Mii Costume, not much an issue.and I currently think Spring Man's the least likely out of the bunch given that he had both a Mii Costume and AT. It's a big elephant in the room
His AT status is the REAL elephant in the room.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Mii Costume, not much an issue.and I currently think Spring Man's the least likely out of the bunch given that he had both a Mii Costume and AT. It's a big elephant in the room
It would make sense seeing as how Clefairy was planned to be Pokemon's mascot at one point before the anime happened and Pikachu became a literal household nameSpring Man was the poster boy for ARMS for sure and he was made the assist trophy, no doubt, for that reason. But we don't know what the future of ARMS is right now. The comic book was suppose to come out AGES ago and delve deeper into Spring Man's lore. But the comic book never came, but as of this January Dark Horse has said that the book is still in production. It's possible the whole thing has been rebooted and the story changed. Min Min could very well get a big push as a result of winning the party crash bash. In fact, Twintelle may get a big push as her popularity sprung purely from her design, the ads barely had much fanfare for her, other than some savvy screenshots. She was made available later in the Global Online Test Punch for the game as a result of that. It wasn't in the original plan.
We'll see what happens. As others have said, Nintendo decided to try and control speculation this time around and are having us ponder who the ARMS fighter could be. Under pre-release conditions, Spring Man would've been the obvious choice. Right now, we don't know what Nintendo has in mind for ARMS as an IP. I imagine the chosen character, whoever it may be, will be used in a bigger push for the ARMS IP lore and/or marketability.
Pikachu is Pokemon's mascot today, but everything we know and love about the little rodent came from the Pokemon Anime (including the infamous 'say your own name' voice), which came after the release of Red/Blue/Green.
Of course, that's not stopping Spring Man from being promoted in future games.I'm gonna take this from the Min Min thread:
It would make sense seeing as how Clefairy was planned to be Pokemon's mascot at one point before the anime happened and Pikachu became a literal household name
tl;dr - it's possible Min Min will replace Spring Man as ARMS's true mascot. Spring Man stays an AT but Min Min becomes playable in Smash
Oh it's more than that, it's a NESTED debate.how about Xenoblade? the Rex vs Elma wars would be in full force... though I personally think Rex is the least likely there due to him being not just a Mii Costume, but one that's bundled with a paid-for pass (aka not in the base game).
Rex is an awkward case because of the Mii costume. It's not something important and there's several costumes of playable characters, but... It's a special bonus for the fighter pass 1. It would be weird to sell the costume, locked behind the pass, then the character.how about Xenoblade? the Rex vs Elma wars would be in full force... though I personally think Rex is the least likely there due to him being not just a Mii Costume, but one that's bundled with a paid-for pass (aka not in the base game).
2 also has music in the base game. Not a lot, but music nevertheless. X has no music whatsoever, same with ARMS. they could have included ARMS music with Spring Man's AT but they didn't.Rex is an awkward case because of the Mii costume. It's not something important and there's several costumes of playable characters, but... It's a special bonus for the fighter pass 1. It would be weird to sell the costume, locked behind the pass, then the character.
Now, the costume definitely is a "sorry, Xenoblade 2 was too late, this is a consolation prize" and the Fighter pass 2 is already going back on things that couldn't happen with Arms. + This time, the bonus costume is a mere BotW armor, so it's definitely seen as a small bonus. I don't think Rex cannot happen because of the costume. It's just something to consider, as they could think it's "enough". But on the same time, they could think that selling Rex twice is also something possible...
how about Xenoblade? the Rex vs Elma wars would be in full force... though I personally think Rex is the least likely there due to him being not just a Mii Costume, but one that's bundled with a paid-for pass (aka not in the base game).
Here's the really odd thing about that: Rex is the only character Sak openly and sincerely apologized for not getting in, which makes me think he regretted having to pass over him. He'd pretty much be the only real way to capitalize on Xenoblade Definitive Edition's recent successful sales.Rex is an awkward case because of the Mii costume. It's not something important and there's several costumes of playable characters, but... It's a special bonus for the fighter pass 1. It would be weird to sell the costume, locked behind the pass, then the character.
Now, the costume definitely is a "sorry, Xenoblade 2 was too late, this is a consolation prize" and the Fighter pass 2 is already going back on things that couldn't happen with Arms. + This time, the bonus costume is a mere BotW armor, so it's definitely seen as a small bonus. I don't think Rex cannot happen because of the costume. It's just something to consider, as they could think it's "enough". But on the same time, they could think that selling Rex twice is also something possible...
The most bizarre thing is the fact that Nia's costume is base game while Rex is part of the pass.2 also has music in the base game. Not a lot, but music nevertheless. X has no music whatsoever, same with ARMS. they could have included ARMS music with Spring Man's AT but they didn't.
and since challenger packs come with music....
it IS pretty weird, yeahThe most bizarre thing is the fact that Nia's costume is base game while Rex is part of the pass.
oh the one where it says he'll eight different characters even though sakurai said the dev team was too small for that during dlc?The June 16th rumor that says Spring Man with alts of different characters and a sequel to Kencineroar as the trailer. June 16 is ARMS’s anniversary
And I've been publicly naysayed about some of these, too.Well, time to prepare if another "fan restriction barrier" is broken with the ARMS rep this close for reveal.
Image made was propably from twitter somewhere
Given Sak's spiel about fun over recognisability, that could be possible. And unlike Spring Man, never got in as an AT prior to becoming playable.I've said this before, but Smash has the clout that whatever character they put in from ARMS will become the new de-facto 'most recognisible ARMS character'. I can't see them feeling that they absolutely have to include the character they see as most recognisible, otherwise they'd just go with another franchise entirely.
I'm pretty sure it was only said they ran out of time (among other things) for Hero's alts. With the longer deadline, they might have got more room to breathe.oh the one where it says he'll eight different characters even though sakurai said the dev team was too small for that during dlc?
And if possible, check Nintendo Japan and Sakurai's Twitter accounts at 9am Japan time. That should be in 5 minutes from now.While I don't think they would shadowdrop the reveal, I am going to make an effort to check NoA's twitter every morning at 9am EST just in case
.
Not to mention Smash Bros JP.And if possible, check Nintendo Japan and Sakurai's Twitter accounts at 9am Japan time. That should be in 5 minutes from now.
If you're honestly implying that they completely scrapped the comic book and made it about a completely different character, then I think you're just seeing what you wanna see.I'm gonna take this from the Min Min thread:
It would make sense seeing as how Clefairy was planned to be Pokemon's mascot at one point before the anime happened and Pikachu became a literal household name
tl;dr - it's possible Min Min will replace Spring Man as ARMS's true mascot. Spring Man stays an AT but Min Min becomes playable in Smash
I don't think so, I just think it's something they never bother to alter. Though the problem might be that a change to the ATs must be universal and not just for those who have the DLC.Considering no DLC has ever brought any new assist trophies, is there some kind of developmental problem with changing anything related to them post launch?
And afterthat another, then another, then another...To another endless guessing game?
...I don't think the statement was meant to be taken so broadly. They really only intended an actual guessing game for the ARMS character, that's it.And afterthat another, then another, then another...
6 endless guessing games ahead of us, for that is the way of Smash Speculation.
With enough luck, we may get character 7 announced soonish but I'm not holding my breath thanks to Covid....I don't think the statement was meant to be taken so broadly. They really only intended an actual guessing game for the ARMS character, that's it.
Anyway, as long as we don't get 6 more instances of specific mistranslated Sakurai lines, because lord knows the fanbase is already enough of a mess from trying to figure out what'll happen, or what the creators intended.
I wouldn't worry too much. Since Sak had measures set up not too long after initial worries, who knows which lengths he went to accomplish his life's mission? We're talking a guy who keeps his cards close to his chest, much like Nintendo.With enough luck, we may get character 7 announced soonish but I'm not holding my breath thanks to Covid.
You aren't paying for the Rex costume in FP1, you're paying for the actual fighters.Rex is an awkward case because of the Mii costume. It's not something important and there's several costumes of playable characters, but... It's a special bonus for the fighter pass 1. It would be weird to sell the costume, locked behind the pass, then the character.
Now, the costume definitely is a "sorry, Xenoblade 2 was too late, this is a consolation prize" and the Fighter pass 2 is already going back on things that couldn't happen with Arms. + This time, the bonus costume is a mere BotW armor, so it's definitely seen as a small bonus. I don't think Rex cannot happen because of the costume. It's just something to consider, as they could think it's "enough". But on the same time, they could think that selling Rex twice is also something possible...
Really depend on if character 7 was Nintendo's or a third parties. Nintendo may have it's own system of home working in place but I'm betting it's very internal (probably using the last AC: City Folk server and a Wii Speak) so communication with externals may prove more challenging.I wouldn't worry too much. Since Sak had measures set up not too long after initial worries, who knows which lengths he went to accomplish his life's mission? We're talking a guy who keeps his cards close to his chest, much like Nintendo.
Just wait and see what'll happen.
Probably, but some Japanese companies seem to be more progressive about it than others (hell, Capcom's initial response was to shut down completely), not to mention Western ones that are prepared by now. Besides, Sak is in an independent developer setup anyway and much of his current staff is from Bandai Namco.Really depend on if character 7 was Nintendo's or a third parties. Nintendo may have it's own system of home working in place but I'm betting it's very internal (probably using the last AC: City Folk server and a Wii Speak) so communication with externals may prove more challenging.
really? i thought sora was fully owned by nintendoProbably, but some Japanese companies seem to be more progressive about it than others (hell, Capcom's initial response was to shut down completely), not to mention Western ones that are prepared by now. Besides, Sak is in an independent developer setup anyway and much of his current staff is from Bandai Namco.
Entirely different situation.You're right it isn't like not even Nintendo staff as Sakurai stated knew that FP5 was gonna be Byleth.
Nice try, I actually fully believed that theoryAlso remember Box Theory which proved to be correct?
Lets also not forget the SNK leak, we already knew that'd be Terry to begin with.Entirely different situation.
Fire Emblem is made by Intelligent Systems, not Nintendo. And Three Houses specifically also has Koei Tecmo involved.
In other words, Sakurai was able to just never tell Nintendo because he never needed to communicate to them about Byleth.
This... cannot reasonably be done with ARMS because it's fully made in-house by the same team as Mario Kart.
Nice try, I actually fully believed that theory
That was a 75/25 split between him and Nakaruru from what I remember.Lets also not forget the SNK leak, we already knew that'd be Terry to begin with.
it was more 75% Terry, 15% Nakoruru, 10% Kyo (cause of some crackpot theory that Terry already appeared in a crossover title and Kyo didn't or something) and interestingly enough, 5% Mai [GOOD BOYS AND GIRLS INTENSIFIES]That was a 75/25 split between him and Nakaruru from what I remember.
In the end though it was clear Terry was the one because he's to SNK as Mario is to Nintendo, what Sonic is to Sonic and so on.That was a 75/25 split between him and Nakaruru from what I remember.
That's 105%. Unless that's a hint that Mai never ever had a chance.it was more 75% Terry, 15% Nakoruru, 10% Kyo (cause of some crackpot theory that Terry already appeared in a crossover title and Kyo didn't or something) and interestingly enough, 5% Mai [GOOD BOYS AND GIRLS INTENSIFIES]
curse you math!!That's 105%. Unless that's a hint that Mai never ever had a chance.
Being fair, Terry and the Fatal Fury series had a massive impact on the fighting genre and its legacy can still be felt in the latest King of Fighters titles.Lets also not forget the SNK leak, we already knew that'd be Terry to begin with.