Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Don't be dumb Tblock hunny, if you MK your self (lol metakirby) it'll cut twilight IF you are town.
Hunny, why did you ask this?
The Joey-case-dropping aside, I don't really like T-block that much. His claim is debunkable on a deeper level: it's questionable as to whether one-way mason Coco and spiral anti-spiral miller Nia are even in the same segment of the anime. I take the miller role is heavily linked with spiral anti-spiral, and given that Coco is only 'one-way' until like episode 10 (which isn't anywhere near the part where anti-spirals are introduced), I say that this particular claim doesn't hold quite as much water. The old one watching over Nia is certainly not Coco. That much crumbing seems like overcompensation and doesn't convince me at all. I wouldn't be surprised if the claim was true because I doubt kuz put that much effort into this (probs just wanted to use the role), but if you think about it, T-block's claims could actually fit the big bad villain of part 2 - watching over Nia from afar, etc.
Dammit zen. Get caught up and put your vote somewhere (hint hint).
Man **** that. Joey is so scum. ESPECIALLY ON A T-BLOCK TOWN FLIP.
If you mean #83 that wasn't a response. It didn't answer anything. I was trying to get a town clear on him by confirming his posting restriction.
I'll try to go over the thread again and see what I can do. I fear I'm gonna spend a lot of time rationalizing a player when I don't even know why he did what he did. My initial reaction is if Joey was flip flopping, why is that weird on D1? If people were giving him legit reasons why his stances were bad, it seems rational to me that he would back off, reconsider, and possibly change his mind.
It's more of I wanted to make sure it wasn't another one of your famous gambits and I had my notes correct on that matter at least. Thanks.
That's okay, Raziek. I felt my asking was more important than you accepting.
His posting restriction was essentially softclaiming a character, not a role. Character claims are always a handbag of WIFOM because it could just as easily be a safeclaim rather than the actual role (read: I'm not asking for LAK's role). They are, essentially, unprovable, as you have to weigh their actions with what they claimed and, unlike roleclaims, you have no night actions to confirm their honesty.
Inactive, inactive, inactive, inactive, guy on the lynchblock who is going V/LA.Votecount said:
First off, I regret my knee jerk reaction to WL's post. It was generally useless, but that was my reaction. I don't want to play emotional and irritable as I have been in previous games, so I hope to get away from that and have tried to do as much in my last few posts.
This kinda bothers me. Do you believe T-block's claim now or not? Because it seems to me that you're kinda covering all possibilities with this statement.
I lol'ed.
