• Welcome to Smashboards, the world's largest Super Smash Brothers community! Over 250,000 Smash Bros. fans from around the world have come to discuss these great games in over 19 million posts!

    You are currently viewing our boards as a visitor. Click here to sign up right now and start on your path in the Smash community!

Balance

the green baron

Smash Cadet
Joined
Feb 21, 2010
Messages
47
Location
Aurora, Illinois
What nerfs or buffs could be given to the characters to make the game more balanced (aka lower tiers more viable), i.e. pal changes, giving g&w a better shield + all aerials Lcancel, giving bowser a less laggy jump, yoshi being able to jump out of shield, giving roy's aerials more hitsun, etc.?
 

SSBMLahti

Smash Lord
Joined
Jun 5, 2010
Messages
1,252
A perfect game is a game without perfectly balanced characters...just sayin'.
 

Fly_Amanita

Master of Caribou
Joined
Aug 24, 2007
Messages
4,224
Location
Claremont, CA
Balance is strictly a good thing. Having characters horribly wipe out others only limits the game.

Melee is good because of its general gameplay, not because Sheik wrecks half the cast and whatnot. I'm not advocating completely perfect balance, as that simply isn't practical, but acting as if balance is an undesirable trait is absurd.
 

Strong Badam

Super Elite
Administrator
Premium
BRoomer
Joined
Feb 27, 2008
Messages
26,565
a wide range of character viability increases competitive depth. there's only so much to the match-ups between the top 8 chars. game stays fresh longer when more characters can do well.
 

Wretched

Dankness of Heart
Joined
Aug 6, 2010
Messages
4,166
Location
New Mexico
Aw, C'mon KK.
Honestly, I've never seen people give supergood answers to this kind of question, so why not take the opportunity to do it?

First off, the fact that it isn't balanced is why we love it. I'd go bat**** if I played someone at my level who used Pichu and beat me.

Next, the only way we'd know if something were balanced is if we made changes and then played it for 10 years again. Who knows if Yoshi having a jump/WD OOS would break the game and Yoshi would be top tier, and some player named generic fruit would come and wreck everyone.
 

Wretched

Dankness of Heart
Joined
Aug 6, 2010
Messages
4,166
Location
New Mexico
Jigglypuff with shine?
Marth with shine+his ridiculous grab range? Shine into perfectly spaced tippers?
ICE CLIMBERS WITH TWO SHINES?
This sounds like an interesting version of melee.
 

the green baron

Smash Cadet
Joined
Feb 21, 2010
Messages
47
Location
Aurora, Illinois
i dont want perfect balance because that would be boring, i just want there to be no match ups worse than 55-45 and maybe 60-40. (btw ice climbers with a shine= desync shield pressure O.o). I think to make kirby better you could give him aerial mobility close to jiggz and a better nair
 

Fly_Amanita

Master of Caribou
Joined
Aug 24, 2007
Messages
4,224
Location
Claremont, CA
I fail to see how more balance could possibly make the game more dull, provided that you're not sacrificing variety for the sake of balance, which is something I should have mentioned in my last post.

For example, if you could magically make all the Melee characters on par with the top/high tiers without drastically altering their playstyles, you'd still have all the awesome match-ups between the really good characters that you already did, but suddenly a bunch of other characters can legitimately join the fray without getting wrecked by anybody who is decently competent.
 

the green baron

Smash Cadet
Joined
Feb 21, 2010
Messages
47
Location
Aurora, Illinois
jeez, i mean that sometimes i like playing a disadvantageous match up because if i win its a better feeling than winning an even match up. (plus i like having my match up johns if i lose :embarrass:)
 

Veetaak

Smash Lord
Joined
May 11, 2010
Messages
1,119
Location
Stockholm, Sweden
I fail to see how more balance could possibly make the game more dull, provided that you're not sacrificing variety for the sake of balance, which is something I should have mentioned in my last post.

For example, if you could magically make all the Melee characters on par with the top/high tiers without drastically altering their playstyles, you'd still have all the awesome match-ups between the really good characters that you already did, but suddenly a bunch of other characters can legitimately join the fray without getting wrecked by anybody who is decently competent.
This x1000000000

I don't think that balance makes it boring as he said. It's the variety of the characters that makes it fun to play/watch.

Also: I would prefer if the low/mid tiers got buffed instead of high tiers getting nerfed
 

Wake

Smash Master
Joined
Sep 27, 2010
Messages
3,191
Location
Thank you Based Mimi.
Yeah people are talking about slightly different things when it comes to the game being dull if it were balanced.

If it were practical for every character to be balanced with respect to one another without changing their variety (like all characters having the same moveset), then it could only lead to more interesting MUs not dulled ones.

But some people are talking about trying to balance 26 characters practically, which would probably result in the characters being similar and therefore a more dull (in my opinion) game.
 

the green baron

Smash Cadet
Joined
Feb 21, 2010
Messages
47
Location
Aurora, Illinois
i agree that more variety would be a good thing, that was the point of wanting more balance. slight unbalance isnt a bad thing. playing bad matchups helps make us better players. i guess ill withdraw the perfect balance= boring statement, i realize it wouldnt be boring but i would prefer slight unbalance.
 

N64

Smash Champion
Joined
Oct 18, 2004
Messages
2,158
Location
Stalking Skler
I'm being a negative nancy.

I've just seen this thread I don't know how many times and fail to see the point of it. Say people contribute a number of balancing ideas, then what happens? We all say "yeah that'd be pretty cool." Then the thread falls off the 1st page, never gets touched again, and a month later another "Hey guys how would you balance melee?" thread comes up.
 

Twinkles

Smash Lord
Joined
Mar 5, 2011
Messages
1,022
Location
SoCal
I know but

what else are you going to do on this forum

it's something to do when you're not actually playing the game
 

Mr Wizzrobe

Smash Journeyman
Joined
Aug 3, 2011
Messages
438
Location
Moncton, New Brunswick
It's fun to theorize about stuff that will never happen.

Like, the concept of Ness being top tier in Melee is so ridiculous, but it's fun to imagine just what he would need to climb that far. I think it would be fun to take all low tier characters and "fix" them to make them viable for high/top tier.
 

Strong Badam

Super Elite
Administrator
Premium
BRoomer
Joined
Feb 27, 2008
Messages
26,565
without actually implementing those changes and playtesting you really have no idea how well you've balanced though :/
 

DerfMidWest

Fresh ******
Joined
Mar 31, 2011
Messages
4,063
Location
Cleveland, OH
Slippi.gg
SOFA#941
I was thinking about this earlier while playing today. Pichu should be invincible while doing his upB like sheik is. Then he'd be like... much higher on the tier list :3

just be invincible all the way across the stage. i'd think he'd be at least d tier with that...
 

The Star King

Smash Hero
Joined
Nov 6, 2007
Messages
9,681
Lol @ the people who say they love it because it's unbalanced. You probably only think that way because you're used to it.

If you were used to a balanced game, and somebody said "Hey let's make half the cast unviable", would you support it? Haha, yeah right >_>
 

Kal

Smash Champion
Joined
Dec 21, 2004
Messages
2,973
I don't really care that it's unbalanced. I tend to view games as "balanced roster + unviable characters." The bigger the "balanced roster" part is, the better. But if the game had 20 additional Pichu-esque joke characters who clearly sucked, it would not be any worse.
 

Anth0ny

Smash Master
Joined
Oct 14, 2007
Messages
4,061
Location
Toronto, Ontario
I don't think 50-50 matchups across the board is very fun, or possible. However, there are definitely some easy changes that could be made to some characters movesets that would make them viable. Mewtwo being heavier, Pichu not damaging himself, Dr. Mario and Mario fusing together to have one great moveset instead of one good and one okay moveset... just off the top of my head.

Project M is on top of this =P
 

DerfMidWest

Fresh ******
Joined
Mar 31, 2011
Messages
4,063
Location
Cleveland, OH
Slippi.gg
SOFA#941
Pichu not damaging himself would make very little difference in his matchups...
Pichu players only deal like 5-15% to themselves per stock anyways (depending on their playstyle)

it honestly doesn't make a difference, I usually don't even pay attention to the self damage.

The way they could make pichu better is to give him a bit more range and priority. or make him invincible whilst using upB :3

The only thing that removing self damage would change is his ability to camp with jolts and he would live like... 1 hit longer.

and yes, the only way that a game can be totally balanced is if there is only 1 character.
 

Shadow Huan

Smash Champion
Joined
Oct 31, 2008
Messages
2,224
Location
Springfield, MA
mewtwo should've been the best character in melee.

bowser's jump animation should not be slower than fox's friggen up smash.

kirby shouldn't suck so much, he's got 5 jumps but no air mobility? -_-

no character should have a move that spikes for 30 frames *glares at falco*

even tho i like sheik and she's one of my strongest characters, no character should have a move that negates half the cast *coughdthrowcough* the pal sheik dthrow is fine by me

zelda could've been better ect ect ect you can go on and on, from what i heard about the 4th installment... i just thank god that people who know how to balance characters are going to be doing it in smash 4.

ehhhhhhh \rant

:phone:
 
Top Bottom