HolyNightmare
Smash Champion
You got it, lets do iiiiit!AvariceX
I take your proposition and raise you a bBrawl over Brawl+
To Holy:
Bo5 bBrawl Yoshi VS ROB? $5?
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
You got it, lets do iiiiit!AvariceX
I take your proposition and raise you a bBrawl over Brawl+
To Holy:
Bo5 bBrawl Yoshi VS ROB? $5?
I'm never going to play bBrawl because I see it as a hopeless endeavor that will never actually accomplish what it set out to do; and that's just because I know a little bit about how "balance" worksAvariceX
I take your proposition and raise you a bBrawl over Brawl+
To Holy:
Bo5 bBrawl Yoshi VS ROB? $5?
Sounds epic. I am now definitly coming to this. Kr3w shall we release the bogus in doubles?Blahblahblah melee too on that night, with probably brawl + doubles too.Blahblahblah.
The changes to Brawl+ as of late are much less arbitrary actually, especially now that there are proper representatives for each of the characters. Regardless, even if they are arbitrary they are still aimed at the same goal - making the game more 'fun'. While it is possible to have some semblance of balance in a game (certainly more-so than vBrawl anyway), it is actually impossible to have true balance; even Checkers is imbalanced. That's why I believe Brawl+' goal of improving enjoyability over balance is a more realizable goal; and they actually haven't done a bad job of keeping the balance relatively in check.EDIT: Avarice, at least they have a set goal instead of some arbitrarly changing one like B+, and isnt led by the wrong people.
Sure Thing.Sounds epic. I am now definitly coming to this. Kr3w shall we release the bogus in doubles?
oh ****.Be attending.
He actually stated hes attending now >.>me either
10jers
I cant ban metaknight, our metagame revolves so much around him it would be impossible to ban him.i think myself as well as others from kingston might make it.
@swordgard: ....is mk banned????? ohgtan.
fun =/= competitive. It is hard to take a game seriously when balance is just an afterthought.The changes to Brawl+ as of late are much less arbitrary actually, especially now that there are proper representatives for each of the characters. Regardless, even if they are arbitrary they are still aimed at the same goal - making the game more 'fun'. While it is possible to have some semblance of balance in a game (certainly more-so than vBrawl anyway), it is actually impossible to have true balance; even Checkers is imbalanced. That's why I believe Brawl+' goal of improving enjoyability over balance is a more realizable goal; and they actually haven't done a bad job of keeping the balance relatively in check.
Whatever, fun is subjective.
I probably won't be able to make it to this though if we have to be there on the Friday... class until 2PM and then a 10-hour drive to Mtl doesn't quite work out.
Everything is tied together. The better characters obviously have better matchups than the worst; how else would you go about to explain top tier dominance? Better moveset?Being viable doesn't have anything to do with unwinnable matchups.
Brawl and blazblue are on saturday, but if you wanna be there for B+ and melee then yeah your gonna miss on it.The changes to Brawl+ as of late are much less arbitrary actually, especially now that there are proper representatives for each of the characters. Regardless, even if they are arbitrary they are still aimed at the same goal - making the game more 'fun'. While it is possible to have some semblance of balance in a game (certainly more-so than vBrawl anyway), it is actually impossible to have true balance; even Checkers is imbalanced. That's why I believe Brawl+' goal of improving enjoyability over balance is a more realizable goal; and they actually haven't done a bad job of keeping the balance relatively in check.
Whatever, fun is subjective.
I probably won't be able to make it to this though if we have to be there on the Friday... class until 2PM and then a 10-hour drive to Mtl doesn't quite work out.
Why do you take the Smash series seriously then?fun =/= competitive. It is hard to take a game seriously when balance is just an afterthought.
Better moveset = Better Character = Better Matchups.Everything is tied together. The better characters obviously have better matchups than the worst; how else would you go about to explain top tier dominance? Better moveset?
I do? I did sell my Wii months ago for SF4. And the number of times I've showed up to a weekly during the summer can be counted on one hand. I saw light in bB but clearly, with an un-supportive community I do realize it has no future.Why do you take the Smash series seriously then?
I "responded" to my own question to make you think about what you wrote yourself. And even now you remain oblivious to that fact. One element simply cannot be disassociated from the other. Better matchups are a consequence of a character's better moveset. Hence why claiming character viability has nothing to do with un/winnable match-ups is erroneous. How do you not see this?Better moveset = Better Character = Better Matchups.
It's funny how you respond to your own question.
Yes, you do.I do? I did sell my Wii months ago for SF4. And the number of times I've showed up to a weekly during the summer can be counted on one hand. I saw light in bB but clearly, with an un-supportive community I do realize it has no future.
See what?I "responded" to my own question to make you think about what you wrote yourself. And even now you remain oblivious to that fact. One element simply cannot be disassociated from the other. Better matchups are a consequence of a character's better moveset. Hence why claiming character viability has nothing to do with un/winnable match-ups is erroneous. How do you not see this?
I'll join a bBrawl event if there's time, friday will be for Brawl+ and melee. I'm pretty sure we will have extra time for bBrawl singles after the vBrawl tournament saturday.Have you ever even TRIED Balanced Brawl?
It's at least 200% more balanced than vBrawl.
A general consensus of the compression:
We believe that the tiers have been compressed between vMarth and vIke.
No 100:0 matchups have been found. Heck, no 70:30 matchups have been found! Everybody has a chance at winning a tournament at high-level play! No character is 100% shut down by somebody else. They all have ways around it now.
And the great thing about bBrawl is that it's still Brawl, and not some horrible mutation that Brawl+ is!
I 100% support bBrawl. If it comes to the point that people will listen to me if I never play vBrawl again, then goddammit, I'll do that. bBrawl is completely superior to vBrawl. There is no reason to play vBrawl anymore now that a better Tournament Standard has been introduced.
Ganondorf used to have nothing. NOTHING. Now his DownB plows through ~90% of every projectile in the game when fresh. He has 0-death techchases on numerous parts of the cast once he mindgames his way in. The G&W/Yoshi VS Ganon matchup is so intense. They both have an option that if they play unhumanly perfect, Ganondorf will never get in, but once Ganondorf capitalises on our mistakes, our stock is as good as gone, as long as Ganondorf predicts well. He has true reward for his high risk now.
There are no more "Game Over" infinites, except for a 1-frame window ICs infinite.
I will personally, all on my own, run a side-event of bBrawl if there is time.
You are only helping a vicious cycle: You have the illusion that nobody supports it, so you refuse to support it yourself. Why?! Why not take a step forward and help them support it?!
[/rant]
I would reply to this if my only answer wasn't laughing really hard.Have you ever even TRIED Balanced Brawl?
It's at least 200% more balanced than vBrawl.
A general consensus of the compression:
We believe that the tiers have been compressed between vMarth and vIke.
No 100:0 matchups have been found. Heck, no 70:30 matchups have been found! Everybody has a chance at winning a tournament at high-level play! No character is 100% shut down by somebody else. They all have ways around it now.
And the great thing about bBrawl is that it's still Brawl, and not some horrible mutation that Brawl+ is!
I 100% support bBrawl. If it comes to the point that people will listen to me if I never play vBrawl again, then goddammit, I'll do that. bBrawl is completely superior to vBrawl. There is no reason to play vBrawl anymore now that a better Tournament Standard has been introduced.
Ganondorf used to have nothing. NOTHING. Now his DownB plows through ~90% of every projectile in the game when fresh. He has 0-death techchases on numerous parts of the cast once he mindgames his way in. The G&W/Yoshi VS Ganon matchup is so intense. They both have an option that if they play unhumanly perfect, Ganondorf will never get in, but once Ganondorf capitalises on our mistakes, our stock is as good as gone, as long as Ganondorf predicts well. He has true reward for his high risk now.
There are no more "Game Over" infinites, except for a 1-frame window ICs infinite.
I will personally, all on my own, run a side-event of bBrawl if there is time.
You are only helping a vicious cycle: You have the illusion that nobody supports it, so you refuse to support it yourself. Why?! Why not take a step forward and help them support it?!
[/rant]