Hitting people (not shields) with untippered aerials is good, but his frame data doesn't really allow him to combo anyone or anything to really abuse them.
A character like Mario, with relatively good mobility specs and frame data will do pretty well in a reaction-based game, much like why he was good in PM. From a short time playing the WiiU version, I can already tell how significantly better reaction players/play styles are. Mario may seem completely undercut by the characters Diddy Kong and Marth, both of which who take his CQC/combo-strength and reaction/spacing strengths to significantly higher heights respectively, but eh Mario being Diddy 0.75 still isn't a "worthless" character, it'll look a lot better for him comparatively once Diddy gets bopped.
Either way another multipage mario debacle because of ONE person mentioning the name with anything but "worst character/horrible" perspective. You may be a Mario Maestro but if Mario is able to have results, then you have to deal with it impartially rather than finding any reason you can to discredit the players involved.
At this stage we need tournament results, because theory has mostly been exhausted. I know you'd much rather have the unilateral backing of "mario is bad" so Sakurai takes notice for buffs, but that's practically cheating the meta. I know because I feel exactly the same; my character could be better and I'd almost rather people not have any results with him so there's a higher likelihood of tweaks. Fortunately I think Japan is primarily the focus, but on the Western Sphere there's at least two Marth mains winning/placing in tournaments already (myself and Killlock).
A character like Mario, with relatively good mobility specs and frame data will do pretty well in a reaction-based game, much like why he was good in PM. From a short time playing the WiiU version, I can already tell how significantly better reaction players/play styles are. Mario may seem completely undercut by the characters Diddy Kong and Marth, both of which who take his CQC/combo-strength and reaction/spacing strengths to significantly higher heights respectively, but eh Mario being Diddy 0.75 still isn't a "worthless" character, it'll look a lot better for him comparatively once Diddy gets bopped.
Either way another multipage mario debacle because of ONE person mentioning the name with anything but "worst character/horrible" perspective. You may be a Mario Maestro but if Mario is able to have results, then you have to deal with it impartially rather than finding any reason you can to discredit the players involved.
At this stage we need tournament results, because theory has mostly been exhausted. I know you'd much rather have the unilateral backing of "mario is bad" so Sakurai takes notice for buffs, but that's practically cheating the meta. I know because I feel exactly the same; my character could be better and I'd almost rather people not have any results with him so there's a higher likelihood of tweaks. Fortunately I think Japan is primarily the focus, but on the Western Sphere there's at least two Marth mains winning/placing in tournaments already (myself and Killlock).
EL forgot to realise the context of diddy is primarily one of "Apex is soon, the biggest tournament of the year which will be Smash4's biggest showing by far, and there won't be a patch for this and we're going to have to deal with this monkey likely dominating". I think we're all sure that Diddy will get nerfed by Sakurai, but it doesn't matter [right now] unless it's going to happen within the next month and a half. For the next month and a half Diddy is going to be nearly 100% of every top level player's efforts, either in learning him or dealing with him. My facebook feed tells me the truth.Man I know Emblem Lord didn't like the Diddy talk but at least we all got along during it....
.
Last edited: