It's like <3 said votes now are near useless you need sixteen; <3 believes egrunts has there. <3's attempt was to put pressure on egruntz, not to get sympathy for him.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Lol, I believe <3 is referring to himself in the third person.plus you are talking funny. i dont understand whats going on
<3 will explain it later.unless pi is the queen of england, he should cut it out. AKA CUT IT OUT!
All the more reason.I see what you are saying though, maybe he will do something suspicious. On the other hand, maybe you will slip up?
In past games <3 has put pressure on lurkers and afkers (By, omg, voting) in order to get them more into the game and posting more often... but in all of his previous mafia games <3 has been mafia. And that was simply a ploy to get attention away from <3's comrades in those games most mafia were active posters.what about the people who havnt posted yet, or the people who have only posted about once or twice since i brought up that the mafia may be lurkers.
...genius.Maybe <3's role IS Tera. And she'd probably be mafia just because she was so annoying.
http://smashboards.com/member.php?u=39840Who's Tera??
Smashman90 gets in then?I've decided that I'm not going to join this Mafia game so if Eor approves, any replacements can take my place.
This post just strikes me wrong... there are tons of things wrong with it.So his third person talking has to do with his role. We could speculate about it, but I guess that might help Kira. Man, we need to lynch Kira already. Everyone go watch Deathnote so we can come up with a plan to catch Kira.
Also, I usually don't mind No lynches, but in a game this big any lynch will help more than it will hurt. Besides, if we are careful enough we could even catch a mafiat.
From your reaction, it looks like <3 is doing a great job with his role(considering that is his role. Like Kevin said though, think things through a little more. I think you're being serious anyway.Well when everyone thought that tera was a mafia role that <3 has, KevinM was quite quick to come to his defense saying to stop thinking about roles. I still don't think I'm gonns take that as a tell, but I will soon vote for <3 out of being pissed off witht he third person stuff
If <3 isn't penalized for this slip-up, I would think that it's safe to assume that his role isn't hindered by speaking in 3rd person. Then again, that's assuming that we'll be able to detect if he is penalized. For all we know, everything may look the same to us after he is penalized, but he may actually be stripped of his night role for a turn, or something like that.So he can potentially slip up if he is indeed mafia.
Who here has played a mafia game before? Our goal isn't to be best friends for ever it's to get rid of the mafia the best way to do that is interrogate people well unless I've missed something. You want to see who stands up for who or what the intelligence people have to offer to the town. Or who tries to stack on last minute votes. You won't accomplish these goals without taking risks. At least that's what <3 thinks.
I really doubt Kira is town. Sure, he targets mainly criminals, but he's also not averse to killing any innocents who put him at risk. I don't know exactly what makes a role "town" (I guess it varies from game to game), but I don't think Kira would be one.This post just strikes me wrong... there are tons of things wrong with it.
A) Unless Im mistaken, we arent sure if Kira is anti-town, right? S/he (sorry, dont read deathnote) could easily be town or mafia or independent, aye? If s/he is town, it could be incredibly powerful for the town. Even if shes independent, it still could greatly benefit the town, so why so quick to write him/her off?
You just totally misunderstood DF's post. Read it again. He says almost exactly the opposite of what you think he said. He was agreeing with you.B) I just said No Lynches are bad except in certain circumstances! In no way does it help the town this early, only the mafia!
C) How the hell will a no lynch result in us catching a mafia member?
D) You are relatively experienced, you should know this stuff about no lynches.
So yeah, really dont like this and as votes aren't real powerful since there are so many people...
unvote: Frozen
Vote: Diamond Falcon
This is tricky, because in the anime, Kira first sees himself as God, a protector of justice he likes to put it. Soon though, Kira is so feared by the common people(because there are so many random killings) that having your name given out(if he knows your name, he can kill you by writing it down) is worse than having your social security # known.This post just strikes me wrong... there are tons of things wrong with it.
A) Unless Im mistaken, we arent sure if Kira is anti-town, right? S/he (sorry, dont read deathnote) could easily be town or mafia or independent, aye? If s/he is town, it could be incredibly powerful for the town. Even if shes independent, it still could greatly benefit the town, so why so quick to write him/her off?
He just said, "any lynch will help more than it will hurt", which pretty much nulls your reason for voting on him, doesn't it?B) I just said No Lynches are bad except in certain circumstances! In no way does it help the town this early, only the mafia!
Look above.C) How the hell will a no lynch result in us catching a mafia member?
And can people please stop voting for egruntz without giving any reason? It's gotten to the point where it's beyond joking now, and as such it needs to be justified.
As such, I'm voting for axemangx, as he's the most recent to place a vote on egruntz without any kind of reasoning. Until he takes his vote off or gives some explanation, my vote will stay.
Vote: axemangx
I don't like voting for someone with such a stupid reason, but this bandwagon needs to stop really soon.
This was 9 minutes before Mediocres post.unvote: egruntz
*raises hand* Ooh! ooh! I do! I do! lolzWho here has played a mafia game before?
Aah, so you don't want to be my friend?Our goal isn't to be best friends for ever it's to get rid of the mafia the best way to do that is interrogate people well unless I've missed something.
The fact that that vote was a mere joke as did many people. =.= Mediocre, I must say this. How come your the one who always speaks up during every time someone says something which could possibly be bad to you?And can people please stop voting for egruntz without giving any reason? It's gotten to the point where it's beyond joking now, and as such it needs to be justified.
As such, I'm voting for axemangx, as he's the most recent to place a vote on egruntz without any kind of reasoning. Until he takes his vote off or gives some explanation, my vote will stay.
Vote: axemangx
I don't like voting for someone with such a stupid reason, but this bandwagon needs to stop really soon.
I stated my reason a page back.Mediocre, he was unvoting with no reason.