I was under the impression that X-2 had a really good battle system, but the rest of the game was so bad that no one played it. Or they played it, and hated themselves.Don't be hatin' on the fanservice! That's the only thing X-2 had going for it!
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I was under the impression that X-2 had a really good battle system, but the rest of the game was so bad that no one played it. Or they played it, and hated themselves.Don't be hatin' on the fanservice! That's the only thing X-2 had going for it!
Wow, you are right. I never noticed that before. Gooooooood callX-2's battle system was basically the predecessor to XIII's. If XIII and X's battle systems had a baby, it'd be X-2.
Rikku. Dat g-string.Well I was like 12 when it came out, so I'm pretty sure I beat off to the game a lot, thus making it good.
Yuna was just too damn cute :3
Hence the hilarityWhy does everyone overlook Brother hitting on Yuna? They're cousins for god's sake!
zippers! Zippers everywhere!he started going way downhill aka kingdom hearts.
Two things:Iunno if Nomura was part of it, but I liked ...well I liked the mainstream numbers. XIII/XII were good. Kingdom Hearts is meh though.
They need to drop the ******** **** like Bahamut's Blood, Dragon Quest, MindJack(lmao?), Dungeon Siege(forgive me, I played II ages ago. It never seemed special..)
Drop the small stuff, focus on the rebirth of oldschool rpgs... Chrono Trigger :[
This. QFT.Two things:
1: Don't go saying that Square needs to drop their "********" IPs, then say that they need to reboot their old franchises while listing Dragon Quest, one of their oldest franchises to date, as one they need to drop.
2: Complaints like this are why Square just continually releases new Final Fantasies that would work well as entirely new IPs without the FF name. Honestly, people ***** about them making nothing but FF but when they try to make new franchises they sell poorly.
Square-Enix would probably do a terrible job on the next Chrono game unless people like Kato and Mitsuda come back just for that one game.Drop the small stuff, focus on the rebirth of oldschool rpgs... Chrono Trigger :[
Yeah, you can. It'll work since you're going to be using it on the same PSN account/PSP.Quick question. Can you transfer DLC and all that from one memory stick to another? Where I work there's 16GB ones on sale until the 17th so I just wanna make sure before that sale ends that when I buy a new one I can carry over my DLC like KH!Cloud and all for Dissidia 012.
What's so good about Dragon Quest though? I'm sorry, but games where the main character's name is hero... x_x.Two things:
1: Don't go saying that Square needs to drop their "********" IPs, then say that they need to reboot their old franchises while listing Dragon Quest, one of their oldest franchises to date, as one they need to drop.
2: Complaints like this are why Square just continually releases new Final Fantasies that would work well as entirely new IPs without the FF name. Honestly, people ***** about them making nothing but FF but when they try to make new franchises they sell poorly.
I've only played VIII, but I was just pointing out that it's ridiculous that you asked them to revival their old IPs while simultaneous asking them to put down one of their most successful and oldest franchises.What's so good about Dragon Quest though? I'm sorry, but games where the main character's name is hero... x_x.
It would be interesting to see Square do more with their older games, I do agree with that.I'm all for creating new IPs, I was just saying I miss old ones.
That's right, there is no such thing as a bigger company publishing a smaller company's game. ALL GAMES WITH THE SQUARE LOGO ON THE BOX ARE MADE BY THEM. NO EXCEPTIONS.I actually didn't mean Blood of Bahamut (I've never played it), I just meant their hack-n-slash genre in general. SE fails at making Hack-n-slashes. (Drakengard/Nier are prime examples...)
I would rather that they just released new games without relying on the FF name.Though it comes off as such, I'm never a fan of them just spitting out FFs and nothing else. I just wish the cutbacks would hurt the things that need to sleep (or die in some cases), than others. If that makes sense.
I've only played VIII, and I really couldn't get into it. So yeah, I have to agree with you that Dragon Quest isn't my cup of tea.Forgive me though, I've never liked Dragon Quest(bar IX). I've played a few of the old ones, VI, and VIII, and I hated them. I really tried to like them, too ;/. IX is fun though, but it seems..different, iunno how to explain it.
Such as? Come on, Square is publishing DEUS EX now. Lets not forget that the Tomb Raider reboot looks to have promise (although that franchise was rendered null and void by Uncharted). Sure, they've published some bad games but stop focusing on the negative and pay attention to what they've done right.Also, it's not our fault 75% of their new IPs are ********.
Square has more IPs than that. Sure, Drakenguard, Nier and Mindjack might have been lackluster but it's not like those are the only IPs Square has aside from FF. And KH defiantly isn't for everyone.-I played Drakengard1/2 and tried Nier, they were terrible.
-My friend had mindjack, meh.
-I've played KH1, 2, and one of the Gba ones, it was.. I'm sorry I didn't like it?
If you liked TWEWY then you should pick up a copy to support non-FF Square games and show them that we're willing to pay for more than just FF.I will say TWEWY looks amazing, I really need to get that, and Drakengard had a decent story. That's really all I can say.
I agree here. Just don't complain about every game that comes out and be thankful that Square is doing more than FF and DQ.I hate the fact they milk FF and DQ badly, but they need to either fix bad IPs, or just let them die and start fresh.
The only hack and slashes Square published was the two Drakenguards and Nier. Plus the Bouncer but I've heard that game was just forgettable, not really bad. But that's only four games compared to the stupid amount of RPGs they've made.[/QUOTE]Also, on an ending note, drop=sleep not end. I would love to see Dragon Quest thrive...later. (I wish they'd quit making hack-n-slash games though)
[/QUOTE]I've only played VIII, but I was just pointing out that it's ridiculous that you asked them to revival their old IPs while simultaneous asking them to put down one of their most successful and oldest franchises.
It would be interesting to see Square do more with their older games, I do agree with that.
That's right, there is no such thing as a bigger company publishing a smaller company's game. ALL GAMES WITH THE SQUARE LOGO ON THE BOX ARE MADE BY THEM. NO EXCEPTIONS.
Sarcasm aside, I've never played either so it's not my place to judge. Although it is interesting to know that Drakenguard and Nier where both developed by the same company. Also, don't go hating on a game you haven't played.
I would rather that they just released new games without relying on the FF name.
I've only played VIII, and I really couldn't get into it. So yeah, I have to agree with you that Dragon Quest isn't my cup of tea.
Such as? Come on, Square is publishing DEUS EX now. Lets not forget that the Tomb Raider reboot looks to have promise (although that franchise was rendered null and void by Uncharted). Sure, they've published some bad games but stop focusing on the negative and pay attention to what they've done right.
Square has more IPs than that. Sure, Drakenguard, Nier and Mindjack might have been lackluster but it's not like those are the only IPs Square has aside from FF. And KH defiantly isn't for everyone.
If you liked TWEWY then you should pick up a copy to support non-FF Square games and show them that we're willing to pay for more than just FF.
I agree here. Just don't complain about every game that comes out and be thankful that Square is doing more than FF and DQ.
The only hack and slashes Square published was the two Drakenguards and Nier. Plus the Bouncer but I've heard that game was just forgettable, not really bad. But that's only four games compared to the stupid amount of RPGs they've made.
The main characters' name in DQ is not "Hero"...What's so good about Dragon Quest though? I'm sorry, but games where the main character's name is hero... x_x.
I haven't played TWEWY yet either. My friend's girlfriend loves the game and I'll probably end up borrowing it from her at some point.-I plan on getting TWENY, work sucks bro.
I don't know anything about it. So really don't have any thoughts on it.-Blood of Bahamut was a hack-slash no?
Publishers can have some influence the process, but usually they'll just ask the team to make some minor tweaks before releasing it. Plus Square didn't pick up the dungeon siege rights until recently (like, only last year recently). And everything Obsidian touches turns into a buggy mess that is hardly worth your time anyway.-I know they don't create every game that has the logo on it, but I thought SE had a lot to do with Dungeon Siege, no? Or maybe Obsidian is doing most of it, hell I just could've sworn I read they had a lot to do with it...
Well, its better to show them that **** outside of FFs sells, then.I am grateful they do non-jrpgs, but I'm not going to support crap either. I plan to buy TWEWY, it is a gem, but things like Drakengard...(and Nier) are...-sigh-.
SE has a bad habit of doing that, especially to their western fans. Square's biggest problem is that they're only interesting in appealing to their Japanese fans. Their Japanese fans eat up Final Fantasies and whenever a Dragon Quest is released its practically a national Holiday over there (or so I've heard). That's why they're failing. They still think that its 2003 and the Final Fantasy name alone is enough to make one of their games a massive hit and they also seem to think that the Square name holds a ton of weight to it still. All they do is focus on their homeland while any vague attempts to appeal to a western fanbase falls flat on its face (by Deus Ex 3 does look ****ing fantastic).@Final Ark:
The problem is SE doesn't listen. One time I wrote them a suggestion email for FFXI. (They took suggestions, btw). They very mature-like told me to stfu and mind my own business, it was their game.
That would be fantastic, but again, they only care about their Japanese fans who eat up FF and DQ like no tomorrow.This is why so much of their new stuff fails. If they let FF and DQ sleep for a while and made fresh IPs that were different and great, plus maybe revive some older ones, I'd be all for that. (Sorry for run-on sentence)
Really? Hm... I actually thought all Square's been doing was trying to appeal to its Western fanbase instead of the opposite with games like Nier and such.SE has a bad habit of doing that, especially to their western fans. Square's biggest problem is that they're only interesting in appealing to their Japanese fans. Their Japanese fans eat up Final Fantasies and whenever a Dragon Quest is released its practically a national Holiday over there (or so I've heard). That's why they're failing. They still think that its 2003 and the Final Fantasy name alone is enough to make one of their games a massive hit and they also seem to think that the Square name holds a ton of weight to it still. All they do is focus on their homeland while any vague attempts to appeal to a western fanbase falls flat on its face (by Deus Ex 3 does look ****ing fantastic).
That would be fantastic, but again, they only care about their Japanese fans who eat up FF and DQ like no tomorrow.