momochuu
Smash Legend
- Joined
- May 8, 2008
- Messages
- 12,868
- NNID
- Momochuu
- 3DS FC
- 2380-3247-9039
Yeah, I've never heard of that. Does anyone have a video?Could someone please post a video of EDC or something? I really need to see it...
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Yeah, I've never heard of that. Does anyone have a video?Could someone please post a video of EDC or something? I really need to see it...
Honest to God, shut up... The anti-ban side has just as many people who simply spout things off from rote too. If you're going to stay in this thread simply to chastise people for not sharing your beliefs and circle jerk those that do then just leave.no thats not even close. your kind is the reason pro ban is always higher numbers
you cant explain why you think that way either
Meta Knight: (1st: 4, 2nd: 6, 3rd: 3, 4th: 3, 5th: 3, 7th: 5, 1st*: 1, 2nd*: 1, 3rd*: 4, 4th*: 5, 5th*: 4, 7th*: 2)
Snake: (1st: 4, 2nd: 2, 4th: 1, 5th: 2, 7th: 2, 1st*: 2, 3rd*: 2, 4th*: 2)
Diddy Kong: (1st: 1, 2nd: 1, 3rd: 1, 5th: 3, 7th: 3, 4th*: 1, 5th*: 1, 7th*: 1)
Mr. Game & Watch: (1st: 1, 2nd: 1, 4th: 1, 5th: 1, 7th: 1)
King Dedede: (1st: 1, 4th: 1, 5th: 4, 7th: 1, 2nd*: 2, 3rd*: 3, 7th*: 1)
Zero Suit Samus: (1st: 1, 5th: 1, 7th: 2, 3rd*: 1, 5th: 1)
Lucario: (1st: 1, 5th: 1, 3rd*: 1, 4th*: 1, 5th*: 3)
Falco: (2nd: 1, 5th: 2, 7th: 1, 3rd*: 1 4th*: 1, 5th*: 2, 7th*: 1)
Wario: (2nd: 1, 5th: 1, 7th: 2, 1st*: 1, 2nd*: 1, 3rd*: 2, 4th*: 1, 7th*: 1)
Pikachu: (2nd: 1, 7th: 2, 4th*: 1)
Luigi: (2nd: 1, 7th: 1)
R.O.B.: (3rd: 1, 4th*: 1, 5th*: 1, 7th*: 1)
Sonic: (4th: 1, 7th: 2, 7th*: 1)
Lucas: (4th: 1, 3rd*: 1)
Donkey Kong: (4th: 1, 7th*: 1)
Samus: (4th: 1)
Marth: (5th: 2, 7th: 1, 1st*: 1, 3rd*: 2)
Pit: (5th: 1, 4th*: 1)
Toon Link: (5th: 1)
Ness: (5th: 1)
Kirby: (7th: 1)
Ice Climbers: (1st*: 1, 3rd*: 2, 4th*: 1, 7th*: 3)
Zelda & Sheik: (3rd*: 1)
Pokemon Trainer: (3rd*: 1)
Peach: (3rd*: 1)
Wolf: (5th*: 1)
Fox: (7th*: 1)
When staying home with a sick nine-year old, there's not much you can do.Lol do some of you people actually enjoy sitting in here all day? I swear I've made multiple visits throughout the day and I see the same people from like...noon yesterday. xD
Sheesh...
Are you seriously going to try to argue the slippery slope?how long until everyone wants to ban ice climbers?
edit: king beef, LOLOLOL. i know. its pathetic
It's less an argument of slippery slope and more an argument concerning how scrubby the mentality behind this is. That said, it's not hard to imagine that jump in logic, and "Slippery Slope" is defined as a potential fallacy and not a definite one.Are you seriously going to try to argue the slippery slope?
*Really wishes I could BAN people who try to bring up that argument, I swear to ****ing god*
Nice counter-argument, there.........i dont care?
jeez dog chill you shouldn't rage off orion's statement XDAre you seriously going to try to argue the slippery slope?
*Really wishes I could BAN people who try to bring up that argument, I swear to ****ing god*
I know some intelligent anti-bans are posting, anyone got an answer for why MK's recently used tricks to successfully bypass rules aren't reason enough to ban him on their own merit?I was always told that the IDC was banned (Rather than MK being banned) because it was so easily identifiable.
With mini-IDC's slipping in and the EDC now showing up, not to mention the whole trouble with planking MK causes, what part of "no longer easily identifiable" means MK shouldn't be banned solely because the rules can't be reliably enforced against a skilled player using him?
........i dont care?
Reading him again he was just pointing out the scrubiness of the community.jeez dog chill you shouldn't rage off orion's statement XD
There should be more people like AMazing Ampharos hes too good at this data stuff =D
You came into the Ban Metaknight Debate my friendReading him again he was just pointing out the scrubiness of the community.
My point still stands.
because not all meta knights do this and the ones who do are treated like trash. Not like most Meta knight mains aren't already insulted enough for using a top tier, omgbroken character etc.I know some intelligent anti-bans are posting, anyone got an answer for why MK's recently used tricks to successfully bypass rules aren't reason enough to ban him on their own merit?
You really can't do that, sorry. =)they should ban playing gay
When somebody can prove that EDC has been used to gamebreaking effect consistently, it's bannable on its own merit.I know some intelligent anti-bans are posting, anyone got an answer for why MK's recently used tricks to successfully bypass rules aren't reason enough to ban him on their own merit?
Worth a try right? XDYou really can't do that, sorry. =)
Editz: lol @ above
don't mind him, he's just here because we permabanned him from trolling AiBno thats not even close. your kind is the reason pro ban is always higher numbers
you cant explain why you think that way either
This deals with the EDC only, and assumes it isn't something that needs restricting (Which means it's a wash, because you can't prove that it's not a problem either).When somebody can prove that EDC has been used to gamebreaking effect consistently, it's bannable on its own merit.
Unfortunately, theory and reality are not the same and conjecture cannot be used as a basis for bans.
How would you ban it?Worth a try right? XD
I can't very easily debate this when I've never heard of an instance of this happening or, rather, seen proof of this happening. I'll leave it to somebody who has, in that case. It's a rather moot point otherwise, because all I've seen is theory that he can rather than evidence that he has.This deals with the EDC only, and assumes it isn't something that needs restricting (Which means it's a wash, because you can't prove that it's not a problem either).
MK bypassing rules specifically aimed to restrict planking while still successfully planking and sneaking in mini-IDC's when they're illegal has not been addressed, nor has a reasonable enforcement against it been proposed.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=th34fKU2jVA&feature=relatedYeah, I've never heard of that. Does anyone have a video?
MK bypassing rules specifically aimed to restrict planking while still successfully planking and sneaking in mini-IDC's when they're illegal has not been addressed, nor has a reasonable enforcement against it been proposed.
That's IDC, lol. Thanks for not making me feel invisible though. xD
I think that's completely different.
Ah so you're just trolling then Stingers, ok.i only posted the 2 ppl that cried the most in the "it's hopeless" thread. CALM DOWN dude
Took you 70 pages to figure that out? Step yo' game up HugS. *I use 40 post per pages because I'm not a silly manAh so you're just trolling then Stingers, ok.
This is the part that terrifies me, because it probably will, and honestly, I've invested a lot of time in this community, made a ton of friends, etc, which is why I'm willing to sit at this thread all day in an attempt to make sure that it doesn't happen.MK ban should happen.
It will destroy the brawl community.
Everyone knows it.
Okay, my memory was faulty - I don't have a direct name, I have someone who says video evidence exists. Presumably he can provide it. I will quote him for reference:I can't very easily debate this when I've never heard of an instance of this happening or, rather, seen proof of this happening. I'll leave it to somebody who has, in that case. It's a rather moot point otherwise, because all I've seen is theory that he can rather than evidence that he has.
So assuming Praxis is truthful (Do you have reason to doubt him?) MK in the hands of a skilled player can simply bypass bans on his IDC by only using it occasionally, at moments of extreme need, and be effectively unpunishable.A popular tactic for MetaKnight is the Infinite Dimensional Cape. This tactic, which makes MetaKnight both invincible and invisible (obviously making it so he is not effected by the normal aspects of the game) was promptly banned, but it has proven to not be enough. There has been video evidence of players using even just a little bit of IDC to escape certain situations, enough to where it would be tough to call out at the time of the match, but enough to make a judgement based on a video review. Despite the tactic being banned, players (including Mew2King) have managed to slip by with using it without any repercussion.
Actually... this kind of points out the opposite. For starters, this shows that Metaknight leaves just about everyone in the dust and has more than double the placings of the second place character when you add up the totals, Snake. Second, look at all who the characters are who have won. Aside from Lucario (who was probably Azen who quit Brawl earlier this year), the other characters who won a major tournament are the closest things that Metaknight has to counters or are already very high ranking (King Dedede and Game and Watch) and even then it was only one win from each of them except Snake. With this being said, it further highlights that in higher levels of competition, you are pretty much forced to beat a high ranking Metaknight in order to win a major tournament. As other people have said, you basically have a game that's centralized around beating one character at the moment. As argued before, Snake owes a decent amount of his success to Metaknight and being the character that goes the closest with him.I updated some old data of mine with modern results. These are the full performances of major tournaments (90+ entrees, and yes this does exclude several tournaments that would have made these numbers look more in my favor so it's not a carefully selected number) in the year 2009 so far of all characters for top 8. The only updates I turned out having to make were factoring in APEX and Genesis which didn't change much actually (mostly giving Snake two more wins), but they're factored in. Note that placements with an asterisk (*) next to them are placements for which the character did not do it alone; these are substantially less interesting than placements for which the character did do it alone.
Seven different characters have won major tournaments this year completely by themselves. These would be Meta Knight, Snake, Diddy Kong, Mr. Game & Watch, King Dedede, Zero Suit Samus, and Lucario.Code:Meta Knight: (1st: 4, 2nd: 6, 3rd: 3, 4th: 3, 5th: 3, 7th: 5, 1st*: 1, 2nd*: 1, 3rd*: 4, 4th*: 5, 5th*: 4, 7th*: 2) Snake: (1st: 4, 2nd: 2, 4th: 1, 5th: 2, 7th: 2, 1st*: 2, 3rd*: 2, 4th*: 2) Diddy Kong: (1st: 1, 2nd: 1, 3rd: 1, 5th: 3, 7th: 3, 4th*: 1, 5th*: 1, 7th*: 1) Mr. Game & Watch: (1st: 1, 2nd: 1, 4th: 1, 5th: 1, 7th: 1) King Dedede: (1st: 1, 4th: 1, 5th: 4, 7th: 1, 2nd*: 2, 3rd*: 3, 7th*: 1) Zero Suit Samus: (1st: 1, 5th: 1, 7th: 2, 3rd*: 1, 5th: 1) Lucario: (1st: 1, 5th: 1, 3rd*: 1, 4th*: 1, 5th*: 3) Falco: (2nd: 1, 5th: 2, 7th: 1, 3rd*: 1 4th*: 1, 5th*: 2, 7th*: 1) Wario: (2nd: 1, 5th: 1, 7th: 2, 1st*: 1, 2nd*: 1, 3rd*: 2, 4th*: 1, 7th*: 1) Pikachu: (2nd: 1, 7th: 2, 4th*: 1) Luigi: (2nd: 1, 7th: 1) R.O.B.: (3rd: 1, 4th*: 1, 5th*: 1, 7th*: 1) Sonic: (4th: 1, 7th: 2, 7th*: 1) Lucas: (4th: 1, 3rd*: 1) Donkey Kong: (4th: 1, 7th*: 1) Samus: (4th: 1) Marth: (5th: 2, 7th: 1, 1st*: 1, 3rd*: 2) Pit: (5th: 1, 4th*: 1) Toon Link: (5th: 1) Ness: (5th: 1) Kirby: (7th: 1) Ice Climbers: (1st*: 1, 3rd*: 2, 4th*: 1, 7th*: 3) Zelda & Sheik: (3rd*: 1) Pokemon Trainer: (3rd*: 1) Peach: (3rd*: 1) Wolf: (5th*: 1) Fox: (7th*: 1)
Twenty-one characters have gotten top 8 at major tournaments by themselves. Getting top 8 at a major tournament even just once is a big deal; these characters are clearly capable if they are able to do this well even sometimes. I suggest it improbable that any of these characters are truly inviable.
That number grows to twenty-seven if you factor in characters that only got top 8 as a part of a strategy that involved multiple characters. That's 3/4 of the cast! Very oddly, Olimar is one of the characters not included...
Snake and Meta Knight have very close performances at this level with each having won four major tournaments by themselves this year. Meta Knight has more overall placements by a noticeable margin, but Snake does have a lead in the 1st* category meaning that it's actually somewhat accurate to claim that Snake is more of a major tournament winner than Meta Knight so far this year. In any case, these two are clearly the most successful characters of the year so far, though they are far from shutting out the rest of the cast.
Looking at the sheer number of characters who have been proven to be able to succeed in major tournaments, I find it really, really hard to see Meta Knight as restricting this game's diversity very much.
Snake has bad matchups, people would learn to fight him.let's ban MK and let snake dominate instead. cool!!!