• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

Let's discuss Rainbow Cruise(We're done with Brinstar, I guess)!

Life

Smash Hero
Joined
Jul 19, 2010
Messages
5,264
Location
Grieving No Longer
If we allow endless planking with MK banned, people will plank for a couple weeks, then get dair-spiked for a couple weeks, and then problem solved.
 

Cassio

Smash Master
Joined
Jul 1, 2011
Messages
3,185
I guess Im confused on what the purpose of this thread is. Is it to discuss its inclusion ideologically or pragmatically? Ideologically Brinstar easily passes most objective measurements in regards to competition because it doesnt reduce the game to broken tactics or come all that close even with MK. And Id be surprised if there wasnt a thread before this already making a strong case for this more or less.

The problem is stagelists are not created using objective measurements or ideology, theyre created comparitively and based on the amount of stage interaction players are willing to put up with, and with this sort of assesment Brinstar and RC fall well beyond the line. Im not saying thats the way it should be done, its just the way it is. Brinstar and RC aside there are several other stages that are banned in spite of their competitive value so trying to convince the community with these sorts of arguments wont cause any headway when its apparent thats not what people care about. Convincing people of Brinstar and RC's merits requires that you convince them to care about those kinds of merits in the first place, and almost certainly will need to coincide with their acceptance of several other stages they strongly dislike.
 

Akaku94

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Jan 27, 2010
Messages
483
Location
Washington, DC
^well put, Cassio^

We're trying to argue ideaology and the stages all at once, but we keep getting the response "zomg no gay stages that make you do stuff, FD da bess, ban all that cheap stuff to nerf MK!!!11!1one!1!!"
 

-LzR-

Smash Hero
Joined
Jan 1, 2009
Messages
7,649
Location
Finland
I liked it when people never striked SV when I used to main MK, scrooging tw.
It's awesome how the claimed most neutral stage in the game has a borderline broken tactic in it.
 

Akaku94

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Jan 27, 2010
Messages
483
Location
Washington, DC
^so now that MK is gone, G&W will pick there more often, correct? If so, I'm looking forward to seeing it; he's not broken there, just good on more stages in general.
 

DMG

Smash Legend
Joined
Feb 12, 2006
Messages
18,959
Location
Waco
Slippi.gg
DMG#931
Without a LGL, no you don't want to fight G&W there would be a waste of time for 80% of the cast.
 

DMG

Smash Legend
Joined
Feb 12, 2006
Messages
18,959
Location
Waco
Slippi.gg
DMG#931
Well a lot of people are arguing for a LGL to be taken off, or are talking about stages with LGL out of the picture. There are certain stages that can change from banned to CP depending on how strict you are with ledge usage. Norfair is a good example. Norfair is an incredibly awful stage IF you have no LGL. Norfair is much more reasonable if you have a LGL on. Norfair is at least borderline either way, but yeah.

Brinstar without a LGL I would say no to. Same with Norfair Japes Brinstar Pipes Distant Planet or other stages with clustered ledges. Ledge clusters are a big no no gameplay wise if you're not gonna limit ledge play because they do become too centralizing.
 

Tesh

Smash Hero
Joined
Oct 28, 2008
Messages
9,737
Location
TX
Norfair is still bad with an LGL. Characters like Sonic, Wario and Pit don't need to grab the ledge more than maybe once every 30 seconds IF that.

LGL is here to stay. The vast majority of us don't want what the game can come down to without LGLs.
 

DMG

Smash Legend
Joined
Feb 12, 2006
Messages
18,959
Location
Waco
Slippi.gg
DMG#931
And there are people arguing for a bigger stage list AND LGL to be taken off, and it's just not reasonable for certain stages. That was my point.
 

Tesh

Smash Hero
Joined
Oct 28, 2008
Messages
9,737
Location
TX
No LGL isn't reasonable for any stage. Those people are dumb and only care about ideology.
 

BSP

Smash Legend
Joined
May 23, 2009
Messages
10,246
Location
Louisiana
We could keep going back and forth while end the end, people just go with whatever their local scene says or whatever floats their boat.
 

Akaku94

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Jan 27, 2010
Messages
483
Location
Washington, DC
mk 2 good, cheap stage that's also gay and makes you move which is bad. It doesn't tell you who the best player is, only who can abuse the stage better. If we play with RC legal we might as well turn on items. Only Nazis would play with it on. FD da bess.

Ok, did I cover everything?
 

Akaku94

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Jan 27, 2010
Messages
483
Location
Washington, DC
Oh well :p

But seriously, there's nothing really wrong with the stage: it's completely non-random, and there are no overcentralizing tactics. The only thing going against it is that it moves, which gives the false impression that it's "cheap" or the like.
 

Player-1

Smash Legend
Joined
Apr 27, 2008
Messages
12,186
Location
Rainbow Cruise
The only negative aspect of RC is the fact that it's polarizing, and not even by that much if people actually know the stage. Seriously, Falco is pretty awesome on this stage, especially the boat. If the boat was a stage by itself then it'd probably be his best stage or close to it.
 
Joined
Mar 15, 2008
Messages
10,050
He gets an infinite off the boat portion too. :p

I think that M2K has shown us that it's easy to get past the 8 minute mark in RC, but his opponents have shown us that it's a lot more difficult than it looks to snag a win (M2K vs. Bizkit comes to mind).
 

SaveMeJebus

Smash Master
Joined
Apr 29, 2010
Messages
4,371
He gets an infinite off the boat portion too. :p

I think that M2K has shown us that it's easy to get past the 8 minute mark in RC, but his opponents have shown us that it's a lot more difficult than it looks to snag a win (M2K vs. Bizkit comes to mind).
M2K still won, though
 

SaveMeJebus

Smash Master
Joined
Apr 29, 2010
Messages
4,371
Well, it doesn't really matter how difficult he makes it for him to get the win. The win is all that matters
 
Joined
Mar 15, 2008
Messages
10,050
But we've seen countless matches of others getting a little bit too close for comfort.
 

Player-1

Smash Legend
Joined
Apr 27, 2008
Messages
12,186
Location
Rainbow Cruise
Vinnie has beaten him somewhat recently I've heard.


M2K is like...the best player in the country using the best character on his best stage...of course he's not going to be dropping THAT many games.
 

SaveMeJebus

Smash Master
Joined
Apr 29, 2010
Messages
4,371
But that's what we base everything off of (that and theorycraft)

ALso, didn't hear anything about that and if he did, it was probably with either G&W or Wario.
 

SaveMeJebus

Smash Master
Joined
Apr 29, 2010
Messages
4,371
We base it off of top level play.

It does matter what character he used. If you have to main a character that does well on RC to win on RC, then it it's no different from having to main a character with projectiles on a walk off stage.
 

Player-1

Smash Legend
Joined
Apr 27, 2008
Messages
12,186
Location
Rainbow Cruise
According to top level play, ICs and Olimar should be in the number 2 or 3 spot on the tier list, D3 should be abysmally lower, Jiggz, CF, Mario, Samus, PT, and more characters should all be below ganon on the tier list.

I don't see where you're getting at with what characters are used....?
 
Top Bottom