Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Because E is for Scrubs.I just realized there's no E grade, lawl. Why is that...
Nonono no no...I assume it is going by a school grading system.
That's not fair! Why no E!? You're being cheap!E is for Scrubs.
Because E is for Scrubs. Duh.That's not fair! Why no E!? You're being cheap!
You know, this grading system isn't working that great... What if we ranked the characters in a "tier" for each ability and graded it from there .I believe the "tier" list would make a good relative standing of people understanding why their character got a certain grade when they see what characters are above him/her. And No posting "X character is better than Y Character" without solid reasons why comparing both characters to the whole cast.
THISSSSSSLOL. There is NO WAY Mario has a better GTFO off Me than Marth. If Marth is a C, than so is Mario. If Mario is a B, then so is Marth.
Marth is a C in gimping as well. He's okay in it, but he can only go out so far, and even doing so causes himself to be put at risk for being gimped.
adding E grade would make alot more sense
That and A - F is more traditional if we're going by letter grades.Nonono no no...
E is for Scrubs.
:3
I beg to differ. he may be a jack of trades, and has his average qualities, but he excels at alot ie Combos (cue my sig) and gimping (cue cape and fludd and fireballs)mario's everything needs to be lowered down one letter grade tbh <<"
He is indeed, the 'average' character of smash
The thing is the ice climbers grab is hard to land and can be made a non issue if the opponent gets rid of the cpu. Since no other character in the game has such reliance on another character I would argue that the throw is puts them in the F catagory (assuming that is the only way they can gimp people).Just to point out, a grab is a form of punish K.O. for the ice climbers... as such ice climbers shouldnt have an F for punishing, as if they land a grab due to an opponent's mistake, they can theoretically finish them with their evil grab game... even from 0%. should be more like B or C. However, Ice climbers should get a D, not a C, for gimp resistance. In certain situations its EXTREMELY easy to gimp ice climbers. They are: When seperated, when one is under hitstun and the other isnt (disallows cooperative up+B and side+b moves). and when simply SoPo (solo popo). For resilience, the ability to resist most if not all chain grabs very well due to having a second character model to attack with when grabbed warrants them a B (it can sometimes interrupt normal chains too, if an attack ahppens to hit one but not the other... your free to attack). The only reason they dont have an A is due to the fact that when seperated their resilence is pretty mediocre.
Everything else seems pretty much right.... their gimping is pretty horrid... the only thing you can do is mindgame their air dodge into a fair spike... good luck with that. The one thing that MAY give them a D instead of F for gimping is the fact that their bair is pretty fast and hits hard for the speed it comes out with decent (but not great) range. It can KO at 80-120%
I 2nd this statement. What is wrong? Everyone's score is fairly accurate. With projectiles + range + speed the grading makes sense.can you explain what's wrong with the spacing scores?
I think ICs are a C in spacing, as blizzard doesn't serve as a good spacing tool imo.Ice climbers should have at least a C or a B in spacing, that's basically what blizzard, and to a certain extent squall hammer are for. Maybe a D in gimping because of their bair...
Edit: nah F is pretty accurate.
If IC's were good at spacing, they'd get grabs more.
can you explain what's wrong with the spacing scores?
ok falcon (F) vs. jiggs (D)
better spacing:
falcon: down b
side B
up tilt
foward tilt
Down tilt
down smash
foward smash
grab
all his aerials i think (although b air and f air for jiggs are weird)
pretty much his whole moveset
falcon = up atleast a grade, 2 would be better.
jiggs = F, horrible spacing
fox = an F, what's so bad about his spacing?
lucas and ness = 1 grade lower atleast, it's one of their main issue's
samus = 1 grade lower atleast, maybe 2.
DK = uber spacing, A+
ike = up a grade atleast, more like 2, whole moveset is good range, + uber jab at close
link = atleast 1 grade up, more like 2, his sword is long.
G dorf = is not that bad, up a grade
zelda = is an A? but Dk isn't WTF?, down 1
toon link = sword is short, how on earth does he having better spacing than big sword reg link? down 1 at least (his like ness, long range effective moves are lacking, but once his close his ok)
diddy kong = an A? Does he even have a long range move? biggest wtf yet, down 2 at least, maybe even 3.
Captain Falcon would like to speak to you.In a sense, better mobility = better spacing ability.
I said ability, not spacing in general. Falcon and Fox do not have a moveset that can space. They are GET IN YOUR FACE type of characters being the opposite of spacing. DDD has a spacing moveset. Imagine if DDD has mobility, his spacing would be broken then.Captain Falcon would like to speak to you.
So would D3.
And Fox as well.
Spacing isn't solely attack range. Even in that case, Falcon only has one long-range attack, the up tilt, and it's laggy. If you think things like the knee are spacing attacks, well, ummm....cool.can you explain what's wrong with the spacing scores?
ok falcon (F) vs. jiggs (D)
better spacing:
falcon: down b
side B
up tilt
foward tilt
Down tilt
down smash
foward smash
grab
all his aerials i think (although b air and f air for jiggs are weird)
pretty much his whole moveset
falcon = up atleast a grade, 2 would be better.
jiggs = F, horrible spacing
fox = an F, what's so bad about his spacing?
lucas and ness = 1 grade lower atleast, it's one of their main issue's
samus = 1 grade lower atleast, maybe 2.
DK = uber spacing, A+
ike = up a grade atleast, more like 2, whole moveset is good range, + uber jab at close
link = atleast 1 grade up, more like 2, his sword is long.
G dorf = is not that bad, up a grade
zelda = is an A? but Dk isn't WTF?, down 1
toon link = sword is short, how on earth does he having better spacing than big sword reg link? down 1 at least (his like ness, long range effective moves are lacking, but once his close his ok)
diddy kong = an A? Does he even have a long range move? biggest wtf yet, down 2 at least, maybe even 3.
I said punish KO... punish KOs are when the opponent does something laggy and leaves themselves open for an attack (or grab) it is simply the ability to utilize an opening to the fullest effect.The thing is the ice climbers grab is hard to land and can be made a non issue if the opponent gets rid of the cpu. Since no other character in the game has such reliance on another character I would argue that the throw is puts them in the F catagory (assuming that is the only way they can gimp people).
While I have to say I thought this thread was useless in the first place, I would be interested in seeing some form of matchup list as part of a community thing. Provided it was easy to see and understand. And only filled in when values were generally accepted, instead of just taking a rough guess at matchups the player was inexperienced in.jiang said:<jiang_> close it without saying anything to make me seem like a tragic hero