuen read and from what new content he has seen he's still thinking this hold true as a town read.
!
Probably better for both of us if I don't go role fishing. I don't REALLY need to know if the possibility I thought of is true or not. No, I don't have enough information to be certain I'm right, but I also don't entirely need to know. I'd rather remain unsure enough I can't act on it than to make it publicly known if I'm right.So Ryker, I got from your posts that, like, you don't wanna have a sesh with me man? I brought my good bong man we were gonna have some killer bonding time man
fa sho
Alright man, just hit me up if you ever need some walrus man
