Ken Neth
Smash Champion
Pessimistic or not, it's still his worst matchup. It's considered a really bad match up for snake by both pikas and snakes. I agree that there are a lot of pessimistic snake mains though.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
^This.well yeah. but nothing is unwinnable with snake... top tier players just not used to having bad matchups :L
I've heard that atleast 3 times in the past 2 months. lol.like some think the lucario matchup is close to even... lol.
Unity rules banned MK; Ran went by those http://www.smashboards.com/showthread.php?t=301033 and everyone said "k". And nothing ever happens in COWe're talking about Colorado.
None of that ever showed up here. He has always been played legitimately. We banned him preemptively. I don't even want to say "we". Ran banned him, and everyone was like "k".
Kind of embarrassing actually.
MK was the only reason those stages were banned. And learn to readThe IDC glitch is banned cuz its a game breaking GLITCH that just happened to be on the best character. If Ganon had IDC, it'd be banned.
Personally, I think RC/Brinstar shouldnt be banned. Norfair (as much as I like it) and Corneria, I do, but MK isnt the reason. As for the ledge grabs, those are for every character, not just MK. Sure, MK is the best at planking, but lots other characters can plank to, hell, I plank with Yoshi and Bowser more than probably anyone else in my state. LGLs were made to stop the game from evolving into a ledge camp fest, not to nerf MK.
As for the CP system, MK doesnt ruin it, no matter which stage you go to, there are characters that can beat him on it, and this has been proven time and time again.
And people CAN deal with MK, I dont see how you dont understand it. Name ONE instance EVER in the history of Smash where a National was completely dominated by MK to the point of MK taking all of top 8. MK is the best, and he does most things better than every other character, but he isnt invincible by any means, and unless the character completely invalidates all the other characters (hell, ICs and D3 invalidate more characters than MK), he shouldnt be banned.
You're argument was that WE in CO can't deal with MK which was ****ing stupid. Like most pro MK arguments you treat the opponents like a bunch of scrubs and ignore all facts and reason. If you don't like it then stay in Utah but don't BS us here.^Don't give that scrub explanation like people can't deal with MK.
Lol, my argument wasnt that you guys cant deal with MK, never did I ONCE say you couldnt, in fact, I said MK COULD be dealt with AT LEAST 3 times. My argument was that MK IS BEATABLE and that he isnt dominant to a point where he should be banned.You're argument was that WE in CO can't deal with MK which was ****ing stupid. Like most pro MK arguments you treat the opponents like a bunch of scrubs and ignore all facts and reason. If you don't like it then stay in Utah but don't BS us here.
This is why I hate talking about MK. You missed the point with stages/rules and act like those players weren't in MK legal tourneys too. Meno didn't decide yet.Sure, the results of Whobo were character varied, but do you realize the caliber of those players? You have the best (or very close to it) Snake, IC's, Pikachu, DK, Diddy, Ike, DDD, Ness, ZSS, Wolf, PT, Lucario and Peach in the nation all in one tourney, of course they are going to place well. Most players there placed well because they are a top caliber player, not because MK wasn't there. The only thing that MK would have changed was top caliber players using MK would have been mixed in those results with them. That's not a valid excuse for an MK ban.
I side with ZZ and Meno, MK shouldn't be banned. Especially in states like ours where MK isn't being pushed to his limits. But I'm not gonna debate it or tell you what to do, cause it's your state. You do what you want.
MK banned top tiers are splitting the winnings relatively evenly. MK legal, he has 36%.Alright, reboot of the old Success and Popularity thread, let's go!
In this thread, we'll be keeping track of how much money is won by each character in the game, and how often each character is used in tournament gameplay! We'll be focusing mainly on tournaments that have Meta Knight banned for this year's data collection, but we'll still continue to pay attention to MK Legal Tournaments.
By popular request, this data doesn't include the first weekend of January - the weekend of Apex.
How to read the charts:
- "Full Split" indicates that, if a player was mentioned as winning money with more than one character, the player's winnings will be evenly distributed among his or her characters.
- "No Split" indicates that, if a player was mentioned as winning money with more than one character, the player's winnings will NOT be evenly distributed among his or her characters.
- "Average" is the average of "Full Split" and "No Split."
MK Banned Tournaments
MK Legal Tournaments
If, for some reason you cannot view the images properly, try Right Clicking them and hitting "View Image," and it'll make them show up in their original size, although Smashboard's coding allows users to view images at full size by simply clicking on them nowadays.
Ran was the Unity committee. lolUnity rules banned MK; Ran went by those http://www.smashboards.com/showthread.php?t=301033 and everyone said "k". And nothing ever happens in CO
Ran was in the committee. We had a huge drought then he moved from LA, found a venue and started the scene again. ...and vanished off the face of the Earth lol. People agreed with Ran and many still do.Ran was the Unity committee. lol
Colorado never had an MK problem. He starting winning tournaments once people got developed with him (HOW STRANGE), but there was never any planking, or timing out, or general dooms-day jankiness. He got his wins fair and square (correct me if I'm wrong). He was banned on hype and hype alone.
I'm neither for or against a universal MK ban - but I am for banning only AFTER the problem has been documented IN PERSON, HERE, IN CO. cool graphs though
Honestly, it hurt our competitive integrity the way we let others decide our rulesets for us.
I think we're coming from the same place about CO making our own rules.Utah's just talking with us, lol.
The only people who decide CO ruleset's are CO TOs. If they want to come over here and host tournaments, all the power to them. Ran did just that. His reasoning, at the time, was "Unity".
Now that that's outdated - remaking a ruleset on our own, I only ask for evidence as to why MK should be banned here. So far I've yet to see any.
We talk about character and stage diversity, and being friendly to newcomers. Those are fine reasons to ban him, I say! But those are based around the politics of Smash, and we need to be clear as such.
We ban him because we don't like him, not because he's proven to be broken. We must be entirely clear on that point.
^. I hate being told get better by worse people who rely on high tiers at the expense of the CP stages/system.someone said:I literally haven't been reading any of your posts, because i'm not debating this with you.
I'm ignoring you and saying get better.
I have never been debating anything, because I don't believe there's anything to debate. Everybody ALREADY KNOWS MK is dumb (Like I've said before)
I'm not arguing stupid **** that will get me nowhere, i'm actually trying to progress kthanks
You can keep quoting every point I make like you have been because you're arguing with nobody, because i'm not arguing back, i'm just TELLING you get better, and get over it
you don't have to listen to me, but there's a reason even with your data and graphs nobody (at least i'm not) listening to you. Because people are beating MK despite him being "broken" or (whatever the heck your argument is) with dumb characters.
I'd be down to argue something worth arguing but this isn't worth arguing because at the end of the day someone else will beat an MK and you'll just have the data that tells you, you can't.
It's so ironic because i'm actually a very statistics factual person but I put my faith in the actual results of people who have gotten better and done it.