V1CE
Smash Champion
If your a smasher in charlotte and wanna chill today ima be chillen at uncc. Dinner tonight at Buffalo wild wings aaawwwww yeaaaa :D hit me up if you want to join...
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Ron come play Brawl with me plox (tomorrow).looks like a job for me
time to main lucario
This sounds like fun man, too bad I live 2 hours awayIf your a smasher in charlotte and wanna chill today ima be chillen at uncc. Dinner tonight at Buffalo wild wings aaawwwww yeaaaa :D hit me up if you want to join...
I didn't really keep count, and I don't think he did either.who won more between u and zero jaurice?
But.. what he said wasn't true.The one sexist remark in the video doesnt make what was said in the video any less true.
We'll see in four months.
yea dude... DAMMWhat are you talking about Ron? Sanford?
The video just made me realize as a marvel two player things that I was feeling I was not alone in. Ive got no problem with the people who play this game, or the game itself. I acknowledge that there are problems in the game that I sincerly hope capcom will fix through the patch, which would be amazing. The problems in the game just make me not want to play it that much.so snap loses intrest at a game he wanted to play for so long, because a top lvl player says a little bad things about it...
god this dude is more flaky than that Tony the Tigers cereal.
1) X-factor is part of the game and everyone has it at one point and time. His arguement was that Yipes was outplaying him the whole time but lost because his opponent pressed four buttons at the same time. Can't Yipes also press four buttons at the same time? Hell, he can press x-factor DURING block stun, if he expected his opponent to use x-factor and spam attacks he could do the same.
2) His second point relied on the fact that the person who was losing was actually made and hated the game because he lost. This isn't the case because no one -actually- know if the person being discussed would get mad if he started losing.
3) This point doesn't even make sense. "The game's *** because people like you are good at it". A good point out here would be people like mikeHAZE, Reflex, etc. who were decent at Melee, and made the move to Brawl where their intelligence shined through with the lack of technical boundaries gone. Does that make Brawl ***? Not really, it's just a different game, hell, it still has general aspects of a fighting game (no tripping, infinites, etc.) So it's definitely not *** in that regard.
4) Women beating men isn't anything bad. Women are naturally less powerful than men, even deeper into that, women are less inclined (it seems) to play video games than men. So women beating men at this game does to an extent say something, but doesn't that put the men who played those women in question? I could understand what sanford is saying if a woman off the streets picked up the game and started beating jwong, but that's not the case.
5) New school games are catered towards scrubs, I agree with this statement, but that doesn't make it ***, it just makes the gap between pros and scrubs smaller.