Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
It's okay Gord, no worries.Request replacement, or well, Gordito's /out of Leopard Skin Taser.
I really do hate doing this type of stuff, and call people out for "not making the commitment bla bla bla", but :/... Sorry![]()
J: He also comes in simply asking questions, but I think that's just how he normally plays when nothing really is going on. He's being very hardheaded wrt Dad's posts. He doesn't seem to get his logic. Not a scum tell, but interesting. His votes have pretty good logic behind them. I don’t know if I completely agree, but, at the moment, he’s not just looking for silly reasons. I dislike, though, that he assumes that, since people have the same reads as him, they have to be town. Town.
The analysis of J talks about him being hardheaded wrt to Dad's posts. Honestly I just found this to be a strange way to explain the interaction, because I think that since you say that Dad's play style is scummy asking some questions and challenging Dad on their reads is a good thing.Kuz/Soup: He's just walking around in circles and I think that's just the hydra in general. But, he seems pretty town to me. But, he's attacking LST because he seems scummy, mostly because of one post where he pretty much just talks. To use Dad's words "all huff and puff and no action." He seems to be working, albeit in a slightly confusing manner. Town.
The read on Hilt seems very weak as well, and the main reason Sang lists for suspicions of Hilt are that he's not very proactive, "pushy" and "confused". I remember Hilt saying early on that he doesn't post much though, so I don't think him being responsive as long as he provides reads and scumhunting when he responds should really be held against him. Another thing is that the accusations of pushy and confused don't really get explained, along with #157 which makes this read feel forced.Hilt: Hilt seems to be very pushy and confused. Post #157 seems... off to me though. Not sure why. But, he doesn't seem very pro-active in the game. I would be hard-pressed to find a post in which he did something for his own reasons, not because somebody asked him something. That is, up until around #241. But, still, it doesn't really seem to be taking any incentive. His long list makes me think he might possibly be town, but I'm not sure. His #275 makes me feel even better. Null leaning scum because of his previous inactivity and requiring people attacking him to really start working.
Then these two reads...the result almost seems flipped. You really breeze through the analysis of RR, and you even present a little good and bad with RR saying his back and forth with J made you feel marginally better. Even if it only makes you feel marginally better, that's a lot better than it seems for Acrostic. This attack is full on with accusations of being overdefensive, wagon jumper, fluff,digging...but in the end RR's read is scum and Acrostic's is null leaning scum, doesn't seem right to me. And then followed by the RR vote, it just seems like taking the safe choice instead of being a little more risky and placing a vote on Acrostic.Red Ryu: Attacking inactives seems to have been all he has done, and it's weird. His back and forth with J (around like 270) makes me feel only marginally better about him, but I'm still nervous around anyone that wants to lynch inactives just because they're inactive. His posts are so short and mostly all have only like, at most, 2 lines of content in them. It's mostly all quotes. Faking content? He doesn’t give much information on his thoughts and yet expects a lot from others. Scum.
Acrostic: He makes a mistake calling the mod-confirmed a mafia, and he gets attacked for it, but it seems just like a newbie mistake being as he's a newbie. His vote on Seph seems RVS to me. He's being overdefensive for reasons he doesn't need to be (97/98), and I don’t understand it. I kind of like his 107 though. His #190 just makes him seem like a major wagon-jumper. I don't like it. His long posts are weird and contain mostly fluff. And by “fluff” I mean the stuff you put in an essay to make it seem like you’re actually doing work. It's... hard to read sometimes. I don't understand his #349 against Dad though. It was based on time restraints and we all get busy sometime. It's not a legitimate reason to me. Digging? Maybe. Null leaning scum.
This is right after the accusation of Dad lying that was shown to be a false accusation. This vote on RR seems extremely convenient after that attempt to cast suspicion on Dad failed, but even more sketchy is Acrostic's reason to vote RR which he redirects to his #372:Alright thanks. Sorry for the misunderstanding. Herp. Putting RR at L-2. Reason is on #372.
Unvote, Vote: Red Ryu
This post is mostly about Dad, and about not being a wagon hopper. The point about RR honestly didn't stand out upon my first read of it and this post shows a very weak intention to lynch RR until it becomes a necessity when the Dad point falls through.@Tom: What are your reads for today and who do you want lynched?
@RR: RR an explanation to why you decided to transition from me to Seikend would be nice. When I asked you to come at me, I wanted you to come at me so I could see you scumhunting and being pro-town before we decided to lynch. Bleck.
@Sangfroid:
Being agitated =/= being over defensive.
There was no wagon to jump-on. Therefore I cannot be a wagon-jumper. Was I trying to get votes on LST? Yes. And it was because there was little to no content from that slot.
He writes too much. Y/N?
Are you serious? Dad lied. No one commented on it. J gave it a complete pass. If someone lies then town should be curious about the intent. It's not based on time restraints. It's based on why Dad would lie in the first place when it was something as trivial as a hydra disagreement. It was not based on time restraints. Re-read and reassess.
This is so scummy. Acrostic makes sure that he is on the RR wagon, but he expresses doubts about it and really rides the middle with his opinion on RR, saying he doesn't feel fantastic about RR but it's better than a NL. This is a really easy way to distance himself from RR while still accounting for his hop on the wagon by explaining it's better than a mislynch. Definitely need to look into Acrostic on a RR scum flip, still on a RR town flip but I think from this RR/Acrostic scum team is likely.That seems to be the general consensus on me this game. I didn't have a strong scum read aside from Dad when I did a re-read. I don't feel fantastic about RR either. But I think an RR lynch today is better than having a possible NL. I also think that pushing the lynch early is a better choice than scrambling at the last minute in case something happens. In other words, I don't feel strongly about RR being scum, but at the same time I don't feel like he's bled town with recent material or persuaded me on why I shouldn't vote him. All I see is him deciding to center his vote from me to Seikend.
No, and I do not want to see Sang lynched toDay, I think her posts have improved since her intro post. She's deff one to keep an eye on, but toDay absolutely has to be between RR/Acrostic/Seikend.Seik wagon, would you move to RR? Would you to stop a NL?
LST, being realistic, do you think Sang's going to get lynched toDay?
Correct me if I'm wrong but I saw no hint that you wanted to lynch AM before this. What are your reasons for supporting an AM lynch?Even though this factor offers no good solutions, I still feel still feel it suffers from benign confusion. And despite this rather impasse conclusion, I feel that his lynch will clear up some pollution.
This is such a terrible answer to this question and then at the end you throw it back on J as if he was in the wrong for asking your opinion on players. It's like you are purposely being shifty about your reads.Different, Weird, Lazy. You sure do ask a lot of questions that tend to go nowhere.
Acrostic's reasoning for voting RR is awful, he says that he is okay with lynching RR even though he thinks he's town because if not he'll be a mislynch for scum to push later on...I have heard this reasoning before and I hate it and I don't think it does any good to lynch someone you think will flip town just so it doesn't happen later in the game, its counter-intuitive to scumhunting.@Everyone: Can you please comment on what you think of Acro's reasoning to vote RR? Do you agree with my 553?
![]()
First things first, if you are gonna call someone else weird you shouldn't be surprised when you get called weird right back (that just peeved me).I'm not weird at all. Why is RR asking you to comment on his reads if he knows that you are reading wrong? This makes even less sense from a null-town perspective because he seems to imply that he genuinely wants feedback from someone who wrongly has a scum read (on him). If he thought you were scum or null-scum then at least he could try to find out who your partners might be from your response.
I already have. You've already commented on how you think it is scummy. I have stated that RR's play is anti-town with his unexplained vote switched and poor rebuttals. I know you know that I've already gone over this. Despite this my gut read is that RR is still town because no one is really coming to help him out (scum-mates) and he just seems so lost this entire game. However his play is still fundamentally anti-town and I would prefer if we lynch him today rather than have him as a questionable read or a possible push at a later point in this game.
This doesn't feel genuine to me at all, not going to save you from a lynch.Did he hammer me?
Cause I was town and wasn't lying.
Are you sure an Acrostic lynch can't happen? He's so scummyHaha same, okay but speaking of which just saw the clock and it's 1:11 so that leaves 23 hours.
Unvote
Vote: Red Ryu
Can't swing Acro lynch in this time.
Btw Sang, you have been here this entire time on the J vs. Acro debate. What did you gain from that and what is your new found read on Acro based on it?
It was. I have never played an online game against J before so all I have to go off of is his IRL play style.As for the last line of the J analysis, I deff know from playing with J before that J doesn't assume same reads = town, so that definitely had to be misconstrued or misunderstood.
I missed a lot during my first read, such as a few things that people had done as well as where Hilt said he doesn't post much. I agree with the last statement as well. I'm not sure if I said that before but I'm saying it now.The read on Hilt seems very weak as well, and the main reason Sang lists for suspicions of Hilt are that he's not very proactive, "pushy" and "confused". I remember Hilt saying early on that he doesn't post much though, so I don't think him being responsive as long as he provides reads and scumhunting when he responds should really be held against him.
I've played with Acro before in Newbie 13 extensively. I played with RR a tiny bit in Newbie where he was claimed cop. At that point, Acro's posts seemed more like nothings but it still seemed to me like he was hunting. RR, on the other hand, just seemed to be trying to bail himself out and trying to get rid of inactives.Then these two reads...the result almost seems flipped. You really breeze through the analysis of RR, and you even present a little good and bad with RR saying his back and forth with J made you feel marginally better. Even if it only makes you feel marginally better, that's a lot better than it seems for Acrostic. This attack is full on with accusations of being overdefensive, wagon jumper, fluff,digging...but in the end RR's read is scum and Acrostic's is null leaning scum, doesn't seem right to me. And then followed by the RR vote, it just seems like taking the safe choice instead of being a little more risky and placing a vote on Acrostic.
I'd prefer Dad|July if I was picking out of players who have been semi-active. If I had a full lynch choice then I'd go with Sephiroth Masamune. Considering the difficulties in completing this wagon, I don't believe that I'm a "viable option," however if I'm not night killed then tomorrow I'm probably going to be tunneled non-stop.So, if you feel that the lynch is bad, who do you think we should lynch? Because you're the only other viable option that people would be willing to lynch.
The lynch wouldn't materialize and there won't be sufficient pressure on either of them to give me substantial responses. I did vote them before throughout the course of today, but I think LST ignored my question wrt Ignatius and changed his fos so I didn't press on it & Dad's been Dad.And why isn't your vote on that person?
My reason for Dad being scum ended up being a misunderstanding on re-read. Therefore I dropped the point after J pointed it out to me. It is not a matter of convenience. That was my lead on Dad at the time and it turns out that I was mistaken so I dropped it. The transition to RR was the next logical option given my list of reads.This is right after the accusation of Dad lying that was shown to be a false accusation. This vote on RR seems extremely convenient after that attempt to cast suspicion on Dad failed, but even more sketchy is Acrostic's reason to vote RR which he redirects to his #372: This post is mostly about Dad, and about not being a wagon hopper. The point about RR honestly didn't stand out upon my first read of it and this post shows a very weak intention to lynch RR until it becomes a necessity when the Dad point falls through.
Re-read and found it, tried to ask you for this yesterday. This struck me as a PL on someone who has been PL'ing others. Don't see this as being inherently scummy. Again.I've done this but I'll go again haha. I am calling RR scum because I dislike what he has done this game thus far. He hasn't scum-hunted really at all besides his tiny little push on you in the beginning but even then, it didn't hold much weight/didn't make sense. Lately the most he can be seen doing is policing inactives and that's it. When asked to give reads he cops out with saying, "The inactives are my scum-reads." which doesn't really help anything at the current time considering the entire game has a lot of inactives. Bottom line, he doesn't do much, he's a bit lurky, and he only focuses on inactives. The last point is the strongest point because that's all he has done.
#190 for LSTCould you give me your reasons for wanting Dad and July dead? Because I don't see it. And I'm pretty sure nobody else does either. I don't get the "Dad's been Dad" part either. And if LST didn't answer you, why not keep pressuring, especially if you think they have been avoiding answering you. Ask July about it.
I don't see how demoralizing town for tomorrow by forcing an NL is a better alternative. Especially since people will get "reads" from this lynch.Sangfroid said:And, I want RR dead over a NL any day, but you voting somebody just because other people want a hammer doesn't seem right.
Well Dad just posted. AM is V|LA and the hydra is mostly Washed I believe. Panta doesn't usually post a lot and Seph usually doesn't post that frequently either.Sang said:I'm more curious as to why Seph, AM, Panta, and Dad haven't been active in forever.
To save you from having to do an ISO:Vote: Acrostic I'm willing to listen to you J, consider it once in a lifetime. brb ISO'ing acrostic
@July: Can you explain why scum would try to bus their partner D1 while trying to establish distance?Sangfroid said:Kuz/Soup: He's just walking around in circles and I think that's just the hydra in general. But, he seems pretty town to me. But, he's attacking LST because he seems scummy, mostly because of one post where he pretty much just talks. To use Dad's words "all huff and puff and no action." He seems to be working, albeit in a slightly confusing manner. Town.
I did already. #700.Acro, do you plan on responding to July's big post against you?
People who didn't talk much near the end of yesterDay really should start talking.
At first yes it was dependent, however I actually did say that I changed my mind to regardless of RR's flip, I wanted you dead the most. Here is the post.Your case on a large part, was dependent on an RR scum flip. You stated that I was distancing myself from RR assuming that RR would flip scum. The fact that you're not reconsidering this irks me as you should be questioning further on how your context behind the lynch was wrong.
RR, agree with your 566 with extra emphasis on the ewww. Now I have changed my mind to regardless of what you flip, I want Acro looked up with extreme scrutiny. With what you pointed out in bold, I want people to look at your two's posts to see if they see what I am getting at. I was saying that I would explain it when I have the chance but I still believe you have a high probability of flipping scum.
Seik wagon, I will only be voting him if it is needed I hammer him, otherwise I want people on the RR wagon.
Woops my mistake. ^^"I did already. #700.