#HBC | Laundry
Grand Sage of Swag
I don't like the art of Piero Manzoni, Marcel Duchamp, etc.it doesn't go both ways though. Like I said before, art is subjective. I can only rate how much I like something based on how much I like it. There's no reason for me to factor other people's opinions into my own.
For the unlearned, Piero Manzoni would take his own ****, put it in a can, label it "Artist's ****" or "Merda D'Artista" for you Italians, and pass it off as art. Marcel Duchamp was the grandfather of that bull****. It all started with this:
![](http://www.invisiblebooks.com/fountain.jpg)
He submitted this beauty into the Armory Show back in the teens of the last century and it got accepted. This is considered art now. It falls under the category of a "readymade," an object already made that gets chosen by an artist and elevated to art status. That urinal spawned a bunch of others of its kind as well as inspiring plenty of other artists through it.
Not many people like the actual art these guys do. From an aesthetic standpoint, their work is literally **** or stolen, respectively.
But regardless of your taste of these artists' work, this is still good art. Most people hate them. When I had no idea about them, I certainly thought what they were doing was bull**** upon first exposure. But then I figured out their goal. Marcel Duchamp wanted to kill art. He hated it, hated the system it had come from, hated aesthetics, and felt that everything done was bull****. So he set out to try to question the value of art by putting in a ****ing urinal, signed under an alias, to see if it'd get accepted. It did, and now thanks to that, we have so much that came about as a response. Duchamp failed at killing art, but he damn well succeeded at provoking it and very much changed it in his own regards. Without Duchamp, we wouldn't have artists like Cage, Rauschenberg, Jasper Johns, Manzoni even, as well as conceptual art, performance arts, and other things that didn't fit into the definition of it. If there are times where you look in a museum and are questioning why something that's not a painting/drawing/sculpture of accepted materials is considered art, you have Duchamp to thank for that. If he isn't a good artist, in your eyes, he's at the very least important and there's no denying that.
That's why, while I can hate Fountain and Merda d'Artista all I want from an aesthetic standpoint, I can still love and appreciate what they stand for and what they did for artists and art as a whole.
Don't be so close-minded. Your subjective tastes don't define whether art is good or not.