This post is massive, I'm sorry. Also gets fairly off-topic >.>
Sorry but no.
A) We have the Assist Trophy squad that will go "YOU MAKE THIS MF PLAYABLE BUT NOT X OR Y" which will be a big deal.
If people cry over an AT being promoted, it just means Isaac, Shadow, Knuckles, Zero, etc has a chance of being DLC down the road.
B) Waluigi is mostly known because of memes. The Waluigi fanbase isn¨t exactly a fanbase that is taken seriously.
He's still missing and we should have more Mario characters.
PS: A LITERAL !@#$ING POTTED PLANT GOT IN BEFORE WALUIGI, and you're going to talk about memes being a
NEGATIVE?
C) It would signal to people that... oh, so we just had to send enough death treats to Sakurai and we would have our character playable. Yes, it was not the majority but it would still signal that.
Sakurai gets death threats for every character they want in, or ones they don't when one gets revealed.
*OCD intensifies*
It will be even more argument about "wasted slots" than before.
Ehhhh... Not if Sakurai makes a *real* character out of Waluigi. That's more than worth a slot.
Nintendo literally mocked the Smash fanbase in Byleth's trailer. Waluigi would make headlines the world over, no small exaggeration. Controversial? Yes. Would he sell like crazy? Holy hell, yes. A character that even Sakurai himself has mocked for not being playable becoming playable would be huge for a ton of reasons. Yes, not everyone wants him but people who don't think he would be a nuke of an announcement and be one of the best selling DLC characters are sadly mistaken.
Thank you Fatman, you always know how to put my thoughts into words. I'm notoriously terrible at forming coherent sentences.
Upgrading him would cause more harm then good.
It really wouldn't. Byleth being added caused way more harm, especially when the Smash community was mocked during their reveal.
Just to make one thing abundantly clear before I start. As long as the character isn¨t someone like Son Goku, Naruto, Batman (aka 4rh part reps) I¨m open minded towards anyone. I have my preference sure, but as I said. I¨m open-minded. With that said
Sakurai has gone on record saying any non-video game character is pretty much ineligible. All those characters you named have obviously been in video games, but they are not "video game characters" (similar to how Mario has been in a movie... kinda, and a few TV series, but in the same way, he's not a movie/cartoon character). Unless he changes his mind, none of those characters will ever be put in.
You are comparing base game towards DLC. That¨s a big difference.
Need I say it again about a
literal potted plant that even Sakurai acknowledges is a joke character that you can no longer get for free and must pay for?
Edit - yes Geno would get anger from the "spirit group", but he has still less "backlash factors" going for him if he would be upgraded compared Waluigi
*you see both Byleths just waving from the distance, Smash invitations in hand despite the horde of angry people*
I find it funny how most of the fans who say Smash has too many Mario characters are salty Fire Emblem fans trying to be contrarian, because that argument only started popping up when Fire Emblem was being put under that same light.
How anyonme can think Smash has too many Mario characters, Nintendo's primary mascot/universe, is beyond me,
Just to remind everyone: Mario has 9, 1 of which is a total joke character (Plant), 1 of which is an Echo that is heavily memeable like Waluigi (Daisy). Fire Emblem has 8. EIGHT compared to Mario's NINE. Nintendo's PRIMARY mascot/series, and it has 9 characters, 10 if you count Yoshi (I probably would), 11 for Wario (also kinda would), and 12 for DK (I wouldn't here). Even still, Mario universe needs more characters. Waluigi and Geno would bolster that number nicely (even though Geno is barely a Mario character, just happens to exist in Mario's universe, kinda like Link and Samus in SMRPG, haha).
Good lord, this. Mario currently has 9 characters, the biggest franchise in gaming, while Fire Emblem has 8.
Isn't Pokemon technically "bigger"? Depends by the definition of "bigger", I guess. More well known among everyone, even non-gamers? Then yeah I'd agree with you in that Mario is the most recognizable icon of gaming.
That comment has mostly being created of the annoyance that is ""¤%"%¤"% they might as well call it Super Fire Emblem Bros" at this point when they don¨t even have the most amount of characters
Because Fire Emblem has a disproportionate amount of characters compared to others like Zelda and Kirby, both of which are way more known. Ffs, Pokemon has 10 if you count Pkmn Trainer as 3. POKEMON, the game with over EIGHT HUNDRED characters (FE is up to what, 600?) and is not only infinitely more successful, but infinitely more known than FE.
I'm just going to go ahead and say it: by far, FE has more characters than the series has any right deserving in the game compared to all series in Smash, and this is coming from
someone who probably likes Fire Emblem more than he likes Smash. It would not matter if they all played vastly unique from one another and they all had different weapons (Sword, Lance, Axe, Bow, Magic, Byleth [all weapons], Robin [all magic], some 8th character who has all weapons and all magic), the series does not deserve as much as it has, not while other series like Zelda and Kirby have way less and are also more popular and well-known series. Fire Emblem is big, yes, but not *that* big, especially in the West. But anyway, we're done with FE; the chances of them adding another FE character during FP2 is practically nonexistent unless they truly wanted to piss everyone off because that would be a backlash significantly bigger than Byleth's.
All that said, we're going/have gone way off-topic now as usual, so let's reel it back in a bit.