Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
It dropped by literally over half before it ended. I saw it go down as far 73k from the 150k it started with and it wasn't even wrapping up. It was bad.Apparently the live stream dropped around 30-40k views in less than 2 minutes after they showed off the wayforward game. Massive oof
massive yikes. The worst part off it all was it was Nintendo’s fault for setting everyone’s expectations up and ruining them. I did t expect much but damnnn Nintendo.It dropped by literally over half before it ended. I saw it go down as far 73k from the 150k it started with and it wasn't even wrapping up. It was bad.
I wasn't expecting it to be big or anything, clearly not 1st party or earth shattering. But the fact they teased something new, showing along Paper Mario's stream, made me interested in at least seeing what it was.Eh I didn't really care about Wayforward's announcement anyways
Why, because Nintendo decided to hype up a bad licensed anime game? Please. We don't know a single game that was meant to be at E3. This likely just got cobbled together when Nintendo remembered they needed to actually promote Origami King.Lookin more and more like Nintendo’s 2020 E3 conference was going to be as bad as their 2008 one—where their big reveal was Wii Music—they’re probably relieved that E3 was canceled.
Yeh i was thinking the same, basically the only hope left for mario rpgs is super mario rpgThe state of Mario RPGs is extremely dire right now.
For whatever reason Intelligent Systems seems extremely stubborn and the likelihood of Paper Mario ever becoming good again looks slimmer each game.
And Mario and Luigi? It don't even have the luxury of getting bad games, it isn't getting any games.
Maybe it's time to start hoping for Super Mario RPG 2 to come to the rescue because I think there's a 0% chance of Paper Mario going back to its roots under Tanabe. I tried to give TOK a chance but each time I see it I am left disappointed.
If anything, I think it's more chance for for Mario RPG to have a revival, since Paper Mario isn't filling that gap.The state of Mario RPGs is extremely dire right now.
For whatever reason Intelligent Systems seems extremely stubborn and the likelihood of Paper Mario ever becoming good again looks slimmer each game.
And Mario and Luigi? It don't even have the luxury of getting bad games, it isn't getting any games.
Maybe it's time to start hoping for Super Mario RPG 2 to come to the rescue because I think there's a 0% chance of Paper Mario going back to its roots under Tanabe. I tried to give TOK a chance but each time I see it I am left disappointed.
Paper Mario TOK looks way better than Sticker Star and Color Splash, and the latter is better than the former, so I don´t know. It certainly doesn´t look like it will return to form though that's for sure.The state of Mario RPGs is extremely dire right now.
For whatever reason Intelligent Systems seems extremely stubborn and the likelihood of Paper Mario ever becoming good again looks slimmer each game.
And Mario and Luigi? It don't even have the luxury of getting bad games, it isn't getting any games.
Maybe it's time to start hoping for Super Mario RPG 2 to come to the rescue because I think there's a 0% chance of Paper Mario going back to its roots under Tanabe. I tried to give TOK a chance but each time I see it I am left disappointed.
I think it's gonna be a super paper mario situation tbh. And I'm fine with itPaper Mario TOK looks way better than Sticker Star and Color Splash, and the latter is better than the former, so I don´t know. It certainly doesn´t look like it will return to form though that's for sure.
What you are describing, a paper mario game in everything but gameplay? I think that pretty much sums up this game, except it's actually closer in gameplay than super paper mario.Super Paper Mario was a traditional Paper Mario game in everything BUT gameplay. Same writing style, same tone, same kinds of interesting locations and characters, a more involved story that stepped out of line with the traditional Mario-fare, it feels like the first two. These modern games do not. Even if you gave Sticker Star or Color Splash the more traditional battle system they would still be inferior to those first three games. (Obviously brainstorming that also implies there would be partners but how do you even do that when every friendly character is a god damn toad).
Here's what Jeff Grubb had to say about the battle system, pretty bad sign.View attachment 277962
It's a sad state of affairsSuper Paper Mario was a traditional Paper Mario game in everything BUT gameplay. Same writing style, same tone, same kinds of interesting locations and characters, a more involved story that stepped out of line with the traditional Mario-fare, it feels like the first two. These modern games do not. Even if you gave Sticker Star or Color Splash the more traditional battle system they would still be inferior to those first three games. (Obviously brainstorming that also implies there would be partners but how do you even do that when every friendly character is a god damn toad).
Here's what Jeff Grubb had to say about the battle system, pretty bad sign.View attachment 277962
And their names both start with a B...I chose sleeping over the treehouse announcement. I am laughing my ass off the Bakugan announcement. Remember guys, if the insiders make a list of who isn't, it's gonna be a dissapointment.
(Byleth,Bakugan)
Makes me wonder if Paper Mario is in a kind of personality crisisIf they just made Paper Mario actually match its new genre and be similar to how 3D Zelda plays then it'd be perfect if they really want to ditch the old RPG gameplay.
It almost feels as if they are trying to make a new mechanic work within this series. I like puzzles so this kind of catches my attention, but as a BIG RPG guy, the no experience points leaves no incentive to do battles. I really like the idea of puzzle battles (Turn based combat to a new level) and makes this unique. It is not an RPG and we have to live with that. Now hopefully, Nintendo and Square are in REALLY good terms now that...oh you know...they could make a Mario RPG game.Makes me wonder if Paper Mario is in a kind of personality crisis
I thought maybe i'd be biased about there being no xp, since I really love rpg elements, but seeing so many people not glad about it does make me wonder if maybe Nintendo hasn't thought it through. If you only get money from the battles, and that's the incentive, then what's the point in also making so many battle mechanics use up money?
I like the idea of it being more like Zelda, but then it wouldn't be unique. Puzzle battles is a bit new. Some people enjoy solving puzzles, so I think anyone who likes puzzle mechanics could hav fun.
I remember the wii Years, terrible years for being a nintendo fan. Most e3´s after Brawl sucked. It also made me trade a wii for a psp and a dreamcast in hope of better games.The reactions wouldn't be as bad if Nintendo wasn't doing a horrible job advertising themselves this year. You finally decide to announce something, have tens of thousands eyes on you, and THIS is what you use that previous time for? They thought this required its own showcase. DKC coming to NSO would have been a much better idea to announce here.
All the insiders can keep hint hint nudge nudging all these potential big plans Nintendo has this year all they want, because right now Nintendo themselves is saying that they have nothing.
I think the new stuff is interesting including the battle system, but I'm so afraid it's going to all feel pointless like everyone is saying. The stuff that costs money seems too cheap, and it looked like they started the first area with 7000 coins. Rupees are also easy to get in Zelda, but the gameplay and how you progress makes everything feel good and balanced, meanwhile this money system in Paper Mario looks kinda disappointing (and in Zelda you have to go out of your way to do stuff to get rupees, so even if they're easy to get and stock up on, it's not like the game is giving them to you)...there's still the bosses you have to beat, of course, but that's about it. Why have enemies you can't just whack without an RPG battle sequence if you can just run past them and be just as effective at progressing through the area and still have a bunch of coins and confetti for stuff?Makes me wonder if Paper Mario is in a kind of personality crisis
I thought maybe i'd be biased about there being no xp, since I really love rpg elements, but seeing so many people not glad about it does make me wonder if maybe Nintendo hasn't thought it through. If you only get money from the battles, and that's the incentive, then what's the point in also making so many battle mechanics use up money?
I like the idea of it being more like Zelda, but then it wouldn't be unique. Puzzle battles is a bit new. Some people enjoy solving puzzles, so I think anyone who likes puzzle mechanics could hav fun.
Kelios said that even he don't know nothing about the direct, he think that the people should have little hopesLet's just hope the July 20th Direct is not only real, but also loaded with more pleasant surprises