Fully caught up now.
@Clover: [repeat question] What is your relationship with J? Do you know him personally, or is there a reason why he seems to be the person you are most comfortable talking to in this thread? How about with John?
@Soup: What made you bring up the possibility of a Sword/Inferno scumteam?
@Krystedez: I know it's your style, but it must have been said many times to you before that your "everyone is null" careful approach is very anti-town, because it makes you impossible to read, right? ._. What do you look for when reading other players? If you have even slight leans, let us know. If those leans change later, that's fine - let us know again and tell us why they change. It's pretty simple.
@John: Saying something that's already been said is better than saying nothing at all. At least we can see where your head is. I was really annoyed with your play in Paper Mario just reading it - you've been around long enough that this kind of play is no longer excusable. Do something. If you're worried about being called scummy for sheeping, just know that you're going to be called scummy for not commenting at all anyways.
@Macman: I see why your vote was on Sword now, so you can ignore my previous question. What's your reasoning for voting Inferno?
@J: In 209 you bring up that Sword has supposedly only once been pressured as town. What conclusions are you drawing from this? The post kinda sticks out, so I'm wondering where you were going with it?
@Gheb: Do you agree with the points against Sword, and are dismissing the wagon because of the "unanimous" support for it? Or do you disagree with the points against him as well? In your eyes, what about Sword's play has been scummy, if anything?