pockyD
Smash Legend
What's hysterical about this is that he beat Mango and STILL didn't make it out of pools lmao round 2 of pools was horrendously gay for everyone. They should have gone directly to brackets after the first round just like the first RoM did. Pools are so dumb when you have to beat a top level player to make it out.
I've come around on pools and have decided that there needs to be a distinction for Pro players so that they don't assrape pools. like, 2nd round, 2 people make it out and if you had cactuar/jman/mango/hbox/PP in your pool, you're playing for 1 spot, which is stupid as ****. Or make larger pools with more people getting out.
Exactly, I have a similar bs story on why I didn't make it out of round 2 either. The point is pools are ****ing stupid and there should just one of them at most unless you have a million entrants. I honestly don't see what's wrong with having a super large bracket. It's a lot more fair and interesting.
This is all based on the idea that making it "into the bracket" is some sort of significant accomplishmentBut yeah, two sets of pools stacks the deck against mid and low-level players. Some of the 2nd pools from VLS were just insane.
Let's say that instead of doing a 2nd round of pools, they put all the players that made it out of 1st round directly into a bracket, then you go 2 and out in the bracket...
did you really accomplish any more in that case, playing 2 more matches, as compared to you getting 4th or 5th in the 2nd round of pools after playing 5 more matches?
the answer is no; there's nothing special about making it 'into the bracket' if you're just 2-and-out fodder anyway, just as there's nothing special about entering a tournament that didn't have pools to begin with
Even in a tournament with 1 round of pools, your accomplishment is that you made it out of 1st round of pools, not that you made it into the bracket. the fact that they are synonymous is just part of the system
I agree that taking 2 out kind of sucks, but frankly, i typically LOVE having the unbeatable 1-seed in my pool, if only because that generally correlates with having a very very beatable 2-seed... the hardest pools to advance from are those that do not have a clearly defined best player and instead have a glut of closely matched players at the top
...pools like pakman's. I personally think this is more of a problem with the tie-breaker system than anything; I think that we have all be trained to not value individual games (I have seen multiple players forfeit game 2 in a set just to keep the momentum) and instead just care about the set result, so I don't know that having games be a tiebreaker is legit. Obviously, there's nothing tangibly better and 3-way ties are just nightmares for the TOs to begin with, as even if you make them play it out again (a sort of 3-man pool), that will take at least half an hour and there's no guarantee that you'll come any closer to a 1-2-3 ordering.
Losing one set and being out of the tournament is really rather atrocious, but I don't see an easy way around it
edit: taking 3 out doesn't truly fix the problem because it's just as likely that the tie will be for 2nd place (between 2-3-4) as it is for 1st (1-2-3)