Beat!
Smash Master
._______________.if at any point KK did say Pichu beats Fox, he was being legit considering we Have Unknown in our Region, Fox main with probably the best Pichu out there. And he ***** Spacies as Pichu. Just a thought.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
._______________.if at any point KK did say Pichu beats Fox, he was being legit considering we Have Unknown in our Region, Fox main with probably the best Pichu out there. And he ***** Spacies as Pichu. Just a thought.
No. and you cant readFlower doesn't understand that if Marth tries to out-wait Sheik when she's trying to force him to approach via needles, Sheik can take that opportunity to get stage-control (the middle) and press her advantage from there.
.
This. I actually feel more comfortable in that MU because the Combos flow easier imo.I think Marth is Sheik's best matchup out of all the high/top tiers. I know everyone thinks Sheik wrecks Falcon harder, but I disagree. I think Falcon can make that matchup work better than Marth can.
I am not sure I'd say Sheik is bad if cornered. It depends on how you define being cornered though.Sheik is very bad against Marth if he manages to corner her. Her escape options are slow, and he can cover everything if he stays at a certain range. Dtilt is a wonderful control tool. Side-B wrecks all over her aerial approaches (see: bair).
The key I have been finding lately is to push her into those kind of situations as early and often as possible, and never let go. Don't gamble the stage position away with a grab or dash attack; just stay solid and watch her squirm.
Wasn't going to weigh in on this discussion since it seemed to be going nowhere..
but sheik doesn't have any decent options when cornered...much worse than marth in terms of getting out...however, if you consider the likelihood that sheik will only eat one or two hits when cornered as opposed to what marth can do to a spacie if they choose the wrong option from a cornered position (even though the spacies have more options)..then I would actually say marth cornering sheik is not as bad for sheik as it is for spacies, even though marth is more likely to get hits on sheik when she is cornered.
anyone that takes the boards seriously needs a reality check.Personally I think it's better to be a bad poster but a good player, and knowledgeable person then to be a bad poster, bad player and person of little knowledge.
I wasnt referring to marths downb.Side-B wrecks all over her aerial approaches (see: bair).
Sometimes a Sheik is in the air and DIs towards you and does a move. Sometimes that move is bair. In most of those situations, bad Marths do moves that get coldly beaten by bair (fsmash, ftilt, grab, jab, etc) and take that hit to the face. What I am suggesting is that side-b should be used to lengthen Marth's period of control, rather than letting go of an advantageous situation (Sheik in the air).Ahhh yes countering sheiks bair approach.
Lol, I know this is three pages back, but do you realize that you said this to one of the best Sheik mains around? Way to show that you don't know what you're talking about. Keep crying about your extremely good character.Keep reading selectively <___<
And by reading selectively, I basically mean you sound like an idiot.
this is why the marth boards (and the forum in general, coming from someone who has frequented srk for years) has a bad rep. Dont waste your time typing if you wont read something for comprehension, and simply want to read it in order to to say why its "wrong."
I read this.sheik should beat marth like 60/40, give or take a little either way.
if you're playing on FD then marth's DD camping > sheik's inability to approach and he can lame her out pretty easily. with platforms though marth has a very hard time preventing her from gaining stage control because none of his hitboxes stay out and in many cases marth can be punished even if he hits because he hit with a non-tip. sheik should be able to slowly but reliably take over stage control to kill marth 1 stock at a time.
marth has no range advantage on sheik for any practical purpose. like he might have "more" but it's not where you want it to be except dtilt, and if you misplace the tip hit you get grabbed pretty easily. they should both **** each other pretty bad once a positional advantage has been established.
i think amsah is wrong when he says US sheiks rely on grabs too much. US PLAYERS rely on grabs a LOT out of necessity because OOS options and crouch options are stupid good if you don't have some way to negate them. for every character that isn't peach, that means grabbing a lot. sorry amsah but i don't feel like SH FF autocancel fair camping for 5 minutes is going to cut it.
i don't think marth is worse in the newer metagame because he's worse vs sheik, but because he doesn't have fox/falco as "strong" matches anymore.
This sounds accurate. Iirc, wasn't Fox v. Marth at one time considered 60:40 for Marth on a chart?sheik should beat marth like 60/40, give or take a little either way.
if you're playing on FD then marth's DD camping > sheik's inability to approach and he can lame her out pretty easily. with platforms though marth has a very hard time preventing her from gaining stage control because none of his hitboxes stay out and in many cases marth can be punished even if he hits because he hit with a non-tip. sheik should be able to slowly but reliably take over stage control to kill marth 1 stock at a time.
marth has no range advantage on sheik for any practical purpose. like he might have "more" but it's not where you want it to be except dtilt, and if you misplace the tip hit you get grabbed pretty easily. they should both **** each other pretty bad once a positional advantage has been established.
i think amsah is wrong when he says US sheiks rely on grabs too much. US PLAYERS rely on grabs a LOT out of necessity because OOS options and crouch options are stupid good if you don't have some way to negate them. for every character that isn't peach, that means grabbing a lot. sorry amsah but i don't feel like SH FF autocancel fair camping for 5 minutes is going to cut it.
i don't think marth is worse in the newer metagame because he's worse vs sheik, but because he doesn't have fox/falco as "strong" matches anymore.
that was the age of techskill. Non-technical Fox's will get *****.This sounds accurate. Iirc, wasn't Fox v. Marth at one time considered 60:40 for Marth on a chart?
Yea that's actually a pretty good summary of how sheik controls the stage I think. I find myself fighting cornered a lot in this MU, although I don't really mind that. I'm still able to outspace her without (much) stage behind me. I'd say if you position yourself under the center of the opposite side platform you will be out of range of needle fair stuff and positioned to pounce on her if she does that. If she gives up on that and tries to fight you on the ground you still have a BIT of stage behind you and enough stage that you can still do some tricky stuff with wavelands and retreat fair camping or just flat out approach her if it's there.sheik should beat marth like 60/40, give or take a little either way.
if you're playing on FD then marth's DD camping > sheik's inability to approach and he can lame her out pretty easily. with platforms though marth has a very hard time preventing her from gaining stage control because none of his hitboxes stay out and in many cases marth can be punished even if he hits because he hit with a non-tip. sheik should be able to slowly but reliably take over stage control to kill marth 1 stock at a time.
marth has no range advantage on sheik for any practical purpose. like he might have "more" but it's not where you want it to be except dtilt, and if you misplace the tip hit you get grabbed pretty easily. they should both **** each other pretty bad once a positional advantage has been established.
i think amsah is wrong when he says US sheiks rely on grabs too much. US PLAYERS rely on grabs a LOT out of necessity because OOS options and crouch options are stupid good if you don't have some way to negate them. for every character that isn't peach, that means grabbing a lot. sorry amsah but i don't feel like SH FF autocancel fair camping for 5 minutes is going to cut it.
i don't think marth is worse in the newer metagame because he's worse vs sheik, but because he doesn't have fox/falco as "strong" matches anymore.