Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
That would be so cool, with how much you can do in MC there’s so much you could do in a stage builder
That would actually be a very interesting way to represent Minecraft in Smash Brothers.
TerminalMontage
I think some stuff about a Direct was said but more importantly I made a joke about pencils.
Aw man but I like the stage builder. Don’t ruin it for me.
Personal headcanon: that's Bazooka Toad. He just remembered to bring his bazooka this time.
He would have annihilated Smithy himself, but he just so happened to run out of ammo by the time he reached you.
Square got the rights to use Mario enemies in the game, correct, but some of the Mario enemies in the game use completely different names because they probably couldn't get the rights to use their names in the game, or didn't want to pay for their names, so they made their own names for some Mario enemies.
I can't wait till they have a Fan Favorite Spirits event. Just to rub more salt in the wound.
This was super helpful and the examples were great!Square got the rights to use Mario enemies in the game, correct, but some of the Mario enemies in the game use completely different names because they probably couldn't get the rights to use their names in the game, or didn't want to pay for their names, so they made their own names for some Mario enemies.
The Beezos (The Fly Guys from SMB2) in the game are called "Shy Aways" because Square possibly couldn't get the rights to their original names, hence why they use that name.
I guess Square didn't get the rights to use Koopa Troopas, so they made their own Koopa Troopa species and designs for them, and their names go under "Terrapin" for the green-shelled Koopa and "Terra Cotta" for the red-shelled Koopa.
The Shy Guys on pogo sticks in the game are called "Shysters", but since they had the rights to use "Shy Guy", I doubt this one was an issue.
These are Bill Blasters, but they're called "Blaster" and "Big Bertha" in SMRPG.
Lava Bubbles are called "Sparky", probably because Square didn't get the rights to their OG name.
Cheep Cheeps go under the name "Goby", and you basically get the rest..
And as for the alternative names of the Mario enemies, that means those names are owned by Square, which is why we haven't seen those names on a Mario enemy ever since Super Mario RPG.
Not really rumors but just speculation on Fatmanonice's part
So would I, honestly
This is such an anime plot twist for me lol. Thanks for clarifying!I've been asked this a few times, so I'll clarify here. I am a SHE. So, if you refer to my info, that is the pronoun you should use
Well I still repeat the points from #28,804, personally I think this is not a valid point here. As others noted, it is also a concern whether Sakurai does have bigger power in nominations of Sm4sh or Ultimate this time.
Perhaps I'm not too familiar when it comes to theories of "popularity with in Japan or in western fandoms". Just I wonder if there have been realstic cases of Mario a character that is especially popular in only western culture or in Japan eventually gets big bigger role in the Mario franchise while the other side doesn't. I feel like KingKRool isn't that unpopular in either western or eastern side, for example.
I'm trying to recall if KingdomHearts have such examples of characters that was based on an existed reference but is created by the other company . At least we can confirm that all original characters like Sora and Kairi in that game were created by Square. It feels like the original characters from SMRPG worked in the same way with KingdomHearts that they were not made by Nintendo.
I understand your intention, but I don't try to stand by any side of opinions of confirming spirits/assists/background characters. The point is still that many popular candidates are there, any of them can be the one to break the "deconfirming" theory. If we only main at a specific character then this would not be too relevant.
Persona is already an independent franchise that has English releases. But why would Nintendo has a say in the subject? It's owned by ATLUS and SEGA.
terribly sorry if I ever said otherwise I usually default to male pronouns when talking about people on the internet if I dont know, also I tend to use "guy"/"guys" and "dude"/"dudes" gender neutrally but thats just skater punk lingo from my past being hard to shake hahaI've been asked this a few times, so I'll clarify here. I am a SHE. So, if you refer to my info, that is the pronoun you should use
Yeah, the possibility has been brought up before. It'd be a clever way to bring back the Stage Builder.
Me too. Even if I would prefer for Super Macho Man to get in first.
Well, you know how it is, that pesky stereotype of "there are no girls on the Internet" is prevalent in the World Wide Web. There's a reason the term "I'm a girl by the way" is used semi-ironically sometimes.
Huh, that's interesting, here I and other people thought that the name changes were because Ted Woolsey took some liberties.Square got the rights to use Mario enemies in the game, correct, but some of the Mario enemies in the game use completely different names because they probably couldn't get the rights to use their names in the game, or didn't want to pay for their names, so they made their own names for some Mario enemies.
The Beezos (The Fly Guys from SMB2) in the game are called "Shy Aways" because Square possibly couldn't get the rights to their original names, hence why they use that name.
I guess Square didn't get the rights to use Koopa Troopas, so they made their own Koopa Troopa species and designs for them, and their names go under "Terrapin" for the green-shelled Koopa and "Terra Cotta" for the red-shelled Koopa.
The Shy Guys on pogo sticks in the game are called "Shysters", but since they had the rights to use "Shy Guy", I doubt this one was an issue.
These are Bill Blasters, but they're called "Blaster" and "Big Bertha" in SMRPG.
Lava Bubbles are called "Sparky", probably because Square didn't get the rights to their OG name.
Cheep Cheeps go under the name "Goby", and you basically get the rest..
And as for the alternative names of the Mario enemies, that means those names are owned by Square, which is why we haven't seen those names on a Mario enemy ever since Super Mario RPG.
This idea never made sense to me. If they can bring Stage Builder back via DLC, why don't they just do it? Why it needs an expensive IP paint-job?
Featuring Dante from the Devil May Cry Series & Knuckles! SP!
It would be the best way to represent Minecraft in Smash.
Yeah, I don't want to rain on anyone's parades, but I just don't see that happening. Erdrick has a lot of negotiation behind him, and the music situation is likely to be hell due to Sugiyama's track record on usage + Square's own stinginess, but Sakurai is a miracle worker. This isn't like base game where it'd be that much tougher to pull off more than two tracks, as compensation will actually be given + Sugiyama is present, where Uematsu has taken a health leave.
We won't get Mario music with another franchise rep, that is undeniable. However, as I've pointed out before, the game only has 3 empty music slots, which implies at most only 3 new series are involved for the season pass with a character to go along with them. The other 2 characters will most likely be from franchises already in Smash, and Geno is a possibility due to his Mario connections, and it's very clear that Nintendo and Sakurai don't have any problems with more Mario characters being added.
This is the best option. Minecraft stage builder and maybe a Steve Mii costume for Mii Brawler. No offense to those who want him, but I REALLY don't want Steve anywhere near the character select screen. If anything from Microsoft gets there, it should be Banjo. And this is coming from someone who doesn't like third parties in the game.
I only think there's nothing we can really do when they announce it with already done the DLCs (not like "Hey! Take that thing back and do something else instead"), but in an ojective view, it is a problem when that really happens. However, I think "no one expect this surprise" thing might have decreased the chances of more Mario DLCs but rather increases chances of yet unused franchises.
Basically hints on Miyamoto and the others litereally did nothing. (not sarcasm, somehow true here)
I'm sorry, but I'm... really having trouble understanding what you're trying to say. I think the language barriers are proving to be a bit of a problem, and while I normally don't mind that, when pitching big arguments, it kinda just causes a lot of problems for both parties, I'm afraid. It's nice to have all kinds of different viewpoints, but I can't help but be rather confused by your posts more often than not...
I'm no native speaker so sorry for that I cannot make clear points sometimes. I appreciate your opinions here, thanks.
I understand! I know I'd be stumbling bad if I tried to even approach other languages, so I apologize if I sounded a bit unreasonable. I can imagine it's got to be frustrating on your end, too.
It would probably help if we had more context, like what thread this was posted in. There's probably a rumoured Nintendo Direct for just about every weekday for the past month or so - I'm exaggerating, but only slightly.
Honestly, there's probably going to be a Direct yesterday. I'd know, I have my sources and inside information spreading some stuff.
Of note is that it was posted by King Zell, who has predicted Directs in the past and has been proven to have connections. I believe he was the one who leaked Pokemon Let's Go? Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe he was the one who did that.
