864today
Smash Rookie
Seriously, why is pokemon trainer so low?
All three of them are great
All three of them are great
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
It's pretty unbelievable. The human race never disappoints.The amount of people missing the point of this thread baffles me.
Well, if you are losing with Snake you probably aren't good, since you lost to someone using one of the best characters in the game.you see this makes me seem like I'm not good in brawl since my main is snake "The Character that wins all the tournies
QFT.And if you think a certain character is better and should be higher, that just means you are wrong, or no one has implemented that character in tournament play.
Ironically, you might not now that tier lists ARE based on tournament results...QFT.
Tier lists can go to hell, results are all that matter.
I was waiting for someone to say that.....lolIronically, you might not know that tier lists ARE based on tournament results...
lol, even if Snake just all of a sudden just stopped winning, it would still teake a very long time for everyone outside of MK to catch up with him.I don't like snake. '~'
*hopes for changes*
Hawaii Final Smash (3/16/08)Posting results along with a link to the thread would be best, Darkmusician.
Ironically, you may or may not know that people in the tier list threads are posting lists with complete ignorance of tourney results.Ironically, you might not now that tier lists ARE based on tournament results...
It's because half the people posting their opinions in those threads are scrubs who know jack about this game. Tier lists are accurate for the most part, and can be based on a bit of opinion backed by evidence on top of tournament results, but it's still so early in the game that most discussion of tier lists would only yield half accurate results.Ironically, you may or may not know that people in the tier list threads are posting lists with complete ignorance of tourney results.
There are other examples of tier lists not being based on actual gameplay, but I don't care to get into it right now.
Stfu, you don't know jack.It's because half the people posting their opinions in those threads are scrubs who know jack about this game. Tier lists are accurate for the most part, and can be based on a bit of opinion backed by evidence on top of tournament results, but it's still so early in the game that most discussion of tier lists would only yield half accurate results.
Who cares? Thats them and you said that tier lists can go to hell.Ironically, you may or may not know that people in the tier list threads are posting lists with complete ignorance of tourney results.
There are other examples of tier lists not being based on actual gameplay, but I don't care to get into it right now.
For a smash debater you do really poorly at trying to disprove him.jesiahTEG said:Stfu, you don't know jack.
all work and know play makes jack a dull boyStfu, you don't know jack.
How's this list garbage? The only thing it does is show tournament placings. People don't use Yoshi so he's last, Snake is used a lot, so what?This is list is garbage.
80% of those only apply to get a "zomgbeautiful colord name ^_^kawaii!!1"For a smash debater you do really poorly at trying to disprove him.
Why don't you come to Esticle and win it so you can prove your point? There'll be lots of Snakes there ready to kick your ***. And if you win? More power to you.This is list is garbage. Obviously, more popular characters are used more often, and as a result, people WILL become very fluent with the character(s). At which point, they'll go to tournaments and compete. What odds sound more likely, 1 really good Yoshi or 100 good Snakes? I think the winner is pretty obvious.
I'm going to stand by my opinion, Snake is garbage. Yes, I said it, go ahead and flame me if you believe you need to, but in my eyes he's garbage. (Yes, I'm a Snake fan, no I'm not biased.) I haven't played a single Snake I couldn't beat, and if you thought hard about his play style, he's not hard to beat. All of his attacks are situational, which means a Snake player will most likely play in a way that counteracts the current play styles of most characters ( the one's you guys are worth training to beat), which turns out to be his fault. If you play in an unorthidox method, you'll most likely win, because they won't know how to handle you.
Do you know how many times I've seen your argument of extremes? Do you know how many times I've addressed it in this thread already? Do you know how ******** it makes your argument look this late into the thread?This is list is garbage. Obviously, more popular characters are used more often, and as a result, people WILL become very fluent with the character(s). At which point, they'll go to tournaments and compete. What odds sound more likely, 1 really good Yoshi or 100 good Snakes? I think the winner is pretty obvious.
You're fully entitled to your opinions, but in case you didn't notice, my list isn't based on opinions. If you really think you're so good, why don't you prove yourself in a tournament and beat the 5 or so Snake players from New England who place at the top all the time?I'm going to stand by my opinion, Snake is garbage. Yes, I said it, go ahead and flame me if you believe you need to, but in my eyes he's garbage. (Yes, I'm a Snake fan, no I'm not biased.) I haven't played a single Snake I couldn't beat, and if you thought hard about his play style, he's not hard to beat. All of his attacks are situational, which means a Snake player will most likely play in a way that counteracts the current play styles of most characters ( the one's you guys are worth training to beat), which turns out to be his fault. If you play in an unorthidox method, you'll most likely win, because they won't know how to handle you.
Are you not understanding what I wrote, or did I just make it unclear? Wioth there being so many more Snake players, it's more likely that one of the Snakes is going to win. Things aren't based on a really equal scale where the best few of each character competes against the other best of each character.Why don't you come to Esticle and win it so you can prove your point? There'll be lots of Snakes there ready to kick your ***. And if you win? More power to you.
No, no, and absolutely, it does not, it only solidifies the argument being proposed. You are probably misunderstanding what I said too, the odds are more heavily stack against the other characteres, because their numbers are fewer. I didn't say I'd beat all competeing Snakes with Yoshi (fyi, I play Olimar, Pit, and Dedede).Do you know how many times I've seen your argument of extremes? Do you know how many times I've addressed it in this thread already? Do you know how ******** it makes your argument look this late into the thread?
You're fully entitled to your opinions, but in case you didn't notice, my list isn't based on opinions. If you really think you're so good, why don't you prove yourself in a tournament and beat the 5 or so Snake players from New England who place at the top all the time?
The numbers seem quite large for Marth, putting his representation up there. Yet, how many Wario players do you know? And he's up there in A Rank. Yeah, if for some odd reason everyone played Snake (lol New England), then there'd be little room for representation among any other characters, but that rarely is the case. Or are you saying there's a lot of Snakes, making Snake more likely to win? Because that's terrible logic. And, if you're saying Snake is only up there because of popularity and there are characters that can be really good that nobody is using... are you taking everyone else for morons? Tell me, would you pick Bowser or Kirby in Melee because you think they're really amazing characters in competitive play? People naturally gravitate toward what appears to be the strongest character to them, which happens to be one of the 10 or so in the S, A, and B ranks typically. If you're claiming some character isn't able to let his potential shine, well, that's the fault of all the people who use that character and don't represent in tournaments, isn't it?No, no, and absolutely, it does not, it only solidifies the argument being proposed. You are probably misunderstanding what I said too, the odds are more heavily stack against the other characteres, because their numbers are fewer. I didn't say I'd beat all competeing Snakes with Yoshi (fyi, I play Olimar, Pit, and Dedede).
That remains to be proven. Using hypothetical situations to argue against objective gathering of data is kind of moronic.Think about if more people liked Mario and R.O.B., wouldn't they play to master them like they have with Snake? Now imagin these same people came to the tournaments in the same numbers as Snake, wouild he still win? I doubt it.
It's just like how it was in Melee. In Melee, top Fox, Falco, Sheik, and Marth players won or placed high in most tournaments largely because those were good characters. In return, people noticed this, and started playing those characters because they felt that playing these characters increased their chance of winning. That further increased their popularity. Every now and then, you'd see someone who played a different character win or place well in a tournament.Are you not understanding what I wrote, or did I just make it unclear? Wioth there being so many more Snake players, it's more likely that one of the Snakes is going to win. Things aren't based on a really equal scale where the best few of each character competes against the other best of each character.
No, no, and absolutely, it does not, it only solidifies the argument being proposed. You are probably misunderstanding what I said too, the odds are more heavily stack against the other characteres, because their numbers are fewer. I didn't say I'd beat all competeing Snakes with Yoshi (fyi, I play Olimar, Pit, and Dedede).
Think about if more people liked Mario and R.O.B., wouldn't they play to master them like they have with Snake? Now imagin these same people came to the tournaments in the same numbers as Snake, wouild he still win? I doubt it.