OmegaXXII
Fire Emblem Lord/ Trophy Hunter
Blink 180, it's their overall style I find ammusing.
Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!
You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!
Don't you mean Blink-182?Blink 180, it's their overall style I find ammusing.
Blink 180, it's their overall style I find ammusing.
CHEYA!!!!! HI FIVEZ!!! Daft Punk.... is just epic. Their music is like art, it has a sort of symmetricalness to it.Daft Punk >_>
Miley Cyrus, Jonas Brothers, 50 Cent, Soulja boy. Brawl? Need I say more?Even if I'm not a fan, The Beatles have sold over a billion records and you can't argue with numbers.
If I'm the "next guy", then you probably don't like 'em much at all. I honestly can't stand the majority of their work, and that which I can, I'd not listen to by choice.The Beatles are a good 60's guitar pop band. I like 'em as much as the next guy, but the whole "most influential" and "most innovative/original" stuff is what I'm referring to, along with "they sold the most."
Although unfair to compare the Beatles to the likes of Mr. Bungle or The Residents, bands at the same time were experimenting way more than the Beatles did (and when John Lennon and Yoko Ono were experimenting everyone hated it, although it's really awesome music you guys should all check out), whether they had a gimmick (Bob Dylan adding electric rock instruments into folk is one of the biggest genre collisions ever; Blue Cheer and Black Sabbath were the forerunners for Metal; Velvet Underground were among the first minimalist noise bands) or genuinely trippy (The Mothers of Invention, Captain Beefheart, etc.). I'll give 'em influence, most bands after that say that they liked them at some point (see Jellyfish I posted earlier, their albums have Macca covers galore).
Beatles: Good band and all, but bands before and after did way more than the Beatles get credit for.
As much as I like Bowie, one of his common criticisms was changing his style to what was becoming popular at the time, although he would usually start his transition before the movement was in full bloom, most noticeably glam. He saw it was going to be big, and who are we to complain, we got Hunky Dory and Ziggy Stardust! Favorite albums by him are Low and Station to Station. Also if he did everything, wheres "Bowie sings Hank Williams?"(seriously, I'd love to see that).As for the most influential? I'm giving that reward to David Bowie. He did everything first, and to this day, is still 20 years ahead of his time.
Did u just mention soulja boy and Miley cyrus in the same category as the Beatles?Miley Cyrus, Jonas Brothers, 50 Cent, Soulja boy. Brawl? Need I say more?
Mainstream stuff usually sells more and usually sucks. The Best bands are always the hidden ones.
The Beatles aren't that good anyway.
Way to group radically different artists and bands together and imply that all mainstream is terrible without taking talent into account.Miley Cyrus, Jonas Brothers, 50 Cent, Soulja boy. Brawl? Need I say more?
Mainstream stuff usually sells more and usually sucks. The Best bands are always the hidden ones.
The Beatles aren't that good anyway.
And lo and behold, we again share the same taste. Tack on Heroes, and you've got yourself a deal. Those three albums were from the "Golden Years" of Bowie's career, courageously followed by Scary Monsters.As much as I like Bowie, one of his common criticisms was changing his style to what was becoming popular at the time, although he would usually start his transition before the movement was in full bloom, most noticeably glam. He saw it was going to be big, and who are we to complain, we got Hunky Dory and Ziggy Stardust! Favorite albums by him are Low and Station to Station. Also if he did everything, wheres "Bowie sings Hank Williams?"(seriously, I'd love to see that).
Listen to GoldShadow, he actually knows what he's talking about unlike most of you. People who don't like bands solely based on the fact that they're mainstream are fools. Obscure does not mean better, it just means less well known. Would you stop liking your favourite band if it became mainstream? You'd have to be pretty bitter and pathetic to base your musical preferences on popularity.Way to group radically different artists and bands together and imply that all mainstream is terrible without taking talent into account.
Just because modern mainstream (and for that matter, "hidden") sucks, it does not mean that has always been the case or that it is always true. It is certainly not true of the Beatles. That was a very different era; mainstream often meant "good", not "bad".
Seconded, though this real is the same as the what is your fave band thread.One word:
Dude, I haven't given Tool a good listen in forever. Not that long, but yeah. Got to get into that again. Undertow is one of the best of the decade.One word:
Kreator > Exodus > Slayer > Destruction > MegadethIf Metallica had stopped making albums after the Black album I might have called the the best band, but since that's not the case I'll go with Megadeth.
No way.Metallica.