Here's a sum of my thoughts on the matter.
Most of the people I talk with nowadays that think they're in Elo Hell aren't delusional about being unrealistically unlucky. (Those people are just stupid.) They complain that they don't have the time to play enough games to get out of their bracket, only being able to play 1 or 2 games a day. With each game being 75% luck, theoretically, it's gonna take a really long time to get to your "true elo" or w/e if you're a "1300 player" and legitimately got unlucky for your first 3 placement matches and got dragged down to 1100.
The better the player you are, the easier it is to gain elo at first, but it always gets a lot harder when you're nearing your correct elo, relatively. For example, if you're a "1900 player," 1200-1600~ should be a pretty easy climb. You're able to crush your lane, **** the map, and win just out of pure skill. Your climb from 1700-1900 you might take a while. HOWEVER, if you're a "1300 player," and don't happen to end up at around 1300 after the placement matches, the entire climb is likely going to be rigorous for a number of reasons that don't affect higher elos
as much, but still affect it:
- The likelyhood of queueing up with and against players that got lucky/unlucky during placement matches is higher. You're not going to run into those players as nearly as often up in the 1800s, statistically.
- Low elo is a lot more volatile in that people's conceptions on how to play the game are drastically different from one another. The higher your elo is, the more organized the gameplay is, and the more universally understood strategies are. There's a lot more room for miscommunication.
- Leavers/AFKs are more common at lower elos. Adds more luck to the equation.
In that regard, Elo Hell
does exist, and it's a result of this game being 5v5 and not 1v1.