Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Have you been reading Acro? We have explained why it is scummy for someone to do that and if you have actually read our back and forth, there is more then just that. You seem to be strawmanning the man attack against you.
Reasons for Daddy|Sang|July?
I believe I have addressed all the points wrt the points you have brought up, if I missed any then I apologize and will answer them. If I am strawmanning then it was not intentional, but a lot of content was bogus based on false reads connected between me and RR. If you won't question me further to test your reads because you already that confident, then I would appreciate it if you allowed me to ask for the justification in your reads wrt Dad|July|Sangfroid. IIRC you have a town read on Dad, town read on July, and a null-scum read on Sangfroid. Sorry in advance if I have any of your reads incorrect.
Dad never came through with justification on D1 when it came to his reads on RR|Seikend. He said he was going to out them, but he never got to it. A large part of Dad is unexplainable and despite this many people are okay with it despite him still being a hard read based on the aforementioned behavior.
god looking back at this post is so rubbish, panta deff feeling like scum and connected to HiltSeikend... doesn't have many posts. THen again, I can't saying anything.
He comes in after getting prodded and provides... what everyone has already said.
[]bI like his vote on Hilt because that is basically what I thought when I saw Hilt's vote on myself. However, it looks like he is trying to cozy up to me with his questioning of Hilt.[/b]
Hilt gave a pretty good reason as to why his vote was on me, in order to learn my playstyle. He said he probably wouldn't pursue my lynch because he wanted to pressure me in order to learn how I play. Seikend seems to totally ignore that fact, or he didn't see it.
I don't like his reason for his reads on Dad. In the beginning he said, oh cool, I'm not gonna have a hard time reading Soup/Kuz because I have played with you guys before, and he uses that excuse again when J asked him about his read on Dad with regards to LST. All he states is that, their votes were weird, but I inclined to agree with Dad because we usually have the same reads in the end. What is that?
Seikend's justification for his reads on me, J, LST, and AM seem like a cop out too. They are all one liners that barely contribute and I think they don't meet the expectations of the people who asked the question.
I don't know why he would feel more confident with AM's reads when he called AM out saying that his entrance into this game was terabad. It just doesn't make sense. And by the way, when I think of AM... I can't think of anything. His posts are really annoying for me to read. >_>
365 is a nice little way of changing RR's wording, Seikend. First of all, you came in after J had established his reads and then you both got close saying you guys had such similar reads. You also talk about that in your own post. Did you forget about that?
Meh. I don't feel like it is SvS and like you all said they are both scummy. I can't put my finger on who is more scummy, though. :\
Since the deadline is so close, though, I am going with a Seikend vote.
Unvote
Vote: Seikend
I wouldn't say gut read, but I do feel like that slot is town. That read was at a point where I hadn't done any questioning for myself, so, yes, I guess you could consider some of those gut reads, but I don't think they are. I'm still sticking by my town read on him for the moment, though a few of my reads from that post have changed.
Bolded you say you are sorry for strawmanning but you do it in the very same sentence. No, a lot of the content wasn't based on the connection.
I don't get anything you are saying w.r.t. Hilt. I never thought of Hilt coming off as cocky/egotisical. However I guess I will have to wait till you show what exactly you are talking about.
Can you bring this up in quotes because I could of sworn they said somewhere why they were voting RR?
I look forward to see what you see of Sang.Acro said:
So you don't like her for adding onto my case on you? What I saw from July seemed more like her posting her thoughts on not just one scum-pick but 3 of them. Stances can match but are you trying to say you think they are fake to just match mine?Acro said:
Not even close and don't even try and throw that conspiracy theory around. The only one in that group i'd even consider having a group with is July. Sang I have my eye on and Daddy is just too flipping weird. Can you show where you believe that those three are hiding behind me in order to cover their ***es?Acro said:
Atm, I am currently wanting to look into you and Daddy more. Can you tell me what you think of Daddy just based on how he is posting toDay?
Can you tell us which reads have possibly changed?
Now that I know it annoys you I may just do it more. But fine I guess I guess I can stop calling you Daddy.
Why must you be an *** when you play this game? Like I have no idea what you are talking about whatsoever. I feel I am playing fine if not good for once so step off.
Ugh, I've been trying to catch up ever since I came home on Sunday. Got to about page 13, but unfortunately I either forgot to save my notes for the game or misplaced them, so I might have to start over again.
Realistically I haven't been. I was V/LA when I replaced Inferno and when I returned, it was night phase. My last post was my first one. =(
Oh, dad, I like when you spank me hard?
Honestly, J is a little hard to read because he posts a lot as both town and scum. However, this particular post caught my eye. Not sure if meta, but it feels like he's sincerely hurt here by your accusations and I think scum J would have approached you differently.
LOL
How would scumJ have approached me differently?
