mountain_tiger
Smash Champion
Link to original post: [drupal=2668]Euthanasia: should it be legalised?[/drupal]
Note: This blog is mainly looking at voluntary euthanasia. Involuntary euthanasia is a whole different ball game.
So far, euthanasia is only legal in a handful of European countries and a couple of US states. The question is, do you think that it should be legalised on a wider scale?
Personally, I think that it should, although I can sort of see the other side's point of view. I mean, if someone's suffering, and they don't want to live any longer and request death, wouldn't it be better for them to die painlessly rather than live and suffer needlessly?
Often religion comes into play with this, with the idea that, 'You shall not commit murder'. However, one of the other key messages of religion is to do good foro ther people. In that sense, killing someone who requests death could be considered an act of love, because you wouldn't want them to be in pain their whole life.
The 'slippery slope' argument doesn't really hold much ground if you think about it. Some say that it's 'the thin edge of the wedge', and it could lead to other decisions such as involuntary euthanasia taking place. However, there's quite a big difference between the two. The difference between killing WITH permission and without permission is quite big.
Still, that's basically my view on it. What do you think?
Note: This blog is mainly looking at voluntary euthanasia. Involuntary euthanasia is a whole different ball game.
So far, euthanasia is only legal in a handful of European countries and a couple of US states. The question is, do you think that it should be legalised on a wider scale?
Personally, I think that it should, although I can sort of see the other side's point of view. I mean, if someone's suffering, and they don't want to live any longer and request death, wouldn't it be better for them to die painlessly rather than live and suffer needlessly?
Often religion comes into play with this, with the idea that, 'You shall not commit murder'. However, one of the other key messages of religion is to do good foro ther people. In that sense, killing someone who requests death could be considered an act of love, because you wouldn't want them to be in pain their whole life.
The 'slippery slope' argument doesn't really hold much ground if you think about it. Some say that it's 'the thin edge of the wedge', and it could lead to other decisions such as involuntary euthanasia taking place. However, there's quite a big difference between the two. The difference between killing WITH permission and without permission is quite big.
Still, that's basically my view on it. What do you think?