If your desired destination was a coffin or a jail cell, I suppose it was the smart thing to do.In a sense it was smart because I would get to my destination quicker.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
If your desired destination was a coffin or a jail cell, I suppose it was the smart thing to do.In a sense it was smart because I would get to my destination quicker.
You'd be surprised.Well whichever genius read my post should've read yours too.
In that case, they'll know I was just trying to condense the post length and answer one specific part.
People get so upset over these things.![]()
It's not that I wanted to speed. It's more that my tunnel vision basically told me to beat curfew. Obviously a bad idea.If you really want to speed just go to the nearest drag strip.
Served you right.My first ticket was doing 110 in a 65 >>;
oh i totally deserved itServed you right.![]()
My first ticket was doing 110 in a 65 >>;
i seriously dont get that19 and i got a $100 fine
paid it in ones
you hit the nail on the head...Amazing Post...
Here is the thing. Drivers have different reaction times. Just because YOU can control your car going 130, doesn't mean someone else can. And, in general, traffic law have to cater to every type of vehicle, including tractor trailers.I have long suspected it's just propaganda that driving fast is dangerous. I definitely know that speed limits in general are WAY lower than any actually good driver could ever need. Take side streets for example. The general speed limit is 25. I speed nearly universally in that, 30 in general or 35ish if I feel pretty confident there are no cops around. Really, I should be going 40 at certain times on those streets; it's not unsafe at all. If you can't avoid kids and such at that speed, I'm going to be blunt and say you have no business driving at all.
The topic creator was going 93 mph; that's not a universally unsafe speed. On a straight, open highway in good condition with few other drivers and good weather, that's very reasonable if you just think in terms of what's safe and not in terms of the law. Given that the speed limit of the road he was on was, I suspect it was a highway. Given that he was even able to get up to 93, I suspect there were few other drivers. Given that he just got a ticket, we might even suspect he was on some far-flung country highway; if you've ever driven cross-country, you'd know that 93 is a very reasonable speed for places like that as long as you don't get caught (unless you're really good at talking your way out of tickets). There's a good chance what he was doing was, in fact, safe (assuming he's a skillful driver); the law is just wrong in this case.
I mean, here are the things that are actually unsafe:
-Driving while distracted. I could do 130 about as safely as someone on a cell phone can do 55. Actually, I might do better with 130. 130 isn't something I'd be comfortable driving on a road with any other people, but at least you can be guaranteed I'd be paying attention to what's going on. Also, constantly watching your speedometer, which you basically have to do to avoid speeding, is distracting. I suspect the speed limits actually make us less safe because of this. Without them, you could just keep up with traffic and not think about it, knowing you're safe. I know if there were no limits, I would almost never look at my speedometer; you can't deny that every moment you look at that you aren't looking at the road and the things that could get in your way.
-Not using turn signals. You know, this is a "petty" traffic violation that is, in fact, actually dangerous (unlike speeding). I don't give people room to get in unless they signal pretty much no matter what; no one knows what you're doing if you don't signal and can only assume you're going straight. The example of someone cutting you off is given as a reason you might need to suddenly stop, but think about it. How can anyone surprisingly cut you off if they properly use their turn signals? The fact that people seem to think this is a less big deal than speeding is really an example of the wrongheadedness the law promotes; I've never been in an accident with another driver, but every time I've been scared, it has been because the other driver didn't signal (of course, I wouldn't swerve out of the way unless I knew I was clear; I'd just hit them if I had to).
I mean, yeah, there are limits to how fast you should be going depending on situations; eventually it's just reckless. However, just speeding in general is not dangerous; all the laws do is make criminals out of normal people. Even if you try to follow the law (despite the massive time you waste because of it, remembering that basically everyone speeds), you can easily accidentally break it and get fined. They even sometimes make absurd, freedom limiting laws like "you can't own radar scanners" to try to perpetuate what is ultimate unenforceable; why do people support this? What evidence do people even have that speeding is unsafe? The only system I've ever seen to fairly test no speed limits on a serious scale is the autobahn... which if I recall is one of the safest roads in the world. I'm fairly well convinced that it is doing things right.
The TC made a mistake insofar as he violated a law with a steep punishment, but I don't see any evidence that he did anything that actually endangered anyone. He kinda got ganged up on in this topic; I don't think you guys were very fair to him.
You can't always avoid the kids. The faster you go, the less time you have to react when a kid runs on to the road.Take side streets for example. The general speed limit is 25. I speed nearly universally in that, 30 in general or 35ish if I feel pretty confident there are no cops around. Really, I should be going 40 at certain times on those streets; it's not unsafe at all. If you can't avoid kids and such at that speed, I'm going to be blunt and say you have no business driving at all.
Oh woooooow.Guess who got another speeding ticket for a completely stupid reason....
**** my ghetto *** car....
>___>Guess who got another speeding ticket for a completely stupid reason....
**** my ghetto *** car....
Darn it! You beat me by exactly 6 MPH, lolMy first ticket was doing 110 in a 65 >>;
heh good luck! they got a 3-strike rule? Cause if they do, you're down to 1, buddy. Be. Careful. And get that ghetto ride fixed up. Don't want get pulled over for Improper Equipment (headlights, taillights, obstructions in rear-view, etc etc). Your window-winding won't qualify for that, but if that's any indication in the quality of your ride, who knows what all else is F'd up on it.Exactly 7 days until I go to court.![]()
I don't believe you can perry in our legal system.heh good luck! they got a 3-strike rule?
Or in a construction zone.at least it wasn't in a school zone
the only ticket I have ever got was a seat belt ticketOr in a construction zone.
There is so much god**** construction going on here in Oregon all the time on the roads -_-
Maybe that's why I almost never speed and as a result have never gotten a ticket because of it.