Reasons why I dislike RR and think he is scum:
1) He tells people not to stop the content at #119 but hasn't really offered much up for himself at that point.
2) He argues with Acro that Acro saying JTB is scummy will get people to vote for JTB. Pretty baseless being as people know that JTB is town.
3) In mostly all of his posts he makes comments but doesn't really give any reasons as to why he is feeling the way he is. Instead, he chooses to post quotes, expecting those to answer the questions as a cop-out of having to actually answer.
4) Earlier, he said that his views on Hilt were changing because of Hilt's posts but didn't really explain what had changed his views.
5) Later, he says that Panta has caught his eye as a scum pick after somebody else said something similar. He, also, doesn't give very many reasons as to why he does this.
6) When he does start to defend himself from people's questions it is for why he's willing to lynch inactives, not on his votes.
7) He says that Acro's posts don't seem to be doing any scum-hunting while his don't either.
8) He says to vote for either Acro, Seph, or Panta. Seph is explained (bieng absent, even though he was there for a while). Acro is... slightly explained. Panta is never explained, even though he says he has.
9) He says that Seikend destroyed his town read on him after the dislike of Seikend started slightly forming. Also, RR never, in any of his posts, said that he liked Seikend as town. He gives his reasons, but I don't like it.
10) He's dropped the Panta dislike and hasn't given any information as to why.
11) Later, he votes for Seph. Seems like he's jumping between votes pretty quickly.
12) He gives his reads in #562 but doesn't explain the town and null reads.
13) Most of his latest posts are him defending his claim.
14) He doesn't give reasons for voting somebody unless asked, and even then he mostly refers that person back to different posts in which the reasons are flimsy.
15) Then he says he hates Acro but will instead vote for Seikend.