Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
I don't understand what you're saying here. Am I not supposed to say anything when someone says something that could be bad for me?The fact that that vote was a mere joke as did many people. =.= Mediocre, I must say this. How come your the one who always speaks up during every time someone says something which could possibly be bad to you?
Actually yeah... lets.So how about we all say who's town and who's mafia... that will really help us start narrowing down our options..
Be honest guys.
Wow, this reminds me of Food Court MafiaSo how about we all say who's town and who's mafia... that will really help us start narrowing down our options..
Be honest guys.
Well, yeah, I don't see it as Mediocre trying to start a fight, but rather trying to get the most he can with so little information. He hasn't defended anyone, or changed the topic while it was heating up or anything.Okay, after observing what people have been saying, I have come to focus my suspicion on someone - Mediocre. It's day one, usually a random lynch. The mafia will do whatever it takes to take all attention away from eachother, yes? Well that is exactly what mediocre seems to be doing. He isn't just voting on suspicion, he almost seems to be looking for a reason to suspect someone.
FOS: Mediocre
exactly. if everyone says they are town then we don't lose anything... If people float around the idea instead of just making that simple statement we are wasting time. there is an off chance that maybe someone can't lie about their alignment.Um, I don't disagree per say, but you would say that even if you were mafia, so saying you are town really doesn't make you any less suspicios.
Well, yeah. I fail to see how this is a bad thing.He isn't just voting on suspicion, he almost seems to be looking for a reason to suspect someone.
Really? I'm not familiar with that game, so any insights it could give us would probably be quite helpful.Wow, this reminds me of Food Court Mafia
(http://smashboards.com/showthread.php?t=80127&highlight=Food+court+mafia)
Sorry, but your plan seems like a total waste of time to me.exactly. if everyone says they are town then we don't lose anything... If people float around the idea instead of just making that simple statement we are wasting time. there is an off chance that maybe someone can't lie about their alignment.
Well, I remember someone taking charge(or at least they thought that they had control) made a list of every player in the game, and, luckily, we were active enough to have every player nameclaim, not roleclaim. Then again, due to the game's bizarre cast, we were reaching conclusions such as, "oh, well BK and McDonald's are fast-food....so they must be mafia since they are bad for you?" and "hey, Subway has those commercials lecturing you on how healthy they are, it's obviously town". It was in no way comparable to this games cast, so I doubt it would help much. I merely pointed it out to show everyone how we did it, since it did work quite well, as the Town won that game. Pretty funny looking back on it now.Really? I'm not familiar with that game, so any insights it could give us would probably be quite helpful.
I pointed that out earlier, but I guess <3 missed it.Sorry, but your plan seems like a total waste of time to me.
I could tell you I was town, or mafia, or Kira, and you'd have no way of knowing it was true. The chances of someone having a role that prohibits them from lying about their alignment are just so minuscule that it's not even worth the bother.
I don't care why, what ever the reason is it is boundless and silly. My method is 100% guaranteed to work if people co-operate. medi instead on posting a three paragraph post instead of simply saying "I'm not mafia" even if the chance is minuscule it is still there.Why? Your the one who seems to always defending people, almost trying to lead votes away as one could say.
He's only gotten Mr.Lombardi to do it, and since so many people disagree with him right now, of course he's going to be quick to defend himself. And no one is going to take him seriously if he doesn't "intellegently" defend himself through posts. You're just pointing out the obvious, and misunderstanding it while doing so.Vote: <3
I swear. <3 is too suspicious. I mean. Come on.. He basically calls out his role out of nowhere, somehow getting others to do it as well, being intellegently posting to defend himself a little TOO well and TOO often.... etc. etc.
He's defending his idea, not other people.Why? Your the one who seems to always defending people, almost trying to lead votes away as one could say.
That's a possibility I must admit I didn't consider, and really should have. It's unlikely, but not impossible.Maybe you've got some role where you can only kill people who use that phrase you want us all to say?
No kidding.I figure it's not an intrusive plan if we all just say it as we post. But really, you saying that the plan must be over someone's head is ridiculous. You really are acting way more suspiciously than anyone else.