BoyMan
Smash Cadet
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2014
- Messages
- 56
Gordon or any TF2 character would be amazing in my book.So what do Geno fans think about Gordon Freeman? Just curious.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Gordon or any TF2 character would be amazing in my book.So what do Geno fans think about Gordon Freeman? Just curious.
You're only saying that because you're worried Falcon will use his glock if they do that.Honestly, I wouldn't change many peoples move sets much, if at all. Most are grandfathered in and would cause a lot of backlash. Even if Captain Falcon, for example, could have an entire new move set made that is more 'accurate', you alienate loads of people. Even if his move set isn't 'fitting', it has become his quintessential move set for 5 games going now. People love his move set and the way he plays. He's the 'hype train' character and feels good and, often, disrespectful. It's part of his history and charm through the franchise now.
If they were going to do this for lots of characters, they'd better let people know WAY ahead of time. Because all I know is if Falcon got overhauled completely, he wouldn't BE Falcon anymore. Not in the context of Smash Bros, anyway.
Guns scary!You're only saying that because you're worried Falcon will use his glock if they do that.
"Show me your moves!"You're only saying that because you're worried Falcon will use his glock if they do that.
The obvious ones like Ganondorf and Sonic would be nice to be redone, but I would really like to see the all the Link's get overhauledSince this thread seems to have slowed down, let me pose a question!
If you could pick five veterans to give the Ultimate moveset treatment to, who would it be?
If Mario isn't on everyone's list, I'll be baffled. I would also have Donkey Kong and Sonic as the other top picks. I also would put Luigi higher up too, as nowadays a moveset with his Poltergust would make a lot of sense.
If I had to pick a fifth, that'd be harder as the ones I listed above I think need a more drastic change. Though I would also say that maybe make Wario's more diverse with Wario Land stuff (though that isn't a necessity), and maybe give Samus a more updated toolkit. Maybe you could also give Link a more Breath of the Wild inspired moveset, and maybe you could make a moveset for Yoshi more based off of Yoshi's Island?
...oh and Ganondorf too of course. Though I actually think he works pretty well in Ultimate (though not ideal).
Edit: Veterans as in characters not new to Ultimate. Though I guess if you really hated a newcomer's moveset you could change it.
Yeah, no reason Toon Link doesn't have the Grappling Hook as his tether instead of the hook shot. I wish Young Link had a chance of pulling a Bombchu with Down-B, and that they would scurry off if Z-dropped.The obvious ones like Ganondorf and Sonic would be nice to be redone, but I would really like to see the all the Link's get overhauled
Adult Link is fun, and the bomb changes do a good job of representing the element of experimentation from BOTW, but man, I would really like to see his kit overhauled completely to match BOTW Link more. I really would've really like to see some his runes play into his moveset more as well as the Champions abilities. And with a new game on the horizon, Link is bound to get some new abilities to his kit. There's just a lot they can do, I wish they leaned into it more
Young Link I wish would've taken more from Majora's Mask. Make him like Pokemon Trainer and have his down B transfer between different mask transformations. That would be extremely fun. If they ever bring back transformation final smashes, use Fierce Dirty for Young Link's
For Toon Link, give him some items from Wind Waker. The Skull Hammer, Korok Leaf, and Grappling Hook. Incorporate that rolling counter attack in some capacity
Each Link can easily be distinct from one another and just be fun to play with. Making them distinct would also better represent Zelda as well
Dr. MarioSince this thread seems to have slowed down, let me pose a question!
If you could pick five veterans to give the Ultimate moveset treatment to, who would it be?
If Mario isn't on everyone's list, I'll be baffled. I would also have Donkey Kong and Sonic as the other top picks. I also would put Luigi higher up too, as nowadays a moveset with his Poltergust would make a lot of sense.
If I had to pick a fifth, that'd be harder as the ones I listed above I think need a more drastic change. Though I would also say that maybe make Wario's more diverse with Wario Land stuff (though that isn't a necessity), and maybe give Samus a more updated toolkit. Maybe you could also give Link a more Breath of the Wild inspired moveset, and maybe you could make a moveset for Yoshi more based off of Yoshi's Island?
...oh and Ganondorf too of course. Though I actually think he works pretty well in Ultimate (though not ideal).
Edit: Veterans as in characters not new to Ultimate. Though I guess if you really hated a newcomer's moveset you could change it.
Right now with in a span of a few weeks we're getting mods of very good looking Mallow & Cacodemon Mii Hats with little to no issues in response to trying to disprove the leak. Seeing how Mii Costumes aren't as difficult to make that we thought they were it seems entirely possible that some people are able to make Mii Hats with that type of quality give they had plenty of time. I feel it's safe to just write it off and move on, just like that one Palutena 3DS leak that turned out to be fake.When has there ever been something to gain from a leak being right aside from knowing of something before it's been officially announced? Like, did somebody give you cookies for backing the right leaks or rumors back in the day? And the CacoMallow post hasn't been fully or even partially disproven yet. The only thing that's changed since it was first posted is that others have been able to create their own versions of it, which isn't anywhere near a flat-out disconfirmation.
There is literally no need to keep any leaks in mind, especially from 4chan. Monkeys and Typewriters. But trying to give arguments here when opposing leaks never works. There's was that one 4chan post that mention Terry & Ryu and everyone was like "yeah that make sense that the last two trailers are continuations of old trailers and that Ryu Hayabusa will take place in Simon's Trailer," but then I come in and say "won't it make sense that Ryu's trailer is actually the opening of the first Ninja Gaiden game with Greninja. I don't think they would have them paired up in Dracula's Castle," but then I get yelled at for being skeptical.Not true. There are plenty of ways to cast doubt on a rumor/leak, you just need to try hard enough, but given your style or argumentation that seems like an near-impossibility for you. The Frogger Post correctly guessed the livestream date, but that's the bare minimum a post like that needs to be considered worthy of discussion. That didn't mean it was real, or that the rest of it was 100% real, it just meant that it was something to keep in mind going forward. Not every 4chan post that gets things right is considered worthy of discussion by us, we're not a gang of LaxChrises who don't look into or question anything and just blindly believe everything we hear.
REALLY?! You're trying to legitimately you guys "learn your lesson" from the Grinch Leak when we're still believing in leaks? No, nobody learned anything. We had this entire board go crazy because PapaGenos said that his source from the Mii Hats said Crash was the fifth fighter, remember? Remember how everyone was going on "That one guy who said Ryu Hayabusa was going to be the fighter, TOTALLY DEAD WRONG! CRASH IN SMASH! This one guy that we barely know about who said these Mii Costumes are in is totally without a doubt correct. CRASH IN SMASH!!!! This is the perfect way to end the Fighters Pass so it got to be true!" and then a few days later it turns out that leaker was a complete troll that Sabi kicked out and we got confirmation that Crash wasn't the fifth fighter. Also do I even to bring up how this board reacted to the Lupin Leak?And since you keep bringing up Piranha Plant and the Grinch Leak, talking about how upset over it you still are in all of your posts, let me be the first to break this very imporant fact to you: Nobody cares, Wynn. Nobody. ****ING. CARES. Nobody gives a flying **** that you were burned by believing in the Grinch Leak, because we ALL bought into the Grinch Leak, we were ALL burned like you were, Wynn. But when the dust settled, and the salt finally stopped flowing, we all dusted ourselves off, learned our lesson, and moved on like reasonable adults. We didn't spend a whole goddamn year seething over it like you did, we moved on and looked ahead.
So what, am I suppose to go get some insider knowledge to specifically source on why the rumor is fake? People can just believe it without any real backing but if I want to say it's fake then I got to do all this homework so I can officially debunk it. If I'm going to have to do all this research to debunk a leak then you guys better do some research on why this leak is totally believable.But I guess you just can't accept that, can you? You can't ****ing stand that we're not as cynical and immediately dismissive as you are, and may actually want to have a nice, constructive dialogue about the current rumors and speculation going around. And if that's the case, I can't really stop you from feeling that way, nor can I help you get over these hangups you have. All I ask is that you **** or get off the pot. Either take the time to objectively analyze and debunk these rumors or stop ****ing talking about it, because I think I speak for everyone when I say that we're all sick of your little routine.
>People are discussing a rumor/leak
>You come in with your cynical and typically poorly reasoned/subjective assertions.
>People start to question your arguments and fire back.
>You fold and go "Oh well, I guess I can't convince you guys of anything! Fine, believe what you want to believe, just don't come crying to me when I'm right! LOL!"
>The conversation is dropped for a few days.
>You come back into the discussion like nothing ever happened. Lather, rinse, repeat.
It's old, it's tired, and everyone is sick of it.
This x1000. THREE Link clones is absurd enough as it is considering how many Zelda characters we don't have instead. I think it'd be awesome to have toon link use something like "helm splitter" or the rolling counter move incorporated into his moveset. There's lots of room to change things up on those three.The obvious ones like Ganondorf and Sonic would be nice to be redone, but I would really like to see the all the Link's get overhauled
Adult Link is fun, and the bomb changes do a good job of representing the element of experimentation from BOTW, but man, I would really like to see his kit overhauled completely to match BOTW Link more. I really would've really like to see some his runes play into his moveset more as well as the Champions abilities. And with a new game on the horizon, Link is bound to get some new abilities to his kit. There's just a lot they can do, I wish they leaned into it more
Young Link I wish would've taken more from Majora's Mask. Make him like Pokemon Trainer and have his down B transfer between different mask transformations. That would be extremely fun. If they ever bring back transformation final smashes, use Fierce Dirty for Young Link's
For Toon Link, give him some items from Wind Waker. The Skull Hammer, Korok Leaf, and Grappling Hook. Incorporate that rolling counter attack in some capacity
Each Link can easily be distinct from one another and just be fun to play with. Making them distinct would also better represent Zelda as well
Ew, no. How about this instead?Someone should put on that Tay Swift song “You Need To Calm Down”
But it's not a hard disconfirmation though, all it does is debunk the idea that Mii Hat mods are impossible. It doesn't mean that the hats aren't real, they very well still could be. Also, I don't think the Palutena image from Smash 4 is a good example considering that she did end up making it in.Right now with in a span of a few weeks we're getting mods of very good looking Mallow & Cacodemon Mii Hats with little to no issues in response to trying to disprove the leak. Seeing how Mii Costumes aren't as difficult to make that we thought they were it seems entirely possible that some people are able to make Mii Hats with that type of quality give they had plenty of time. I feel it's safe to just write it off and move on, just like that one Palutena 3DS leak that turned out to be fake.
But all of these points you brought up were just your opinions, though. You said "Actually, I disagree." and people said "I disagree." right back. There's nothing objective with any of these points, either yours or theirs, so this doesn't really apply to anything I've said. It's a false equivalency.There is literally no need to keep any leaks in mind, especially from 4chan. Monkeys and Typewriters. But trying to give arguments here when opposing leaks never works. There's was that one 4chan post that mention Terry & Ryu and everyone was like "yeah that make sense that the last two trailers are continuations of old trailers and that Ryu Hayabusa will take place in Simon's Trailer," but then I come in and say "won't it make sense that Ryu's trailer is actually the opening of the first Ninja Gaiden game with Greninja. I don't think they would have them paired up in Dracula's Castle," but then I get yelled at for being skeptical.
There was the EVO leak where everyone thought that Geno or a character was going to be revealed. I said that Nintendo doesn't usually make characters announcements there, but everyone thought I'm being too negative and saying "Smash is ending the entire thing, of course they have something to show."
I also gave plenty of reasons why any character that is a spirit isn't going to be part of the Fighter Pass, yet everyone disagrees saying I'm too negative. But it looks like I'm right on the money right there.
I gave plenty of reason on why certain things won't happen and try to back it up with what I have I get yelled at because it was deemed to be "negative." Literally the only time I ever got backing from anyone from this board for one of my ideas was saying how Erdrick was owned by three companies so they would've gone with Geno instead, I guess the lesson here is that if you want people to agree with your speculation you need to make it in favor of what they really want to hear.
The lesson to be taken from the Grinch Leak wasn't that we should never discuss the legitimacy of rumors/leaks. The lesson was to not get swept up in conspiracy theories, which was the main point that made the Grinch Leak such a big cluster**** in the first place. And as for the Crash thing, the reason people took that one guy's words into consideration when he was claiming that Crash was coming to Smash is because he had correctly guessed 4 Mii Costumes in a previous post, most significantly the Team Rocket Grunt outfit and the Goemon costume. Does that not give his words a little bit more credence? Can you really blame people for taking his words into consideration when he correctly guessed something as out-there as that?REALLY?! You're trying to legitimately you guys "learn your lesson" from the Grinch Leak when we're still believing in leaks? No, nobody learned anything. We had this entire board go crazy because PapaGenos said that his source from the Mii Hats said Crash was the fifth fighter, remember? Remember how everyone was going on "That one guy who said Ryu Hayabusa was going to be the fighter, TOTALLY DEAD WRONG! CRASH IN SMASH! This one guy that we barely know about who said these Mii Costumes are in is totally without a doubt correct. CRASH IN SMASH!!!! This is the perfect way to end the Fighters Pass so it got to be true!" and then a few days later it turns out that leaker was a complete troll that Sabi kicked out and we got confirmation that Crash wasn't the fifth fighter. Also do I even to bring up how this board reacted to the Lupin Leak?
You guys may not be feeling burned for believing in leaks anymore, but so many of you are still believing it in. You guys haven't learn anything.
You keep repeating that same point even though people have already addressed it. Yes, leaks can be faked no matter how legitimate they look. Do you have any other points to bring up? Perhaps any weird details you've noticed about it that would make--oh, uh, no, you're just saying that it could be faked again. As I've said before, I don't mind you being critical or debunking things, just provide better points.Also another lesson that I need to learn is that I can only mention the stuff that I don't like ONCE. If I mention that I don't like something a couple of times apparently I haven't moved on. Just because you move on or accepted it doesn't mean you can't continue to dislike or hate it! Apparently the only way I can ever convey is to never talk about every again or just come out and I LOVE PIRANHA PLANT, BEST CHARACTER! Only talk about positive things more then once, negativity needs to STFU and isn't allowed ever.
Random 4chan posts are a dime a dozen and most if not all of them are fake. Arguing it's legitimacy would be a case of trying to prove that it's real or worth considering. An image and a duo of high-quality, legitimate-looking videos are very rare and somewhat harder to make. Arguing it's legitimacy would be a case of trying to disprove it's authenticity. You don't need to be an insider to prove or disprove a rumor/leak, all you need is to provide good analysis and solid argumentation.So what, am I suppose to go get some insider knowledge to specifically source on why the rumor is fake? People can just believe it without any real backing but if I want to say it's fake then I got to do all this homework so I can officially debunk it. If I'm going to have to do all this research to debunk a leak then you guys better do some research on why this leak is totally believable.
A question: Do you believe that everyone in this thread that discusses a rumor/leak believes it to be 100% real? Because I sure as hell don't, and I'm not immediately knowledgeable of anyone else who does. From what I've seen, people have tended to fall more on the skeptical side of things, not entirely believing them, but not completely ruling them out, either. I think you may be mistaken as to what people believe and don't believe.You know what's getting tiring? You guys believing a leak, I tell you that it could be fake, I'm called out for not believing it or being too negative, AND 9 TIME OUT OF 10 IT TURNS OUT TO BE FAKE AND THEN THIS BOARD MOVES ON THE NEWEST LEAK!!! The conversations of those leak/rumors didn't drop because people moved on, IT WAS DROPPED BECAUSE IT TURNED OUT TO BE FAKE! I swear, someone can literally sell a bridge coated in snake oil to many members in this board.
I think the main issue is you make blanket statements and generalizations that are patently false. The reason people stop talking about a leak once it's proven false is because there's no more reason to speculate on a dead leak, we move on to the next one because speculating on it helps to break up the monotony between information droughts. People call you out because you tend to get on our case every time we put even a little bit of stock in a leak, and then you're like "woah hold on there, remember last time when X leak happened and everybody (read: one or two people) wouldn't stop complaining? You all need to remember to take these with a grain of salt"You know what's getting tiring? You guys believing a leak, I tell you that it could be fake, I'm called out for not believing it or being too negative, AND 9 TIME OUT OF 10 IT TURNS OUT TO BE FAKE AND THEN THIS BOARD MOVES ON THE NEWEST LEAK!!! The conversations of those leak/rumors didn't drop because people moved on, IT WAS DROPPED BECAUSE IT TURNED OUT TO BE FAKE! I swear, someone can literally sell a bridge coated in snake oil to many members in this board.
I don't think that is how it works.Nintendo didnt tweet anything today. Could it be? A SMASHING announcement incoming for tomorrow? :O
Ness is an OG, I love his standard moveset but the lack of Rockin is a damn shame when it's such a simple thing. Lucas was the perfect opportunity to make a more-canon Mother protagonist in Smash. Project M's Lucas has Offense-up which is just... so ****ing sick. Actually a move he can use and it made your enemy **** their pants when you could hit a charged Dacus.As for Ness and Lucas, they both should've had different final smashes to match with their respected games such as PK Rockin and PK Love. They also needed to get new voice clips i felt upset to see Ness get new voice clips in smash 4 while lucas was giving brawl's clips and now in ultimate they are both recycling voices which still leaves the latter in a sour tone.
Nintendo didnt tweet anything today. Could it be? A SMASHING announcement incoming for tomorrow? :O
I'll do you one better, why is Geno?Everybody is asking when is Geno, but nobody ask how is Geno.
I'll do you one better, WHEN is Geno?I'll do you one better, why is Geno?
I mean I wouldn't be opposed to a bomb dropping rn, but it's just kind of waiting it out for a legit leak.This thread really slowed down, huh? Guess it's alright though, you always need a little r & r. Especially after the multiple rollercoasters we've been on the past week or two. Good to just be chill and calm until we get a new fighter announcement.
NoNintendo didnt tweet anything today. Could it be? A SMASHING announcement incoming for tomorrow? :O
How is that any indication that a Direct will be announcement tomorrow?Nintendo didnt tweet anything today. Could it be? A SMASHING announcement incoming for tomorrow? :O
Watch this be right.Nintendo didnt tweet anything today. Could it be? A SMASHING announcement incoming for tomorrow? :O