It depends alot on how much you think we have to gain from banning MK, and if it equals out the consequences of doing so.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Maybe... but this is not normal and he is probably the better player.Peach can't do that with MK? Oh boy, you need to see djudjo, a brazilian peach player. He eat MKs in the breakfast.
He can camp almost equally with MK. If they go hand to hand, snake can only hope that his ftilts hit.That's the problem with Snakes =\ But he can fight almost equally against MKs. Not get gimped/early killed is the key. And that depends on your mind.
It is to a campy MK.Missing Wario's fart depends on your mind game. And it's not THAT hard give 60% dmg to MKs.
MK can punish that move with literally every attack he has if it fails; usually it leads to a lot of pain.Oh yeah ._.' sorry, Marth is outranged... But he can do %s on MKs with side Bs, upb out of the shield (risky) and a fsmash sweetspoted kills MK with 40%+-. Depends.
Simple-he either lacked the knowledge for the matchup (Lain at APEX) or was beaten by the better (or luckier, read it as you will) player (Ally at APEX). It doesn't mean his char is any worse. It means he as a person failed.But the main point of the post is to say that things don't go like combo videos, it depends on the mind... Or how do you explain m2k get beaten?
but yes needs 2/3 majority. and from how it's looking, he won't get banned.lol i voted no and it looks
like yes is winning =(
get *****
That's partly what I was thinking. I don't think we have enough to gain from a MK-less community to justify that.By the way.
I want to state that this whole Meta Knight ban-issue hurts the community a lot.
He is a nuisance to many, but it would hurt the community. I think if Meta Knight gets banned, a lot of Meta Knight players would simply quit the game and play something else. That means that we'd lose quite a lot of players, not only on Top level (Mew2King), but also throughout high and mid level play.
Furthermore, I think that many players of other characters are exaggerating their matchups against Meta Knight in order to have him banned faster, since - while not being a horrible one to most of the cast - he still gives them a slight disadvantage. With one disadvantage and the best character gone, these characters' players think they will magically do better at tournaments, while not keeping in mind that the characters that give them more problems will definitely see an increase from the Meta Knight players that stay in the game. The community has been so clenching onto the chance of Meta Knight being banned that I don't think that many things have been evaluated rationally.
In conclusion, while I do think Meta Knight's presence hurts the community as a whole, this is only due to the whole ban-talk.
Again, missed point. If I could take vids I would-then you could see the difference. I think this isn't worth arguing further then...First, Luigi just has a straight out bad matchup with mk. And the friend swiching from toon link to mk was being smart. That was just him counterpicking wisely. (didn't put him at an advantage or you at a disadvantage, but it went from 60:40 to around 50:50). And i saw fun in your arguement, but someone already went on about that so yeah.
...why are u guys banning mk god **** dam
IS HE THAT BAD
that little *** didnt even win genesis
U GUYS ARE ALL GAY and when i c mk banned ima laughed
cause it just backs up everything i ever thought about the brawl
community ... SCARED LITTLE FELLAS ..... ill be playing melee ... where
characters ****.. AND WE DEAL WITH IT and we **** them
ps. ima puff player ...
also pink mk ***** ..
This is a **** good post. That and Spadefox's. I still think more is gained by banning though.It depends alot on how much you think we have to gain from banning MK, and if it equals out the consequences of doing so.
I am holding you to it. As best as someone across the country can. lulzraaaape
i think its time i play brawl
and wip out that puff
lol
Having MK in the game also hurts the community in a different point of view. What makes it so certain that people wouldn't drop the game because MK is unbalancing it? Tbh, The talk about people who are top players quitting because MK is banned is kind of iirelivent. I know some people who voted no just because of that reason, and I am like lolwat? trying to keep the community together is one thing, but we have an issue at hand that just doesn't involve what the top players think or feel about it. It is for the community as a whole. As of right now, there are a little bit more people who are complaining about MK then trying to save him.By the way.
I want to state that this whole Meta Knight ban-issue hurts the community a lot.
He is a nuisance to many, but it would hurt the community. I think if Meta Knight gets banned, a lot of Meta Knight players would simply quit the game and play something else. That means that we'd lose quite a lot of players, not only on Top level (Mew2King), but also throughout high and mid level play.
Not to mention we're all going to evolve into suck if he's banned.By the way.
I want to state that this whole Meta Knight ban-issue hurts the community a lot.
He is a nuisance to many, but it would hurt the community. I think if Meta Knight gets banned, a lot of Meta Knight players would simply quit the game and play something else. That means that we'd lose quite a lot of players, not only on Top level (Mew2King), but also throughout high and mid level play.
Furthermore, I think that many players of other characters are exaggerating their matchups against Meta Knight in order to have him banned faster, since - while not being a horrible one to most of the cast - he still gives them a slight disadvantage. With one disadvantage and the best character gone, these characters' players think they will magically do better at tournaments, while not keeping in mind that the characters that give them more problems will definitely see an increase from the Meta Knight players that stay in the game. The community has been so clenching onto the chance of Meta Knight being banned that I don't think that many things have been evaluated rationally.
In conclusion, while I do think Meta Knight's presence hurts the community as a whole, this is only due to the whole ban-talk.
Play brawl I'll cut your throat.i would play brawl.. but everyone is trying 2 ban mk
so when i start ****** with puff there just gonna wanna ban her
lol
and wtf is a headdesk
did ur head hit the desk? lol
Nobody is gonna take you serious with that Milhouse avatar! Seriously, watch some mahvel people!Play brawl I'll cut your throat.
Who the **** cares what character someone plays? MKs want MK banned, MKs don't want him banned, non-MKs want him banned, non-MKs don't want him banned, some people don't care, some people don't know, etc. Don't be stupid.Oh wait, you main mario? Yeah go ahead and quit if he gets banned![]()
Milhouse is a deadly ****ing murderer.Nobody is gonna take you serious with that Milhouse avatar! Seriously, watch some mahvel people!
They don't matter. They'd just as soon whine about Pit ledgecamping them or Snake spamming spotdodge -> Utilt when they're at 100+ percent.Having MK in the game also hurts the community in a different point of view. What makes it so certain that people wouldn't drop the game because MK is unbalancing it? Tbh, The talk about people who are top players quitting because MK is banned is kind of iirelivent. I know some people who voted no just because of that reason, and I am like lolwat? trying to keep the community together is one thing, but we have an issue at hand that just doesn't involve what the top players think or feel about it. It is for the community as a whole. As of right now, there are a little bit more people who are complaining about MK then trying to save him.
Matador, that may be a bit harsh, but this is why M2K hates the community.
'OH BUT HE MAINS MK'
/sigh
Oh wait, you main mario? Yeah go ahead and quit if he gets banned![]()
If you would've read my post, you would've seen that I didn't say only Top players would quit.Having MK in the game also hurts the community in a different point of view. What makes it so certain that people wouldn't drop the game because MK is unbalancing it? Tbh, The talk about people who are top players quitting because MK is banned is kind of iirelivent. I know some people who voted no just because of that reason, and I am like lolwat? trying to keep the community together is one thing, but we have an issue at hand that just doesn't involve what the top players think or feel about it. It is for the community as a whole. As of right now, there are a little bit more people who are complaining about MK then trying to save him.
Awwwww! Closed within minutes! I'm willing to bet that half the people that voted on the poll don't even go to tournies!
Or because they can't get around Jin's ice car.
Or because Tetris keeps giving them L's.
Aww too bad it was closed....The anti-ban's argument was very convincing...
That's making a rather large assumption especially considering the characters you used in your admittedly arbitrary example. We regularly practice against a pit and a snake and it's still easy to see MK is broken beyond that. Would we quit? Well I did but it wasnt MK related, but he is unfortunately the poster child of what a lot of people consider "everything wrong with brawl".They don't matter. They'd just as soon whine about Pit ledgecamping them or Snake spamming spotdodge -> Utilt when they're at 100+ percent.
That's WAAAY too simple. Sagat in SF4 doesn't even have a 4:6 and he's FAR from broken. Don't tell me you want him banned too?That's making a rather large assumption especially considering the characters you used in your admittedly arbitrary example. We regularly practice against a pit and a snake and it's still easy to see MK is broken beyond that. Would we quit? Well I did but it wasnt MK related, but he is unfortunately the poster child of what a lot of people consider "everything wrong with brawl".
I'm leaving my reasoning simple though.
"Can the character be put into a reasonable 4:6 situation"
"No"
"Ban"
Don't play SF4 so I don't care. If I were to look into tourney results etc it's possible but not likely. It's a rather good coincidence that the best players don't often play sagat. Nevermind the fact that what, 2 characters in SF are banned? One for a unique ability (kind of like flight with a reward for being hit out of it) and the other for being rather blatantly broken?That's WAAAY too simple. Sagat in SF4 doesn't even have a 4:6 and he's FAR from broken. Don't tell me you want him banned too?
Please god this. Comparing smash to existing fighters DOES NOT WORK.Can a moderator officially ban the argument about comparing the validity of characters in other games with brawl?
It's not working.
Especially for melee.