Man, I'm in a bad mood. I really wish I could meet you in real life, so I could just beat the **** out of you for being such a *******. It's so easy to have no accountability over forums. Lucky you I guess.
That doesn't sound prepubescent.
Not at all.
Also, for the Go vs Chess analogy. It's called scope. Go is simpler than Chess. Stop trying to argue something obvious.
Scope...?
If we're looking at scope, then DMG's example still trumps your piss-poor analogy.
Random Dictionary said:
1. extent or range of view, outlook, application, operation, effectiveness, etc.: an investigation of wide scope.
If you even bothered to give even a cursory GLANCE at the article, you would have seen that, in spite of it's simpler ruleset, there's a helluva lot more potential in moving your pieces around a 21X21 board. It's not as linear as Chess pieces. They even presented mathematical formulas (infinsomethings) to present their case versus what's available in Chess. There were a lot more permutations found there than in any other board game.
If anything, you were putting blinders over yourself and really not seeing DMG's point. Hence, your range (or "scope") is actually fairly limiting. Concise juxtaposition; ever hear of it? Apparently not. Also, see "respect for other people's opinions." You clearly need a refresher course or two because, quite frankly, you're acting like one of those "kids on the internet that aren't accountable for ****," 'cause it's (apparently) okay for you to shoot off at the mouth on a forum without any regard to the people involved or the facts present. Which, in case you didn't know, is ****ing hypocritical.
Sorry if this prompts another flame war, mods. It's just irritating me to no end and I had to get it off of my chest. Feel free to infract me.
Smooth Criminal